The diplomatic spat between China and Japan over comments Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi made on Nov. 7 continues to worsen. Beijing is angry about Takaichi’s remarks that military force used against Taiwan by the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could constitute a “survival-threatening situation” necessitating the involvement of the Japanese Self-Defense Forces. Rather than trying to reduce tensions, Beijing is looking to leverage the situation to its advantage in action and rhetoric.
On Saturday last week, four armed China Coast Guard vessels sailed around the Japanese-controlled Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台), known to Japan as the Senkakus.
On Friday, in what was a transparent narrative device to exacerbate anti-Japanese feeling and create the conditions for weaponizing people-to-people exchanges, the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a travel warning to tourists and students over what it said was “a threat of violence against Chinese in Japan,” saying that Takaichi’s remarks had “put life and safety of Chinese nationals residing in Japan under enormous risks.”
Above and beyond the official diplomatic summonses from Tokyo and Beijing to officially lodge their remonstrations and displeasure, the Chinese propaganda machine was also put into operation in targeting international audiences.
In the English-language China Global Television Network program The Point, host Liu Xin (劉欣) assembled a panel of Chinese and international academics in an episode called “Why China is furious: Japan’s new PM sparks Taiwan Strait crisis.” The message expounded by the panel was scripted and systematic, and there was a real sense that this is how the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) wanted the world to understand the situation.
The panel made no mention of Chinese Consul General in Osaka Xue Jian’s (薛劍) social media post on Nov. 8, which was widely interpreted in Japan as calling for Takaichi’s beheading. There was, however, a pointed reference to the Nanjing Massacre of 1937-1938 that Xue had clearly referenced in that comment. The panel was there to paint the picture of an emerging Japanese militarism encouraged and led by the “neo-fascist” Takaichi. There was the suggestion that not just China, but all of Asia should be concerned about a return of a militaristic Japan. There was also the jibe that the China Coast Guard patrol around the Senkakus was the beginning of a “new normal” that Japan would not have wanted, but now “deserves.”
The panel also did not mention why Takaichi might have considered a potential PLA action against Taiwan to be an existential threat to Japan or how it is China’s military build-up and aggressive posturing that has many countries in the region, not just Japan or Taiwan, worried. There was no acknowledgement that the rhetoric about the supposed neo-fascist, militaristic mindset in Japan was increasing tensions and putting lives at risk.
Host and panel, in their single-minded rhetorical push, neglected that Tokyo has only in the past few years begun to discuss increasing its military spending or changes in its constitution to enable the Japanese Self-Defense Forces to be involved in joint actions beyond the purely defensive. They also ignored that the Japanese public has heretofore been opposed to those constitutional changes.
However, this is the CCP’s playbook: Behave aggressively, deny all wrongdoing, and instead distract by pointing the finger elsewhere.
On Monday, President William Lai (賴清德) urged China to restrain itself and act like a responsible major power, not a “troublemaker.”
The international community knew that it is China, not Taiwan, that is undermining cross-strait peace and stability, Lai added.
He did not mention that China does not care.
Beijing is sticking to its playbook and its carefully crafted messaging. It wants results, not friends.
Chinese state-owned companies COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Merchants have a 30 percent stake in Kaohsiung Port’s Kao Ming Container Terminal (Terminal No. 6) and COSCO leases Berths 65 and 66. It is extremely dangerous to allow Chinese companies or state-owned companies to operate critical infrastructure. Deterrence theorists are familiar with the concepts of deterrence “by punishment” and “by denial.” Deterrence by punishment threatens an aggressor with prohibitive costs (like retaliation or sanctions) that outweigh the benefits of their action, while deterrence by denial aims to make an attack so difficult that it becomes pointless. Elbridge Colby, currently serving as the Under
The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday last week said it ordered Internet service providers to block access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書, also known as RedNote in English) for a year, citing security risks and more than 1,700 alleged fraud cases on the platform since last year. The order took effect immediately, abruptly affecting more than 3 million users in Taiwan, and sparked discussions among politicians, online influencers and the public. The platform is often described as China’s version of Instagram or Pinterest, combining visual social media with e-commerce, and its users are predominantly young urban women,
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi lit a fuse the moment she declared that trouble for Taiwan means trouble for Japan. Beijing roared, Tokyo braced and like a plot twist nobody expected that early in the story, US President Donald Trump suddenly picked up the phone to talk to her. For a man who normally prefers to keep Asia guessing, the move itself was striking. What followed was even more intriguing. No one outside the room knows the exact phrasing, the tone or the diplomatic eyebrow raises exchanged, but the broad takeaway circulating among people familiar with the call was this: Trump did