Global oil and gas markets are in turmoil. Although prices have fluctuated with developments throughout the US and Israel against Iran conflict, increases are a certainty.
Taiwan Power Co (Taipower), through efforts on multiple fronts, earned about NT$70 billion (US$2.19 billion) last year, slightly offsetting accumulated losses of more than NT$400 billion. It had originally hoped that this year would deliver relatively stable oil and gas prices so that it could continue to generate profits and further reduce its losses, which stood at NT$357.3 billion at the end of January.
However, with the outbreak of the war, the National Security Council on March 4 introduced price stabilization measures.
Taipower and state-owned oil refiner CPC Corp, Taiwan will bear the brunt of the policies, being expected to absorb price increases while relying on debt rollover to sustain operations.
It is unclear how they will raise sufficient funds to comply with the government’s price stabilization policy.
Taipower, CPC, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) each hold substantial amounts of debt in Taiwan. The difference between them is that TSMC borrows to finance new, profitable investments, whereas Taipower and CPC borrow mainly to service debt.
For Taipower alone, annual interest expenses last year were about NT$30 billion.
Throughout last year, Taipower’s monthly balance sheets were in dire condition. In April last year, total liabilities accounted for as much as 94 percent of assets. Although the ratio declined slightly in the following months as the company began to turn a profit, it stayed above 90 percent.
Were it not a state-owned enterprise, banks would likely have long since withdrawn lending support.
The Executive Yuan had originally budgeted several hundred billion New Taiwan dollars to support Taipower’s normal operations, but legislators from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) jointly blocked the proposal. Their reasons were fourfold: Losses stem from the flawed nuclear-free homeland policy; subsidies would distort prices; Taipower requires structural reform rather than subsidies; and there are concerns about increasing the government’s fiscal burden.
The legislators’ intentions are understandable. In peacetime, partisan disputes among the KMT, the TPP and the Democratic Progressive Party might incur only minor costs, but with energy prices spiking due to the Iran situation, the disruptions to Taipower’s and CPC’s operations might have extreme effects.
With the Strait of Hormuz effectively under an Iranian blockade, countries dependent on oil and gas are scrambling to secure alternative suppliers. Taiwan, facing a disruption of more than 30 percent of its natural gas supply, is no exception.
With severely weakened balance sheets, it is unclear how CPC and Taipower can obtain sufficient financing and compete internationally for supplies.
Since the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine war, I have made repeated calls for action to make up for the substantial losses of CPC and Taipower, largely to no avail.
At this critical juncture of the US-Israel-Iran conflict, I once again urge pan-blue and white camp legislators, and the Executive Yuan to either assist CPC and Taipower in appropriately increasing prices, or to reintroduce the subsidy budget. Only by doing so can Taiwan compete in the global scramble for energy supplies, weather the natural gas shortage, and avoid power outages or gas shortages.
Liao Huei-chu is a professor in Tamkang University’s Department of Economics.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
RSS