Three grand justices — Tsai Tsung-jen (蔡宗珍), Yang Hui-chin (楊惠欽) and Chu Fu-mei (朱富美) — have released a five-point statement arguing that the Constitutional Court remains bound by the provisions of the Constitutional Court Procedure Act (CCPA, 憲法訴訟法) governing the quorum and voting requirements for convening and hearing cases. Amended in December last year, the act now requires at least 10 justices to hear a case and nine affirmative votes to declare a law unconstitutional, replacing the previous rule that required two-thirds of sitting justices to participate and a simple majority to reach a decision.
However, with only seven sitting justices and a deadlock in the Legislative Yuan stalling further nominations, the court has effectively been paralyzed. It seems that the justices who claim that the court is therefore unable to rule on the CCPA’s constitutionality have fallen into a circular reasoning trap.
First, the justices have argued that because the CCPA is a constitutionally authorized piece of legislation, and they are bound by the Constitution, they must abide by the CCPA and only convene the Constitutional Court under its stipulated provisions. This would be perfectly logical if the constitutionality of the CCPA itself were not in question, specifically Article 30, which sets out the new voting thresholds for judgements.
If a law is blocking itself from review, and justices do not intervene, does this not amount to legislative powers interfering in the court’s ability to carry out its constitutional function? To presume the constitutional viability of a law prior to its own review would surely be a case of judgement before trial.
Second, all valid legislation, including laws enacted under constitutional authority and those promulgated by presidential order, is subject to constitutional review. This review system allows the nullification of any law found to contravene the Constitution, as stipulated in Item 1, Article 171. Accordingly, the CCPA itself must also be open to such review. Yet the very statute whose constitutionality is in question is being invoked to block its own examination — a crisis of tautological and circular reasoning.
Third, the role of grand justices is to implement and enforce the legal hierarchy set out in Article 171 of the Constitution — their primary goal should be to uphold the Constitution as the nation’s foundational law.
It is the justices — not legislators — who interpret the spirit of the Constitution and ensure no enacted law contravenes it. The statement released by these three grand justices, appearing to capitulate to the Legislative Yuan, therefore, is puzzling and deeply concerning.
Hsu Hui-feng is a professor at CTBC Business School’s Department of Business and Economic Law.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
More than a week after Hondurans voted, the country still does not know who will be its next president. The Honduran National Electoral Council has not declared a winner, and the transmission of results has experienced repeated malfunctions that interrupted updates for almost 24 hours at times. The delay has become the second-longest post-electoral silence since the election of former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernandez of the National Party in 2017, which was tainted by accusations of fraud. Once again, this has raised concerns among observers, civil society groups and the international community. The preliminary results remain close, but both
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
RSS