Global oil and gas markets are in turmoil. Although prices have fluctuated with developments throughout the US and Israel against Iran conflict, increases are a certainty.
Taiwan Power Co (Taipower), through efforts on multiple fronts, earned about NT$70 billion (US$2.19 billion) last year, slightly offsetting accumulated losses of more than NT$400 billion. It had originally hoped that this year would deliver relatively stable oil and gas prices so that it could continue to generate profits and further reduce its losses, which stood at NT$357.3 billion at the end of January.
However, with the outbreak of the war, the National Security Council on March 4 introduced price stabilization measures.
Taipower and state-owned oil refiner CPC Corp, Taiwan will bear the brunt of the policies, being expected to absorb price increases while relying on debt rollover to sustain operations.
It is unclear how they will raise sufficient funds to comply with the government’s price stabilization policy.
Taipower, CPC, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) each hold substantial amounts of debt in Taiwan. The difference between them is that TSMC borrows to finance new, profitable investments, whereas Taipower and CPC borrow mainly to service debt.
For Taipower alone, annual interest expenses last year were about NT$30 billion.
Throughout last year, Taipower’s monthly balance sheets were in dire condition. In April last year, total liabilities accounted for as much as 94 percent of assets. Although the ratio declined slightly in the following months as the company began to turn a profit, it stayed above 90 percent.
Were it not a state-owned enterprise, banks would likely have long since withdrawn lending support.
The Executive Yuan had originally budgeted several hundred billion New Taiwan dollars to support Taipower’s normal operations, but legislators from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) jointly blocked the proposal. Their reasons were fourfold: Losses stem from the flawed nuclear-free homeland policy; subsidies would distort prices; Taipower requires structural reform rather than subsidies; and there are concerns about increasing the government’s fiscal burden.
The legislators’ intentions are understandable. In peacetime, partisan disputes among the KMT, the TPP and the Democratic Progressive Party might incur only minor costs, but with energy prices spiking due to the Iran situation, the disruptions to Taipower’s and CPC’s operations might have extreme effects.
With the Strait of Hormuz effectively under an Iranian blockade, countries dependent on oil and gas are scrambling to secure alternative suppliers. Taiwan, facing a disruption of more than 30 percent of its natural gas supply, is no exception.
With severely weakened balance sheets, it is unclear how CPC and Taipower can obtain sufficient financing and compete internationally for supplies.
Since the outbreak of the Russia-Ukraine war, I have made repeated calls for action to make up for the substantial losses of CPC and Taipower, largely to no avail.
At this critical juncture of the US-Israel-Iran conflict, I once again urge pan-blue and white camp legislators, and the Executive Yuan to either assist CPC and Taipower in appropriately increasing prices, or to reintroduce the subsidy budget. Only by doing so can Taiwan compete in the global scramble for energy supplies, weather the natural gas shortage, and avoid power outages or gas shortages.
Liao Huei-chu is a professor in Tamkang University’s Department of Economics.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength
RSS