Wed, Feb 25, 2026 page12

• Environmental Impact Assessment: When the world gets too loud

  From Siberian cranes to cicadas and offshore wind farms, Taiwan grapples with the ecological costs of human-made noise

  • By Steven Crook / Contributing reporter
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  The Siberian crane (Leucogeranus leucogeranus) is an exceptionally attractive bird. Mature specimens have snowy white plumage and wingspans well over 200cm. This critically endangered species wasn’t recorded in Taiwan until December 2014, when a juvenile landed in New Taipei City’s Jinshan District (金山), having apparently gotten separated from its flock during a southward migration from the Russian Arctic to Poyang Lake (鄱陽湖) in China.

  During the crane’s 17-month sojourn, the area’s rice farmers curtailed their use of agrochemicals. A security detail paid for by the local government prevented dogs and photographers from getting too close to the bird.

  In November 2021, a second Siberian crane was sighted, this time close to Kaising Temple (開興廟) in Yilan City. The local government responded immediately to ensure pesticides weren’t sprayed in the neighborhood and birdwatchers didn’t disturb the crane.

  

  Some local research into how anthropogenic noise impacts wildlife has focused on Cryptotympana takasagona, a common cicada species.

  Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons

  Showing an awareness that’s unusual, the authorities announced that, in the runup to the Gregorian and Lunar New Years, there’d be no firecrackers, fireworks or bell ringing at the temple. They also requested that those living nearby shouldn’t make excessive noise until the crane left, which it eventually did in March 2022.

  There’s no doubt that anthropogenic noise has negative impacts on wildlife. What with the hum of factories, the din of road traffic, and fixing offshore wind turbines in place, humanity makes quite a racket — and it’s more than just an annoyance for birds, mammals, and sea creatures.

  ACOUSTIC ECOLOGY

  

  When a Siberian crane spent time in Yilan in 2021-22, the authorities asked those nearby to avoid making noise that might stress or drive away this rare bird.

  Photo courtesy of the Yilan City Government

  What conservationists call “acoustic ecology” — the study of relationships between living beings and their environment through sound — is a relatively new research field. Two of the earliest studies by Taiwanese scholars looked at how man-made noise affects cicadas, of which the country has at least 60 species.

  For their 2012 paper, a team which included Shieh Bao-sen (謝寶森) and Liang Shih-hsiung (梁世雄) recorded the calling songs of the male Cryptotympana takasagona, a cicada that’s common between sea level and elevations below 1,200m, in built-up parts of Kaohsiung. Like a great many species, acoustic signaling is central to its mating strategy. Rather than engage in what’s called “temporal shifting” (waiting for a gap or a lull in the cacophony), the researchers discovered that Cryptotympana takasagona sang at higher frequencies when immersed in anthropogenic noise.

  The long-term consequences for urban populations aren’t yet clear. The researchers mention that larger males may be able to adjust their song frequency by changing their abdominal cavities. But it’s also possible that, because smaller males naturally produce higher-pitched sounds, they’ll have a distinct advantage. If their mating calls are the only ones to cut through the rumble of traffic, females will find and mate with them. Evolutionary pressure would thus favor smaller body sizes, a form of “human-induced selection” like that which famously changed the appearance of the peppered moth in 19th-century Manchester. (As soot from coal-burning factories polluted the environment, light-colored moths were at greater risk of bird predation; within a few decades, the percentage of dark-colored moths went from less than 1 percent to 98 percent.)

  

  Despite mitigation efforts, building offshore wind turbines is inevitably noisy and almost certainly deleterious for whales, dolphins, and other ocean creatures.

  Photo: TT file photo

  Mankind can’t be blamed for everything, however. Some species struggle to make themselves heard because their vocalizations are drowned out by other forest dwellers. For his 2017 master’s thesis at National Taiwan University’s School of Resource and Forestry Conservation, Chen Yi-chuan (陳奕全) examined acoustic competition between cicadas and birds in Yangmingshan National Park, and confirmed that the former “interfere with avian vocal behavior,” frequency overlap and sound intensity being key factors.

  Shieh and Liang, this time working with Chiu Yuh-wen (邱郁文), went on to compare cicadas in urban Kaohsiung with those in Shanping Forest Ecological Garden (扇平森林生態科學園), a pristine conservation site far from human population centers. Their 2015 paper notes that, at the city sites where they made digital recordings, they found fewer cicada species and higher anthropogenic noise than at Shanping. Urban cicada assemblages “suffered more from selective pressures of anthropogenic noise,” but less from interspecies masking, than their relatives at Shanping.

  The following year, the trio published research on how traffic noise impacts the cooing of pigeons. They found that “dominant urban species such as the spotted dove… temporally and spatially adjust cooing to reduce the masking effects of traffic noise,” while less common species (such as the emerald dove) avoid places where there’s a lot of traffic.

  

  In addition to being a source of air pollution, the massive use of pyrotechnics in Taiwanese religious culture disturbs the country’s animals and insects.

  Photo: Tsai Wen-chu, Taipei Times

  Efforts to protect birds from man-made noise aren’t always well received by humans. On Feb. 20, 2013, the Liberty Times (the Chinese-language sister newspaper of Taipei Times) reported that residents of Hanbao (漢寶), a village in Changhua County’s Fangyuan Township (芳苑), were unhappy that the authorities had funded the addition of barriers to a nearby stretch of Expressway 61, so as to protect around 60 pairs of black-winged kites (Elanus caeruleus) from both noise and light disturbance, but weren’t willing to do the same where people were actually living. “Do humans matter less than birds?” the newspaper quoted them as saying.

  SILENT SEAS OR GREEN POWER?

  Offshore wind is central to Taiwan’s efforts to reduce its carbon emissions, but the country also has more than 350 onshore wind turbines. For several years, people living near these bladed towers have complained that the low-frequency noise they generate disturbs their sleep. As long ago as 2009, goat farmers were claiming that the background whoosh-whoosh caused scores of their animals to die of exhaustion.

  Yet placing turbines out of earshot doesn’t mean there won’t be acoustic disturbance. Cetaceans and fish rely on sounds for various life functions, among them feeding, reproduction, and navigation. In noisy environments, sea creatures show limited sound and prey/predator detection, and shorter communication range. They may change their vocalization, swimming speed, and/or social cohesion. Some suffer hearing damage or the physiological consequences of stress.

  Not surprisingly, the construction phase is far noisier than the operational phase. Driving piles into the seabed can be, for whatever lives in the surrounding waters, literally deafening.

  To mitigate this problem, Taiwan’s Ministry of the Environment requires companies building wind farms to ensure that: no more than one in 20 pile-driving thrusts exceeds 160 decibels, measured at a distance of 750m; that each session begins with gentler strikes, to scare away any dolphins or whales in the vicinity; and observers on site are ready to call a halt to work if a cetacean is spotted within a certain distance (usually 500m or 1,000m).

  It’s possible to install offshore wind turbines without pile driving. One alternative is to fit them with bases which are heavy enough to stay in position without pushing down into the sediment. Another is to use turbines that float. But if units of either kind are to survive in the seas around Taiwan, they’ll need to be typhoon-proof.

  Researchers in several countries, including Taiwan, are developing floating turbines. If they’re successful, marine life won’t be the only beneficiary. Where the water is too deep for turbines fixed to the ocean floor, winds tend to be stronger and more consistent. It’s hard to see how Taiwan will meet its ambitious wind-power targets (18.4 GW target by 2035) without floating turbines. Like many environmental issues, the push for renewables brings to mind Thomas Sowell’s famous words: “There are no solutions, only trade-offs.”

  Steven Crook, the author or co-author of four books about Taiwan, has been following environmental issues since he arrived in the country in 1991. He drives a hybrid and carries his own chopsticks. The views expressed here are his own.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    First person arrested as Danjiang Bridge opens

  • 2

    TSMC shares stumble on report, but losses minor

  • 3

    Police identify man who engaged in indecency at park

  • 4

    TSMC expects global chip revenue to hit US$1.5tn

  • 5

    Trump weighs Taiwan arms package