In a sudden move last week, opposition lawmakers of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) passed a NT$780 billion special defense budget as a preemptive measure to stop either Chinese leader Xi Jinping (習近平) or US President Donald Trump from blocking US arms sales to Taiwan at their summit in Beijing, said KMT heavyweight Jaw Shau-kong (趙少康), speaking to the Taipei Foreign Correspondents Club on Wednesday night in Taipei.
The 76-year-old Jaw, a political talk show host who ran as the KMT’s vice presidential candidate in 2024, says that he personally brokered the deal to resolve the long-debated budget impasse at a May 6 meeting of the KMT’s Central Standing Committee, just two days before the KMT-led legislature passed the controversial budget.
“The proposal that passed was my suggestion,” said Jaw, who spoke mainly in English.
Photo: TT file photo
Jaw’s press conference came just hours before Trump landed in Beijing, where the president is scheduled to conduct two days of talks with China’s Xi from May 13 to 15.
Ahead of the Xi-Trump summit, Chinese state media argued vehemently and at length against the US selling weapons to Taiwan, prompting international speculation that Trump would use the arms sales as a bargaining chip in the talks.
To do so would be a major reversal in longstanding US policy, but has been nevertheless feared by numerous observers owing to Trump’s unpredictable nature.
The US is obligated by law to provide Taiwan with defensive weapons, and, according to a 1982 commitment known as the “Six Assurances to Taiwan,” has further promised not to discuss such arms sales with Beijing. Trump has however been vague when asked about leaving discussions of arms sales to Taiwan off the table with China’s Xi.
’MONEY IS MONEY
Anticipating this, the KMT wanted to give neither Trump nor Xi a chance to stop the arms sales, said Jaw. Though China is strongly opposed to the sales, Xi will not be able to argue: “Taiwan, they cut their own budget. Why do you want to sell them?” he said.
In regards to the US, Jaw continued, Taiwan can now say: “We already carried out our own responsibility.”
Trump can thus be reasonably assured of Taiwan’s commitment to defend itself and, in line with his transactional style, will be happy to have a check for US$25 billion now in his back pocket — a check he’ll be loath to give up, Jaw argued.
“For Trump, money is money,” he said.
To persuade Trump against selling arms to Taiwan, Jaw said, Xi would need an incredibly attractive offer. But what Xi is likely offering — purchases of Boeing aircraft, soybeans and beef — are merely measures to “give face” to the US president on the current visit.
“I don’t think Xi Jinping will give [Trump] the benefits justified to sacrifice Taiwan,” he said.
Coming just five days ahead of the Xi-Trump summit, the sudden passage of Taiwan’s arms procurement budget came to many as a surprise. For months, the the KMT had firmly opposed a larger NT$1.25 trillion version of the defense budget originally proposed by President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) in November last year. For most of the last half year, Lai’s defense budget appeared to be dead in the water.
KMT’S BUDGET CONSENSUS
As a result of both US and domestic pressure, KMT leaders in recent months came up with various counter-proposals to Lai’s budget. The most prominent came from Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕), former KMT Eric Chu (朱立倫) and current chair Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文). Their proposed budgets ranged from NT$350 to NT$900 billion.
These various plans finally came up for a sort of battle royale style debate at a KMT Central Standing Committee meeting on May 6 –– just over a week ago.
At the meeting, Jaw told the others, “I can cover all these kinds of different opinions, and put them together,” he said.
But when he offered a compromise plan, he met strong resistance, at least initially.
“They attacked me, all kinds [of ways]. Very tough attacks,” he said.
Claiming that “everyone’s suggestions” were covered in his proposal, he added, “I really don’t understand why.”
Under the urgency of the moment, the KMT committee did finally come to a consensus. The version of the budget that passed was “almost my proposal,” Jaw said.
Two days later in the legislature, the KMT and their opposition coalition partner TPP, who control a majority between them, voted unanimously to pass the measure. All 48 Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) legislators present at the session abstained from the vote.
The budget that was passed differed significantly from the originally DPP version. Not only was it 40 percent lower in value, it exclusively approved weapons purchases from the US while eliminating the DPP’s plan for domestic development of a drone industry. Critics of the KMT plan say drones and other asymmetric capabilities are vital to Taiwan’s defense.
One powerful factor that moved the KMT to action was the influence of US lawmakers. Two US congressional delegations visited Taiwan in March and last month. These included an all-Republican delegation led by Zach Nunn, leader of a congressional national security task force, from April 5 to 11, and a bipartisan group of US senators including Jeanne Shaheen, John Curtis, Thom Tillis and Jacky Rosen on March 30 and 31.
Jaw confirmed that these US delegations met with KMT legislators in efforts to “persuade” them to pass an arms package. Jaw, however, resisted the characterization of the US as “pressuring” the KMT into passing the budget. He further denied that the US set down a bottom line for the minimum amount of the arms procurement.
Jaw also made several remarks hinting that current KMT chair Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) influence within the party is perhaps more limited than her oversized media presence would suggest.
HUANGFUXING FACTION
Cheng’s NT$380 billion arms budget proposal was the smallest of the various KMT proposals. Though Jaw did not describe her plan as rejected in favor of the larger NT$780 billion plan, he did however insinuate that Cheng has become beholden to a deep blue faction of military veterans known as the Huangfuxing (黃復興).
Jaw described Huangfuxing as the KMT’s “backbone” and said it provided “most of the votes” for Cheng in the party chair election. But when it comes to national elections, the backing of one faction is not enough, he said.
“I don’t deny Huangfuxing’s contribution. I think it’s important,” Jaw said. “But [it’s] not enough. The KMT cannot become Huangfuxing’s party.”
If that were to happen, the KMT’s support base would become “smaller and smaller,” he added.
Jaw also noted that the 65,000 votes Cheng garnered to become KMT party chair is less than the 100,000 or more votes needed to become a legislator. His implication is that Cheng has less popular support than other top KMT figures.
On Taiwan’s development of drones, Jaw said he’s not opposed. With the domestically focused NT$400 billion portion of President Lai’s defense budget that the KMT cut, the opposition’s main point of resistance is the perception of “DPP corruption,” Jaw said.
Essentially, the fear is that the DPP will award contracts to party-aligned companies, use those connections to build political strength and at the same time freeze out the opposition.
Jaw also spoke about his views on cross-strait diplomacy. Jaw believes in the eventual unification of Taiwan and China, but not under current conditions.
At present, “I think we [Taiwan] can be a lighthouse of democracy for China,” Jaw said.
He further compared China to a suitor that’s attempting to woo Taiwan, an unwilling bride.
“Taiwan should say to China, you are not qualified to marry me now, but I will not get married with another guy.”
What Taiwan should say to China is, “You think your system is good, but we feel our system is better. So for now, we rule Taiwan with our system. But in China’s history, 100 or 200 years is a very short time. So don’t be rushed,” Jaw said.
May 11 to May 17 Traversing the southern slopes of the Yushan Range in 1931, Japanese naturalist Tadao Kano knew he was approaching the last swath of Taiwan still beyond colonial control. The “vast, unknown territory,” protected by the “fierce” Bunun headman Dahu Ali, was “filled with an utterly endless jungle that choked the mountains and valleys,” Kano wrote. He noted how the group had “refused to submit to the measures of our authorities and entrenched themselves deep in these mountains … living a free existence spent chasing deer in the morning and seeking serow in the evening,” even describing them as
As a different column was being written, the big news dropped that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) announced that negotiations within his caucus, with legislative speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) of the KMT, party Chair Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chair Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) had produced a compromise special military budget proposal. On Thursday morning, prior to meeting with Cheng over a lunch of beef noodles, Lu reiterated her support for a budget of NT$800 or NT$900 billion — but refused to comment after the meeting. Right after Fu’s
Yesterday, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) nominated legislator Puma Shen (沈伯洋) as their Taipei mayoral candidate, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) put their stamp of approval on Wei Ping-cheng (魏平政) as their candidate for Changhua County commissioner and former legislator Tsai Pi-ru (蔡壁如) of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) has begun the process to also run in Changhua, though she has not yet been formally nominated. All three news items are bizarre. The DPP has struggled with settling on a Taipei nominee. The only candidate who declared interest was Enoch Wu (吳怡農), but the party seemed determined to nominate anyone
What government project has expropriated the most land in Taiwan? According to local media reports, it is the Taoyuan Aerotropolis, eating 2,500 hectares of land in its first phase, with more to come. Forty thousand people are expected to be displaced by the project. Naturally that enormous land grab is generating powerful pushback. Last week Chen Chien-ho (陳健和), a local resident of Jhuwei Borough (竹圍) in Taoyuan City’s Dayuan District (大園) filed a petition for constitutional review of the project after losing his case at the Taipei Administrative Court. The Administrative Court found in favor of nine other local landowners, but