Amid a flurry of news from US President Donald Trump’s White House that has raised questions about Washington’s commitment to Taiwan’s security, overseas Taiwanese groups have been working the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue to codify support for the democratic nation into US law.
At the forefront of what has been a cross-generational effort is the Formosan Association for Public Affairs (FAPA), one of Washington’s oldest Taiwanese-American advocacy organizations.
Founded more than four decades ago, its official vision statement is that “a free, democratic, independent and sovereign Taiwan is essential to peace and security for the United States, Taiwan and the Indo-Pacific region.” FAPA has long cultivated bipartisan support, playing a pivotal role in the formation of the Taiwan caucuses in both chambers of the US Congress.
Trump’s alleged denial of President William Lai’s (賴清德) New York transit and his blocking of US$400 million in military aid ahead of talks with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), as well as the downgrading of military talks with Taiwan, have raised concerns about how far US presidents can go when pushed by Chinese demands.
Observers have long cited the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) and the “six assurances” as the cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. However, while the TRA carries the force of law, the “six assurances,” first adopted by then-US president Ronald Reagan in 1982, are only government policy. Although in place for nearly half a century, it can still be scrapped should a US administration choose so. Codifying the “six assurances” would guarantee no end date for arms sales to Taiwan, no consultation with Beijing on such sales and no US mediation in Taiwan-China disputes, regardless of who sits in the Oval Office.
FAPA’s efforts have seen progress. Earlier this month, the US House Committee on Foreign Affairs advanced the Six Assurances to Taiwan Act and the Taiwan Allies Fund Act. The group is also working with US senators to pass the Providing Our Regional Companions Upgraded Protection in Nefarious Environments (PORCUPINE) Act. Should these pass, they would simplify the arms sales process, which would help expedite deliveries to Taiwan by granting it the same treatment as NATO Plus countries.
FAPA president Kao Su-mei (林素梅) said that support for Taiwan has always been rooted in a decades-long grassroots movement, mobilizing communities across generations and regions around a shared commitment to freedom, democracy and human rights.
She said the organization has gained new momentum by opening its doors to all who share the goal of defending Taiwan and its democracy.
That momentum is visible at the chapter level. Tim Chng (莊騰程), president of FAPA’s Maryland chapter, said membership has expanded among younger generations with diverse political views. He said that Xi’s increasing military aggression and coercive actions — including Chinese drilling in Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone — have drawn in new members, even from families that have traditionally supported the China-friendly Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT).
To raise awareness in US political circles, Taiwanese-American advocates have also become more creative. This year, FAPA’s long-running Emerging Leaders Workshop, traditionally held in Washington, was hosted in Taipei for the first time.
Executive director Anny Hsiao (蕭喬勻) said the shift was designed to enable the next generation of policy professionals to engage directly with Taiwan, meeting its people, experiencing its democracy and gaining firsthand insight into the security challenges it faces.
Hsiao said that once the participants return to Washington, they would be better equipped to shape policies that safeguard Taiwan’s long-term future and strengthen US strategy and deterrence in the Indo-Pacific region.
The program, which in previous years brought young Taiwanese policymakers and analysts to the Beltway, this time exposed emerging US policy influencers to Taiwan’s democracy on the ground.
They met with Vice President Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴), crisscrossing Taiwan to visit different branches of government, think tanks, semiconductor fabs and others across public, business and civil society.
Such US-based Taiwanese diaspora groups are working to translate the already broad bipartisan consensus on Taiwan into law. By doing so, they aim to remove vulnerabilities that Chinese disinformation campaigns often exploit, such as the hypothetical notion that a future US administration might consider “Taiwan being up for sale,” and in doing so, secure long-term deterrence.
Rath Wang is a senior policy fellow at Safe Spaces, a consulting firm based in Taipei and Washington focusing on Taiwan’s politics, media, civil society, and key issues influencing Taiwan’s future. He is a producer and host of political talk shows and podcasts and has worked on political campaigns and advocacies in Taiwan and the US. He can be reached at rathwang@safespacesllc.com.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,