Eight years after her critically acclaimed debut Bundled (我叫阿銘啦), director Singing Chen (陳芯宜) returns with her second feature, God Man Dog (流浪神狗人), an allegorical tale of contemporary Taiwan told through a mosaic of characters.
Blessed with a strong cast and production department, the film threads slices of Taiwanese life together with dreamlike visuals that linger in the mind long after the movie ends. God Man Dog has been well-received on the international film festival circuit and should also appeal to local audiences. It proves Chen, 34, is a promising, shining star among the younger generation of Taiwanese filmmakers.
The film follows the lives of characters from different ethnic groups, religious backgrounds and socioeconomic strata. It begins with Ching (Tarcy Su), a model suffering from postnatal depression who becomes increasingly estranged from her architect husband Hsiung (Chang Han) after their baby's death.
PHOTO: COURTESY OF 3RD VISION FILMS
Meanwhile, Aborigine Biung (Ulau Ugan) ekes out a living delivering fruit while attempting to cope with his alcoholism. His teenage daughter Savi (Tu Hsiao-han) escapes by becoming a kick boxer in Taipei and returns with expensive gifts after a friend enlists her in a scheme to steal money from the clients of a BDSM call-girl service.
In the third storyline, Yellow Bull (Jack Kao) drives a truck loaded with statues of deities who have been abandoned by their followers for not answering their prayers. Yellow Bull feeds stray dogs and takes in young drifter named Hsien, played by Jonathan Chang from Edward Yang's (楊德昌) Yi-Yi (一一), even though he hardly has enough money to replace his worn artificial leg. A car accident caused by a stray dog brings the three narratives together.
God Man Dog is technically accomplished and eloquently scripted. The film shows Chen as a surprisingly mature filmmaker who is able to look at the vices and virtues of Taiwanese society while telling an arresting story in a distinct style. It is an ambitious work that touches many issues, including the commodification of the body, the social problems faced by Taiwan's Aborigines, the anomie of city-dwellers, and the confused values of the young. Everything is tied together under a coherent structure by smooth editing and crosscutting between multiple characters and plot lines.
PHOTO: COURTESY OF 3RD VISION FILMS
Taiwan's collage of cultures finds a colorful epitome in Chen's vision, punctuated by the eerie sounds of a musical saw and cello by choreographer Sakamoto Hiromichi, of Hiroshima, Japan. Shen Ko-shang's (沈可尚) dynamic cinematography and atmospheric art direction by Huang Mei-ching (黃美清) help to fashion this visually imaginative film with a nod to magical realism: human-sized god puppets dancing in a deserted building, a neon-lit truck full of Buddhas wending its way through mountains under a dark sky.
On a narrative level, tragedy mixes with comedy. Storylines revolve around the film's central motif: how things are assigned value in Taiwanese society. "I reveal changing manmade values through items and things," Chen said. "Take the peach, for example. It is an expensive luxury in the eyes of Biung and his wife. In the film studio, it is merely something that can be consumed. But to Yellow Bull and Hsien, a peach is just a fruit to fill the stomach."
God Man Dog is laden with symbolism, but it is equally enjoyable for the entertainment seeker, with plenty of humorous moments of the kind that are rarely found in local productions. The most memorable of these come from the electrifying onscreen chemistry between veteran actor Kao and young Jonathan Chang. Kao shines in this film, breathing life into his Everyman role with a seemingly effortless, understated performance. Chang's equally eye-catching work suggests a star in the making. Pop idol-turned-serious actress Tarcy Su also turns in a convincing performance, although the plotline following the affluent urban couple is the film's weakest segment.
PHOTO: COURTESY OF 3RD VISION FILMS
If one asks Taiwanese why house prices are so high or why the nation is so built up or why certain policies cannot be carried out, one common answer is that “Taiwan is too small.” This is actually true, though not in the way people think. The National Property Administration (NPA), responsible for tracking and managing the government’s real estate assets, maintains statistics on how much land the government owns. As of the end of last year, land for official use constituted 293,655 hectares, for public use 1,732,513 hectares, for non-public use 216,972 hectares and for state enterprises 34 hectares, yielding
The small platform at Duoliang Train Station in Taitung County’s Taimali Township (太麻里) served villagers from 1992 to 2006, but was eventually shut down due to lack of use. Just 10 years later, the abandoned train station had become widely known as the most beautiful station in Taiwan, and visitors were so frequent that the village had to start restricting traffic. Nowadays, Duoliang Village (多良) is known as a bit of a tourist trap, with a mandatory, albeit modest, admission fee of NT$10 giving access to a crowded lane of vendors with a mediocre view of the ocean and the trains
Traditionally, indigenous people in Taiwan’s mountains practice swidden cultivation, or “slash and burn” agriculture, a practice common in human history. According to a 2016 research article in the International Journal of Environmental Sustainability, among the Atayal people, this began with a search for suitable forested slopeland. The trees are burnt for fertilizer and the land cleared of stones. The stones and wood are then piled up to make fences, while both dead and standing trees are retained on the plot. The fences are used to grow climbing crops like squash and beans. The plot itself supports farming for three years.
President William Lai (賴清德) on Nov. 25 last year announced in a Washington Post op-ed that “my government will introduce a historic US$40 billion supplementary defense budget, an investment that underscores our commitment to defending Taiwan’s democracy.” Lai promised “significant new arms acquisitions from the United States” and to “invest in cutting-edge technologies and expand Taiwan’s defense industrial base,” to “bolster deterrence by inserting greater costs and uncertainties into Beijing’s decision-making on the use of force.” Announcing it in the Washington Post was a strategic gamble, both geopolitically and domestically, with Taiwan’s international credibility at stake. But Lai’s message was exactly