Aug. 20 to Aug. 26
On Aug. 24, 1962, Indonesia refused to allow Taiwan and Israel to participate in the Asian Games in Jakarta. And exactly 30 years later, Taiwan severed relations with its long-time close ally, South Korea.
Both events happened because of China, not unlike today’s situation where Taiwan continues to lose allies and faces challenges in international competitions such as being stripped of the right to host the East Asian Youth Games.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
The way things happened and the consequences, however, differ from that of today — the International Olympic Committee (IOC) suspended Indonesia’s membership indefinitely for the move and the South Korea incident sparked huge anti-Korean outrage in Taiwan with flags burned, direct flights canceled and other forms of protest.
BARRED FROM COMPETITION
Friederike Trotier writes in The Legacy of the Games of the New Emerging Forces and Indonesia’s Relationship with the International Olympic Committee that the Asian Games Federation (AGF) kept a low profile with regard to the “two Chinas” issue after the Chinese Civil War, and since the Taiwan-based Republic of China was an AGF member, it participated in the 1954 and 1958 Asian Games while the People’s Republic of China stayed home.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
Not nearly as powerful as it is today, China could only boycott the 1956 Summer Olympics when Taiwan was also invited. The Chinese Olympic Committee exchanged heated letters with IOC chair Avery Brundage, who was American, including the following passage: “As for your remark that there is a separate government in Taiwan … you must not forget how this situation is brought about … that these traitors are able to survive in Taiwan today is due to the political, economic and military aid brought directly by the US government and the open interference in the internal affairs of our country…”
But Indonesia had different ideas. Its president Sukarno had strong views against imperialism, colonialism and capitalism, and sought to become the leader of emerging nations that had been oppressed by the above forces. The country was close to China, who participated in the 1955 Bandung Conference, a meeting held in Indonesia by mostly newly-independent Asian and African states.
Trotier writes that the Asian Games were not only meant to support Sukarno’s ideology and nation-building policy, it also “became a political message of anti-Western sentiments.”
Victor Cha, an American academic and former national policy advisor under US president George W Bush, writes that “Sukarno quietly promised Beijing that Taiwan would not be there.” Israel was also excluded because of Indonesia’s ties with its enemies.
Of course, Indonesia couldn’t do this openly. Even though Taiwan received an invitation in February 1962, its delegation never received their visas. When Taiwan’s Asia Games director Hao Keng-sheng (郝更生) flew to Indonesia in August without a visa to figure out what was going on, he was denied entry. When Indonesia officially announced Taiwan’s exclusion on Aug. 24, it blamed the decision on Hao for trying to illegally enter the country — though it was clear that it was due to “communist bandit meddling.”
The games went on as usual, and although Indonesia was suspended from the IOC, it was reinstated in April 1964 by apologizing and agreeing to abide by IOC rules.
BROTHERLY SPLIT
In the afternoon of Aug. 24, 1992, the staff of the Taiwanese embassy in Seoul held a ceremony to lower the Republic of China flag. The decision was abrupt — only a day earlier did China and South Korea “strongly suggest” that they were about to establish relations in the following few days, with Taiwan breaking off ties with South Korea in response.
“For decades, China’s ties with North Korea, and Taiwan’s relations with South Korea, were built on ideological similarities. But now, the new ties seem to be dominated by pragmatism,” the New York Times reported, citing economic factors for the switch. In 1991, trade between South Korea and Taiwan was at about US$3 billion, while the number was almost double for that with China.
In the year before ties were severed, South Korea was discouraging Taiwan from “selling consulates and the land under its embassy,” which was worth an estimated US$1.9 billion, promising that it wouldn’t jump ship, according to the New York Times. These assets were all transferred to China.
Taiwan announced that it would suspend all direct flights from South Korea and end all economic incentives. News programs aired footage of angry Taiwanese holding signs that read: “Brotherly nations? Bullshit!” and burning South Korean flags.
Rick Chu (朱立熙), a Korean expert and former Taipei Times editor-in-chief, writes in the introduction of his book Goodbye Arirang (再見阿里郎) that the severing of ties with South Korea was unprecedentedly swift, but not unexpected.
Chu writes that he spoke to a Chinese official in New York who told him that although China had already planned to establish ties with South Korea, “the Taiwan factor” hastened that realization.
“Because of Taiwan’s divisionism and diplomatic maneuvering, China felt that they needed to act as soon as possible to cut off Taiwan’s final ‘root’ in Asia,” the official says, pointing to the June 1992 reestablishment of relations between Taiwan and Niger, which only lasted for four years.
Chu writes that since the 1980s, every ambassador to South Korea knew that the “death date was close,” and took on a policy of trying to drag things out for as long as possible despite strong indication that South Korea was cozying up to China.
“Although our citizens are slightly surprised because it happened sooner than expected, and also angry, it seems that everyone also feels that a weight had been lifted off our shoulders. We finally don’t have to stoop to compromise, and give South Korea whatever it wants,” he writes.
“The problem is, what’s our next step? If one day, Taiwan’s allies dip to the single digits, what should we do?”
Chu asks in 1993 the same questions we are pondering today. And we still do not have answers as China’s power and influence continues to increase.
Taiwan in Time, a column about Taiwan’s history that is published every Sunday, spotlights important or interesting events around the nation that have anniversaries this week.
June 2 to June 8 Taiwan’s woodcutters believe that if they see even one speck of red in their cooked rice, no matter how small, an accident is going to happen. Peng Chin-tian (彭錦田) swears that this has proven to be true at every stop during his decades-long career in the logging industry. Along with mining, timber harvesting was once considered the most dangerous profession in Taiwan. Not only were mishaps common during all stages of processing, it was difficult to transport the injured to get medical treatment. Many died during the arduous journey. Peng recounts some of his accidents in
“Why does Taiwan identity decline?”a group of researchers lead by University of Nevada political scientist Austin Wang (王宏恩) asked in a recent paper. After all, it is not difficult to explain the rise in Taiwanese identity after the early 1990s. But no model predicted its decline during the 2016-2018 period, they say. After testing various alternative explanations, Wang et al argue that the fall-off in Taiwanese identity during that period is related to voter hedging based on the performance of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Since the DPP is perceived as the guardian of Taiwan identity, when it performs well,
The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on May 18 held a rally in Taichung to mark the anniversary of President William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20. The title of the rally could be loosely translated to “May 18 recall fraudulent goods” (518退貨ㄌㄨㄚˋ！). Unlike in English, where the terms are the same, “recall” (退貨) in this context refers to product recalls due to damaged, defective or fraudulent merchandise, not the political recalls (罷免) currently dominating the headlines. I attended the rally to determine if the impression was correct that the TPP under party Chairman Huang Kuo-Chang (黃國昌) had little of a
At Computex 2025, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) urged the government to subsidize AI. “All schools in Taiwan must integrate AI into their curricula,” he declared. A few months earlier, he said, “If I were a student today, I’d immediately start using tools like ChatGPT, Gemini Pro and Grok to learn, write and accelerate my thinking.” Huang sees the AI-bullet train leaving the station. And as one of its drivers, he’s worried about youth not getting on board — bad for their careers, and bad for his workforce. As a semiconductor supply-chain powerhouse and AI hub wannabe, Taiwan is seeing
RSS