The ceasefire in the Middle East is a rare cause for celebration in that war-torn region. Hamas has released all of the living hostages it captured on Oct. 7, 2023, regular combat operations have ceased, and Israel has drawn closer to its Arab neighbors. Israel, with crucial support from the United States, has achieved all of this despite concerted efforts from the forces of darkness to prevent it.
Hamas, of course, is a longtime client of Iran, which in turn is a client of China. Two years ago, when Hamas invaded Israel — killing 1,200, kidnapping 251, and brutalizing countless others — it was driven by a genocidal impulse. China, itself guilty of carrying out a genocide in Xinjiang, was quick to take Hamas’s side in the conflict, at least implicitly. Beijing never condemned the Oct. 7 attacks and never called out Hamas by name. It called for all parties to cease fighting because it wanted Hamas to survive. It turned to antisemitic and pro-Palestinian messaging in an attempt to weaken the Abraham accords and to cleave America’s Arab allies away from Washington.
It might seem counterintuitive for China to despair of Israeli victory. After all, Beijing well recognizes the instability that terrorism can cause. But that instability is exactly why Beijing took the side of evil in the Middle East. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is an agent of disorder, as are his pals in Moscow, Tehran, and Pyongyang. He believes the postwar international order — with norms favoring unhindered economic flows, the peaceful settlement of disputes, and liberal conceptions of freedom of the seas — no longer suit China’s purposes.
China aims to be a regional, if not a global, hegemon. To achieve that end, it believes it must tear down the presiding order. Xi thinks that China can excel, and most effectively dominate, in a world in which might makes right, democracies are under pressure, and mercantilism is the name of the game.
To bring about that world, Beijing acts both directly and indirectly. Its direct efforts are plain to see in its behavior toward Taiwan and in the South China Sea, in its transnational repression, in its economic exploitation of weaker partners, in its efforts to entrench political corruption overseas, in its undersea cable-cutting in Europe, and in its political warfare campaigns in democratic societies. Indirectly, Beijing cozies up to the world’s worst regimes, underwrites wars of aggression in which it has no direct stake, and throws its moral weight (such as it is) behind the likes of Hamas.
In the wake of the Oct. 7 attack, China envisioned a Middle East in which American influence was diluted, Israel was isolated, and Iran could run wild — a state of affairs that would have further undermined the rules and norms from which the world has amply benefited since World War II.
But China failed. In spite of its best efforts to sow discord and to ensure that a regimented band of rapists and murderers would prosper, Beijing achieved none of its aims. Hamas lives but is a shell of its former self. Iran has not only been chastened but defanged. American power and influence are further entrenched in the Middle East and Israel is poised for more normal — if not formal — relations with a host of countries in the Muslim world.
China’s threats to the international system are significant. It is doing real damage. But events of the past two years demonstrate that order can be successfully defended, preserved, and even improved. With the effective application of American and allied power — military force, economic leverage, and diplomatic muscle — the forces of disorder can be defeated.
Michael Mazza is senior director for research at the Institute for Indo-Pacific Security (formerly the Project 2049 Institute) and a senior non-resident fellow at the Global Taiwan Institute.
The central bank and the US Department of the Treasury on Friday issued a joint statement that both sides agreed to avoid currency manipulation and the use of exchange rates to gain a competitive advantage, and would only intervene in foreign-exchange markets to combat excess volatility and disorderly movements. The central bank also agreed to disclose its foreign-exchange intervention amounts quarterly rather than every six months, starting from next month. It emphasized that the joint statement is unrelated to tariff negotiations between Taipei and Washington, and that the US never requested the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar during the
The diplomatic dispute between China and Japan over Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s comments in the Japanese Diet continues to escalate. In a letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, China’s UN Ambassador Fu Cong (傅聰) wrote that, “if Japan dares to attempt an armed intervention in the cross-Strait situation, it would be an act of aggression.” There was no indication that Fu was aware of the irony implicit in the complaint. Until this point, Beijing had limited its remonstrations to diplomatic summonses and weaponization of economic levers, such as banning Japanese seafood imports, discouraging Chinese from traveling to Japan or issuing
Since leaving office last year, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has been journeying across continents. Her ability to connect with international audiences and foster goodwill toward her country continues to enhance understanding of Taiwan. It is possible because she can now walk through doors in Europe that are closed to President William Lai (賴清德). Tsai last week gave a speech at the Berlin Freedom Conference, where, standing in front of civil society leaders, human rights advocates and political and business figures, she highlighted Taiwan’s indispensable global role and shared its experience as a model for democratic resilience against cognitive warfare and
The diplomatic spat between China and Japan over comments Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi made on Nov. 7 continues to worsen. Beijing is angry about Takaichi’s remarks that military force used against Taiwan by the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could constitute a “survival-threatening situation” necessitating the involvement of the Japanese Self-Defense Forces. Rather than trying to reduce tensions, Beijing is looking to leverage the situation to its advantage in action and rhetoric. On Saturday last week, four armed China Coast Guard vessels sailed around the Japanese-controlled Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台), known to Japan as the Senkakus. On Friday, in what
RSS