The last face on earth that condemned men see as they are strapped on to the gurney for their execution by lethal injection in the death chambers of the prisons in US southern states is often that of a diminutive, grey-haired Catholic nun. She gazes into their eyes for as long as she can, trying to give them strength and show human compassion for their last few minutes.
It is a vocation that has made Sister Helen Prejean famous, especially since her story was dramatized 10 years ago in the film Dead Man Walking, in which she was played by Susan Sarandon, who has become her friend. It has also made her one of the doughtiest, most outspoken and maybe most formidable opponents of the death penalty in the US.
She has attended the execution of men she knows to be guilty of horrific crimes, but also of men she believes to be innocent, and prays with and counsels their families and those of victims. She believes that executions are morally wrong but the killing of the innocent, subjected often to a callous and stubborn judicial refusal over years properly to reinvestigate their cases after conviction, fills her with revulsion.
Prejean, 66, who could have opted for a quieter life as a teacher, makes herself attend and to be with men she has often befriended over several years. As their spiritual adviser, she can stay after their relatives have been escorted away, acting as the last friend they have:
"I go there to be there for them," she said. "When they look in my face they see someone who cares about them and believes in their dignity. They know that I will tell their story. You have to steel yourself to be utterly thinking of them. It is afterwards that you vomit."
In London to publicize her book The Death of Innocents, which details the cases of two men she believes were wrongfully executed, the Louisiana-based nun insisted that politicians' rhetoric is moderating and that the number of death penalty convictions is in decline. Public uneasiness about wrongful convictions and the manifest inequity with which the death penalty is implemented is growing.
Prejean said: "John Kerry was the first presidential candidate in 30 years to say he was against the death penalty and George Bush never made anything of it politically. In New Jersey they have just agreed a moratorium on the death penalty which the governor has said he will sign, and since 2001 across the country the number of death sentences has halved."
Prejean is scathing about politicians and judges who use the Bible to justify executions: "I call it Christianity-lite. It's not real Christianity. Truly, it is blasphemy. Jesus Christ is being held hostage by these people: his whole message is being perverted."
The cases in the book are those of Dobie Williams, a black man with learning difficulties, executed in 1999 for the murder of a white woman in Louisiana in 1985, and Joseph O'Dell, a white man killed in 1997 in Virginia for murdering and raping a white woman whose body was found near a bar he had visited one night 12 years earlier. It sets out cogent reasons for their innocence, or at least grounds on which the state and court authorities should have reconsidered their convictions.
O'Dell was executed despite an appeal by the pope for clemency, and despite the refusal of the state's governor to let the execution be delayed to allow DNA testing of some of the evidence.
She is now involved with another case in Louisiana: that of Manuel Ortiz from El Salvador, convicted in what she believes was a corrupt trial for hiring a hit man to murder his wife.
The book points out that only 2 percent of annual murder convictions result in the death penalty but says 80 percent of executions are in the south. More than 40 percent of death row inhabitants are black. Texas alone carried out 39 percent of all executions since the punishment was reinstated nearly 30 years ago.
The book is fiercely critical of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, a Catholic who claims to be obeying biblical injunctions and the intentions of the 18th-century framers of the Constitution.
Prejean has little more hope for Bush's appointments to the Supreme Court -- John Roberts, also a Catholic, and current nominee Samuel Alito.
"They come out of the same George Bush cookie cutter. They have a certain ideology and it is not one that will be on the side of standing up for people's rights. They are right-wing authoritarians," she said. "These people put on five pairs of white gloves when they are considering death penalty cases. They do not see the people they are dealing with as human. That's how Auschwitz happened."
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
RSS