US President Donald Trump has said that he plans to impose substantial tariffs on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals to force companies to move production from Taiwan and around the world to the US. He also said the US economy could be boosted by US$20 trillion by the end of this year, in large part due to companies moving their operations to the US to avoid tariffs.
While Trump’s tariffs face legal challenges, the US president has maintained that his “America First” trade stance would spur more domestic manufacturing and reshoring of important industries to the US. Yet, Trump’s protectionist policies have stirred significant turmoil in global supply chains and, for Taiwan in particular, it has raised concerns about whether semiconductor investment in the US and local manufacturers’ expansions overseas would reduce their operations at home, leading to an outflow of talent and the hollowing out of local industries.
National Development Council Minister Yeh Chun-hsien (葉俊顯) last week downplayed such concerns. Taiwan’s tech investment in the US is not about carving off part of its industry, but simply duplicating its development in a new location, he told a meeting of the legislature’s Economics Committee. A critical mistake of the US’ trade policies of the 1980s was in shifting a portion of its manufacturing to Southeast Asia, Yeh said. Taiwan seeks to retain manufacturing, especially critical and advanced manufacturing, while helping the US cultivate its talent pool, he added.
Manufacturers around the world are contending with the complex decision of shifting supply chains to avoid high US tariffs, and Taiwanese companies are no exception. With a declining birthrate, the nation is no longer able to shore up a large labor base in manufacturing, and the US’ tariffs give firms a motive to relocate abroad. That movement would create a short-term crisis of reduced exports, job losses and less manufacturing in some parts of Taiwan. Small and medium-sized enterprises in southern and central Taiwan would be particularly affected.
However, Pegatron Corp chairman Tung Tzu-hsien (童子賢) remains confident in Taiwan’s industrial competitiveness. At a semiconductor conference last week, Tung said that previous overseas expansions of Taiwanese firms did not hollow out local industries, but helped enhance companies’ capabilities and grow Taiwan’s influence on a global stage, because the core of research and development and the decisionmaking remain in Taiwan.
In the 1980s, Taiwan’s traditional industries, such as plastics and textiles, led the first wave of relocation to China due to the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar, followed by upstream and midstream raw material suppliers. In about 2000, the same pattern of relocation emerged in the information and communications technology industry. However, the waves of relocation have not created a hollowing-out effect on Taiwan’s domestic industrial base, but instead have ushered in a wave of booming new industries. Intermediate goods, such as key electronic components and semiconductors, have also become the new main export items and new markets for Taiwan-made goods have been created.
A speedier relocation of Taiwanese firms could occur this time, as higher and broader US tariffs might prompt more manufacturers to expand their presence in alternative, lower-tariffed markets. As long as Taiwan retains critical technology and advanced manufacturing at home, harbors an environment conducive to the development of newer and more dynamic companies here, and further develops the EU and emerging markets to reduce dependence on a single market, while firms’ technological innovations, such as artificial intelligence and robotics, in Taiwan can outgrow their pace of relocation, the crisis could be converted into an opportunity for Taiwan’s industries.
The US Senate’s passage of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which urges Taiwan’s inclusion in the Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise and allocates US$1 billion in military aid, marks yet another milestone in Washington’s growing support for Taipei. On paper, it reflects the steadiness of US commitment, but beneath this show of solidarity lies contradiction. While the US Congress builds a stable, bipartisan architecture of deterrence, US President Donald Trump repeatedly undercuts it through erratic decisions and transactional diplomacy. This dissonance not only weakens the US’ credibility abroad — it also fractures public trust within Taiwan. For decades,
In 1976, the Gang of Four was ousted. The Gang of Four was a leftist political group comprising Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members: Jiang Qing (江青), its leading figure and Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) last wife; Zhang Chunqiao (張春橋); Yao Wenyuan (姚文元); and Wang Hongwen (王洪文). The four wielded supreme power during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), but when Mao died, they were overthrown and charged with crimes against China in what was in essence a political coup of the right against the left. The same type of thing might be happening again as the CCP has expelled nine top generals. Rather than a
The ceasefire in the Middle East is a rare cause for celebration in that war-torn region. Hamas has released all of the living hostages it captured on Oct. 7, 2023, regular combat operations have ceased, and Israel has drawn closer to its Arab neighbors. Israel, with crucial support from the United States, has achieved all of this despite concerted efforts from the forces of darkness to prevent it. Hamas, of course, is a longtime client of Iran, which in turn is a client of China. Two years ago, when Hamas invaded Israel — killing 1,200, kidnapping 251, and brutalizing countless others
A Reuters report published this week highlighted the struggles of migrant mothers in Taiwan through the story of Marian Duhapa, a Filipina forced to leave her infant behind to work in Taiwan and support her family. After becoming pregnant in Taiwan last year, Duhapa lost her job and lived in a shelter before giving birth and taking her daughter back to the Philippines. She then returned to Taiwan for a second time on her own to find work. Duhapa’s sacrifice is one of countless examples among the hundreds of thousands of migrant workers who sustain many of Taiwan’s households and factories,