A Reuters report published this week highlighted the struggles of migrant mothers in Taiwan through the story of Marian Duhapa, a Filipina forced to leave her infant behind to work in Taiwan and support her family.
After becoming pregnant in Taiwan last year, Duhapa lost her job and lived in a shelter before giving birth and taking her daughter back to the Philippines. She then returned to Taiwan for a second time on her own to find work. Duhapa’s sacrifice is one of countless examples among the hundreds of thousands of migrant workers who sustain many of Taiwan’s households and factories, despite remaining largely unprotected under the law. Women from Indonesia, Vietnam, the Philippines and Thailand make up about half of Taiwan’s more than 800,000 migrant workers, many of whom leave children and families behind to provide for them financially.
For those who become pregnant while in Taiwan, motherhood comes at a cost. An estimated 6,000 migrant workers become pregnant each year; data from the Bureau of Labor Insurance show that nearly 80 percent of industrial migrant workers end their contracts and return home after becoming pregnant, rarely voluntarily.
In a United Daily News report published in January, Indonesian migrant worker Xiaomi recounted being coerced by her broker into signing a “voluntary” resignation letter after becoming pregnant. The document was written in Chinese and she was barred from taking a photograph of it or seeking advice prior to signing.
The Gender Equality in Employment Act (性別平等工作法) forbids employers from citing pregnancy, childbirth or childcare as grounds for terminating a contract, yet, for years, advocacy groups have documented similar accounts across industries, exposing an entrenched pattern of coercion, misinformation and intimidation that drives many female migrant workers to quit their jobs or conceal their pregnancies.
The problem partially stems from loopholes that allow brokers and employers to exploit gray areas in labor laws. While firing a worker for becoming pregnant is illegal, coercing her to resign and framing it as “voluntary” often goes unpunished.
Government oversight is lacking and the system relies heavily on self-reporting through the 1955 hotline — a risky option for migrant workers fearing retaliation or job loss.
To make matters worse, most migrant workers — particularly domestic caregivers — are excluded from the Labor Standards Act (勞動基準法) and not reflected in official statistics. The true scale of the problem is likely far greater than what is visible.
Taiwan’s rapidly aging population and declining birthrate are expected to deepen labor shortages and economic strain. President William Lai’s (賴清德) proposal to ease requirements for hiring foreign caregivers to encourage childbirth confirms this reality — Taiwan needs its migrant workers, and will continue to need them even more in the years ahead.
Why, then, are female migrant workers discouraged from staying in the nation and raising families of their own? It is deeply hypocritical for a nation that prides itself as a beacon of democracy and human rights to turn a blind eye to the exploitation of people whose labor helps carry the economy and care for its most vulnerable.
If the government is serious about addressing the nation’s demographic and labor crises, and safeguarding its international image, it must stop dragging its feet and enact reforms that protect migrant workers from discrimination, hold employers and brokers accountable, and guarantee that no woman of any nationality loses her livelihood simply because she chooses to have a child.
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto says he knows how to fix the problems facing Indonesia. Yet his economic mismanagement and authoritarian tendencies are steering the nation toward a familiar mix of currency instability and political chaos. The world’s fourth-most populous nation risks reversing the hard-won democratic and business reforms that came after the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997. At that time, the rupiah collapsed and the political upheaval that followed forced former president Haji Mohamed Suharto from power. Prabowo’s administration is ignoring similar warning signs. That disconnect was apparent in a national address on Wednesday, when Prabowo projected the swagger that has
“Of course you can choose not to be Taiwanese, just do not stay here,” chairwoman of Taipei 101 operator Taipei Financial Center Corp Janet Chia (賈永婕) said in an online interview with local entertainer Tai Chih-yuan (邰智源), triggering intense discussion on social media, with politicians across party lines weighing in. In the interview, which was aired on May 14, Chia and Tai’s discussion over a meal in Taipei 101 covered Chia’s career change from entertainer to chairwoman and US climber Alex Honnold’s free solo climb up the Taipei 101 building. During the interview, Chia said, “Being on this land, we