The Executive Yuan on Tuesday last week said that “unsolvable” problems and mistakes in the amended Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) have prevented the central government from disbursing NT$34.5 billion (US$1.15 billion) to local governments.
Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) led 14 heads of administrative regions in confronting the Executive Yuan over this issue, according to media reports.
Last year, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) joined hands in the Legislative Yuan, using their majority to forcefully pass the amendment by means inconsistent with procedural justice. Now that things have gone awry, the responsibility should lie with them. In attacking the Executive Yuan, Lu and the other mayors have chosen the wrong target. It was clearly KMT and TPP legislators who pushed the amendment through, so why are the true culprits not being held accountable?
Lu has already played this kind of political theater during the controversy over air pollution caused by the Taichung Power Plant. Prior to taking office, Lu repeatedly attacked the plant, saying that Taichung has the worst air pollution in Taiwan. On her first day in office, she even handed out “Guguan air bottle” gifts to voters as a symbol of her plans to improve the city’s air quality, vowing it would be as clear as the mountain air of Guguan (谷關) — an act that left behind a large amount of plastic waste and cost NT$300,000. Taichung Power Plant, the world’s fourth-largest thermal power plant, began construction in 1986 and started operation in 1992 — all during the KMT’s rule. However, Lu does not criticize the KMT, and is instead shifting the blame onto the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
Over the past few years under DPP administrations, the proportion of renewable energy in Taiwan’s energy mix has continued to steadily increase. Solar and wind energy have grown rapidly, fully meeting Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s green energy needs — yet Lu has failed to mention any of this. She once called for emulating the US’ model of “cocktail-style” power generation, but the reality is that she opposes all forms of energy — she is against thermal power, has criticized wind energy subsidies, accused solar farms of destroying farm land, and rejected both restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County and extending the operations of other nuclear plants. She has also criticized the plan to install gas-fired generators at the Taichung plant, citing concerns over pollution and safety. It seems like Lu’s energy “cocktail” is nothing but foam — an empty joke, just like her Guguan air bottles.
Also, does Lu respect the US? In Dec. 2020, former American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) director Brent Christensen led a delegation to visit the Taichung City Government. Although both parties had agreed to hold a closed-door meeting, Lu’s administration turned the event into a public briefing. In front of the cameras, she expressed opposition to the importation of US pork with traces of ractopamine and even cited false information to smear US products. That same evening, then-AIT spokeswoman Amanda Mansour issued a statement affirming the unquestionable safety of US products and propagation of disinformation on behalf of politicians, saying it raises “unfounded anxiety among Taiwan consumers” and is “a disservice to everyone.”
How many diplomatic landmines has Lu stepped on? She contravened an agreement and publicly embarrassed an ally — this is just one example of her “mother-style” diplomacy.
Public safety is a vital measure of a city’s governance. Earlier this year, a gas explosion at Shin Kong Mitsukoshi Department Store in Taichung left five dead and 38 injured. In December last year, a factory fire in Taichung’s Dadu District (大肚) claimed nine lives and injured eight others. To this day, the city government has failed to provide detailed explanations and reform plans in light of these incidents. Even pro-KMT media outlets have criticized the city government’s lack of follow-up mechanisms. No matter what political position “Mother Lu” runs for in the future, the public would remember these controversies.
Liou Je-wei is a teacher.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS