Aug. 20 to Aug. 26
On Aug. 24, 1962, Indonesia refused to allow Taiwan and Israel to participate in the Asian Games in Jakarta. And exactly 30 years later, Taiwan severed relations with its long-time close ally, South Korea.
Both events happened because of China, not unlike today’s situation where Taiwan continues to lose allies and faces challenges in international competitions such as being stripped of the right to host the East Asian Youth Games.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
The way things happened and the consequences, however, differ from that of today — the International Olympic Committee (IOC) suspended Indonesia’s membership indefinitely for the move and the South Korea incident sparked huge anti-Korean outrage in Taiwan with flags burned, direct flights canceled and other forms of protest.
BARRED FROM COMPETITION
Friederike Trotier writes in The Legacy of the Games of the New Emerging Forces and Indonesia’s Relationship with the International Olympic Committee that the Asian Games Federation (AGF) kept a low profile with regard to the “two Chinas” issue after the Chinese Civil War, and since the Taiwan-based Republic of China was an AGF member, it participated in the 1954 and 1958 Asian Games while the People’s Republic of China stayed home.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
Not nearly as powerful as it is today, China could only boycott the 1956 Summer Olympics when Taiwan was also invited. The Chinese Olympic Committee exchanged heated letters with IOC chair Avery Brundage, who was American, including the following passage: “As for your remark that there is a separate government in Taiwan … you must not forget how this situation is brought about … that these traitors are able to survive in Taiwan today is due to the political, economic and military aid brought directly by the US government and the open interference in the internal affairs of our country…”
But Indonesia had different ideas. Its president Sukarno had strong views against imperialism, colonialism and capitalism, and sought to become the leader of emerging nations that had been oppressed by the above forces. The country was close to China, who participated in the 1955 Bandung Conference, a meeting held in Indonesia by mostly newly-independent Asian and African states.
Trotier writes that the Asian Games were not only meant to support Sukarno’s ideology and nation-building policy, it also “became a political message of anti-Western sentiments.”
Victor Cha, an American academic and former national policy advisor under US president George W Bush, writes that “Sukarno quietly promised Beijing that Taiwan would not be there.” Israel was also excluded because of Indonesia’s ties with its enemies.
Of course, Indonesia couldn’t do this openly. Even though Taiwan received an invitation in February 1962, its delegation never received their visas. When Taiwan’s Asia Games director Hao Keng-sheng (郝更生) flew to Indonesia in August without a visa to figure out what was going on, he was denied entry. When Indonesia officially announced Taiwan’s exclusion on Aug. 24, it blamed the decision on Hao for trying to illegally enter the country — though it was clear that it was due to “communist bandit meddling.”
The games went on as usual, and although Indonesia was suspended from the IOC, it was reinstated in April 1964 by apologizing and agreeing to abide by IOC rules.
BROTHERLY SPLIT
In the afternoon of Aug. 24, 1992, the staff of the Taiwanese embassy in Seoul held a ceremony to lower the Republic of China flag. The decision was abrupt — only a day earlier did China and South Korea “strongly suggest” that they were about to establish relations in the following few days, with Taiwan breaking off ties with South Korea in response.
“For decades, China’s ties with North Korea, and Taiwan’s relations with South Korea, were built on ideological similarities. But now, the new ties seem to be dominated by pragmatism,” the New York Times reported, citing economic factors for the switch. In 1991, trade between South Korea and Taiwan was at about US$3 billion, while the number was almost double for that with China.
In the year before ties were severed, South Korea was discouraging Taiwan from “selling consulates and the land under its embassy,” which was worth an estimated US$1.9 billion, promising that it wouldn’t jump ship, according to the New York Times. These assets were all transferred to China.
Taiwan announced that it would suspend all direct flights from South Korea and end all economic incentives. News programs aired footage of angry Taiwanese holding signs that read: “Brotherly nations? Bullshit!” and burning South Korean flags.
Rick Chu (朱立熙), a Korean expert and former Taipei Times editor-in-chief, writes in the introduction of his book Goodbye Arirang (再見阿里郎) that the severing of ties with South Korea was unprecedentedly swift, but not unexpected.
Chu writes that he spoke to a Chinese official in New York who told him that although China had already planned to establish ties with South Korea, “the Taiwan factor” hastened that realization.
“Because of Taiwan’s divisionism and diplomatic maneuvering, China felt that they needed to act as soon as possible to cut off Taiwan’s final ‘root’ in Asia,” the official says, pointing to the June 1992 reestablishment of relations between Taiwan and Niger, which only lasted for four years.
Chu writes that since the 1980s, every ambassador to South Korea knew that the “death date was close,” and took on a policy of trying to drag things out for as long as possible despite strong indication that South Korea was cozying up to China.
“Although our citizens are slightly surprised because it happened sooner than expected, and also angry, it seems that everyone also feels that a weight had been lifted off our shoulders. We finally don’t have to stoop to compromise, and give South Korea whatever it wants,” he writes.
“The problem is, what’s our next step? If one day, Taiwan’s allies dip to the single digits, what should we do?”
Chu asks in 1993 the same questions we are pondering today. And we still do not have answers as China’s power and influence continues to increase.
Taiwan in Time, a column about Taiwan’s history that is published every Sunday, spotlights important or interesting events around the nation that have anniversaries this week.
In recent weeks the Trump Administration has been demanding that Taiwan transfer half of its chip manufacturing to the US. In an interview with NewsNation, US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick said that the US would need 50 percent of domestic chip production to protect Taiwan. He stated, discussing Taiwan’s chip production: “My argument to them was, well, if you have 95 percent, how am I gonna get it to protect you? You’re going to put it on a plane? You’re going to put it on a boat?” The stench of the Trump Administration’s mafia-style notions of “protection” was strong
Every now and then, it’s nice to just point somewhere on a map and head out with no plan. In Taiwan, where convenience reigns, food options are plentiful and people are generally friendly and helpful, this type of trip is that much easier to pull off. One day last November, a spur-of-the-moment day hike in the hills of Chiayi County turned into a surprisingly memorable experience that impressed on me once again how fortunate we all are to call this island home. The scenery I walked through that day — a mix of forest and farms reaching up into the clouds
With one week left until election day, the drama is high in the race for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chair. The race is still potentially wide open between the three frontrunners. The most accurate poll is done by Apollo Survey & Research Co (艾普羅民調公司), which was conducted a week and a half ago with two-thirds of the respondents party members, who are the only ones eligible to vote. For details on the candidates, check the Oct. 4 edition of this column, “A look at the KMT chair candidates” on page 12. The popular frontrunner was 56-year-old Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文)
“How China Threatens to Force Taiwan Into a Total Blackout” screamed a Wall Street Journal (WSJ) headline last week, yet another of the endless clickbait examples of the energy threat via blockade that doesn’t exist. Since the headline is recycled, I will recycle the rebuttal: once industrial power demand collapses (there’s a blockade so trade is gone, remember?) “a handful of shops and factories could run for months on coal and renewables, as Ko Yun-ling (柯昀伶) and Chao Chia-wei (趙家緯) pointed out in a piece at Taiwan Insight earlier this year.” Sadly, the existence of these facts will not stop the
RSS