US President Donald Trump has said that he plans to impose substantial tariffs on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals to force companies to move production from Taiwan and around the world to the US. He also said the US economy could be boosted by US$20 trillion by the end of this year, in large part due to companies moving their operations to the US to avoid tariffs.
While Trump’s tariffs face legal challenges, the US president has maintained that his “America First” trade stance would spur more domestic manufacturing and reshoring of important industries to the US. Yet, Trump’s protectionist policies have stirred significant turmoil in global supply chains and, for Taiwan in particular, it has raised concerns about whether semiconductor investment in the US and local manufacturers’ expansions overseas would reduce their operations at home, leading to an outflow of talent and the hollowing out of local industries.
National Development Council Minister Yeh Chun-hsien (葉俊顯) last week downplayed such concerns. Taiwan’s tech investment in the US is not about carving off part of its industry, but simply duplicating its development in a new location, he told a meeting of the legislature’s Economics Committee. A critical mistake of the US’ trade policies of the 1980s was in shifting a portion of its manufacturing to Southeast Asia, Yeh said. Taiwan seeks to retain manufacturing, especially critical and advanced manufacturing, while helping the US cultivate its talent pool, he added.
Manufacturers around the world are contending with the complex decision of shifting supply chains to avoid high US tariffs, and Taiwanese companies are no exception. With a declining birthrate, the nation is no longer able to shore up a large labor base in manufacturing, and the US’ tariffs give firms a motive to relocate abroad. That movement would create a short-term crisis of reduced exports, job losses and less manufacturing in some parts of Taiwan. Small and medium-sized enterprises in southern and central Taiwan would be particularly affected.
However, Pegatron Corp chairman Tung Tzu-hsien (童子賢) remains confident in Taiwan’s industrial competitiveness. At a semiconductor conference last week, Tung said that previous overseas expansions of Taiwanese firms did not hollow out local industries, but helped enhance companies’ capabilities and grow Taiwan’s influence on a global stage, because the core of research and development and the decisionmaking remain in Taiwan.
In the 1980s, Taiwan’s traditional industries, such as plastics and textiles, led the first wave of relocation to China due to the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar, followed by upstream and midstream raw material suppliers. In about 2000, the same pattern of relocation emerged in the information and communications technology industry. However, the waves of relocation have not created a hollowing-out effect on Taiwan’s domestic industrial base, but instead have ushered in a wave of booming new industries. Intermediate goods, such as key electronic components and semiconductors, have also become the new main export items and new markets for Taiwan-made goods have been created.
A speedier relocation of Taiwanese firms could occur this time, as higher and broader US tariffs might prompt more manufacturers to expand their presence in alternative, lower-tariffed markets. As long as Taiwan retains critical technology and advanced manufacturing at home, harbors an environment conducive to the development of newer and more dynamic companies here, and further develops the EU and emerging markets to reduce dependence on a single market, while firms’ technological innovations, such as artificial intelligence and robotics, in Taiwan can outgrow their pace of relocation, the crisis could be converted into an opportunity for Taiwan’s industries.
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS