Eight years after her critically acclaimed debut Bundled (我叫阿銘啦), director Singing Chen (陳芯宜) returns with her second feature, God Man Dog (流浪神狗人), an allegorical tale of contemporary Taiwan told through a mosaic of characters.
Blessed with a strong cast and production department, the film threads slices of Taiwanese life together with dreamlike visuals that linger in the mind long after the movie ends. God Man Dog has been well-received on the international film festival circuit and should also appeal to local audiences. It proves Chen, 34, is a promising, shining star among the younger generation of Taiwanese filmmakers.
The film follows the lives of characters from different ethnic groups, religious backgrounds and socioeconomic strata. It begins with Ching (Tarcy Su), a model suffering from postnatal depression who becomes increasingly estranged from her architect husband Hsiung (Chang Han) after their baby's death.
PHOTO: COURTESY OF 3RD VISION FILMS
Meanwhile, Aborigine Biung (Ulau Ugan) ekes out a living delivering fruit while attempting to cope with his alcoholism. His teenage daughter Savi (Tu Hsiao-han) escapes by becoming a kick boxer in Taipei and returns with expensive gifts after a friend enlists her in a scheme to steal money from the clients of a BDSM call-girl service.
In the third storyline, Yellow Bull (Jack Kao) drives a truck loaded with statues of deities who have been abandoned by their followers for not answering their prayers. Yellow Bull feeds stray dogs and takes in young drifter named Hsien, played by Jonathan Chang from Edward Yang's (楊德昌) Yi-Yi (一一), even though he hardly has enough money to replace his worn artificial leg. A car accident caused by a stray dog brings the three narratives together.
God Man Dog is technically accomplished and eloquently scripted. The film shows Chen as a surprisingly mature filmmaker who is able to look at the vices and virtues of Taiwanese society while telling an arresting story in a distinct style. It is an ambitious work that touches many issues, including the commodification of the body, the social problems faced by Taiwan's Aborigines, the anomie of city-dwellers, and the confused values of the young. Everything is tied together under a coherent structure by smooth editing and crosscutting between multiple characters and plot lines.
PHOTO: COURTESY OF 3RD VISION FILMS
Taiwan's collage of cultures finds a colorful epitome in Chen's vision, punctuated by the eerie sounds of a musical saw and cello by choreographer Sakamoto Hiromichi, of Hiroshima, Japan. Shen Ko-shang's (沈可尚) dynamic cinematography and atmospheric art direction by Huang Mei-ching (黃美清) help to fashion this visually imaginative film with a nod to magical realism: human-sized god puppets dancing in a deserted building, a neon-lit truck full of Buddhas wending its way through mountains under a dark sky.
On a narrative level, tragedy mixes with comedy. Storylines revolve around the film's central motif: how things are assigned value in Taiwanese society. "I reveal changing manmade values through items and things," Chen said. "Take the peach, for example. It is an expensive luxury in the eyes of Biung and his wife. In the film studio, it is merely something that can be consumed. But to Yellow Bull and Hsien, a peach is just a fruit to fill the stomach."
God Man Dog is laden with symbolism, but it is equally enjoyable for the entertainment seeker, with plenty of humorous moments of the kind that are rarely found in local productions. The most memorable of these come from the electrifying onscreen chemistry between veteran actor Kao and young Jonathan Chang. Kao shines in this film, breathing life into his Everyman role with a seemingly effortless, understated performance. Chang's equally eye-catching work suggests a star in the making. Pop idol-turned-serious actress Tarcy Su also turns in a convincing performance, although the plotline following the affluent urban couple is the film's weakest segment.
PHOTO: COURTESY OF 3RD VISION FILMS
Oct. 27 to Nov. 2 Over a breakfast of soymilk and fried dough costing less than NT$400, seven officials and engineers agreed on a NT$400 million plan — unaware that it would mark the beginning of Taiwan’s semiconductor empire. It was a cold February morning in 1974. Gathered at the unassuming shop were Economics minister Sun Yun-hsuan (孫運璿), director-general of Transportation and Communications Kao Yu-shu (高玉樹), Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) president Wang Chao-chen (王兆振), Telecommunications Laboratories director Kang Pao-huang (康寶煌), Executive Yuan secretary-general Fei Hua (費驊), director-general of Telecommunications Fang Hsien-chi (方賢齊) and Radio Corporation of America (RCA) Laboratories director Pan
The consensus on the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chair race is that Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) ran a populist, ideological back-to-basics campaign and soundly defeated former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), the candidate backed by the big institutional players. Cheng tapped into a wave of popular enthusiasm within the KMT, while the institutional players’ get-out-the-vote abilities fell flat, suggesting their power has weakened significantly. Yet, a closer look at the race paints a more complicated picture, raising questions about some analysts’ conclusions, including my own. TURNOUT Here is a surprising statistic: Turnout was 130,678, or 39.46 percent of the 331,145 eligible party
The classic warmth of a good old-fashioned izakaya beckons you in, all cozy nooks and dark wood finishes, as tables order a third round and waiters sling tapas-sized bites and assorted — sometimes unidentifiable — skewered meats. But there’s a romantic hush about this Ximending (西門町) hotspot, with cocktails savored, plating elegant and never rushed and daters and diners lit by candlelight and chandelier. Each chair is mismatched and the assorted tables appear to be the fanciest picks from a nearby flea market. A naked sewing mannequin stands in a dimly lit corner, adorned with antique mirrors and draped foliage
President William Lai (賴清德) has championed Taiwan as an “AI Island” — an artificial intelligence (AI) hub powering the global tech economy. But without major shifts in talent, funding and strategic direction, this vision risks becoming a static fortress: indispensable, yet immobile and vulnerable. It’s time to reframe Taiwan’s ambition. Time to move from a resource-rich AI island to an AI Armada. Why change metaphors? Because choosing the right metaphor shapes both understanding and strategy. The “AI Island” frames our national ambition as a static fortress that, while valuable, is still vulnerable and reactive. Shifting our metaphor to an “AI Armada”
RSS