The Executive Yuan on Tuesday last week said that “unsolvable” problems and mistakes in the amended Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) have prevented the central government from disbursing NT$34.5 billion (US$1.15 billion) to local governments.
Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) led 14 heads of administrative regions in confronting the Executive Yuan over this issue, according to media reports.
Last year, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) joined hands in the Legislative Yuan, using their majority to forcefully pass the amendment by means inconsistent with procedural justice. Now that things have gone awry, the responsibility should lie with them. In attacking the Executive Yuan, Lu and the other mayors have chosen the wrong target. It was clearly KMT and TPP legislators who pushed the amendment through, so why are the true culprits not being held accountable?
Lu has already played this kind of political theater during the controversy over air pollution caused by the Taichung Power Plant. Prior to taking office, Lu repeatedly attacked the plant, saying that Taichung has the worst air pollution in Taiwan. On her first day in office, she even handed out “Guguan air bottle” gifts to voters as a symbol of her plans to improve the city’s air quality, vowing it would be as clear as the mountain air of Guguan (谷關) — an act that left behind a large amount of plastic waste and cost NT$300,000. Taichung Power Plant, the world’s fourth-largest thermal power plant, began construction in 1986 and started operation in 1992 — all during the KMT’s rule. However, Lu does not criticize the KMT, and is instead shifting the blame onto the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
Over the past few years under DPP administrations, the proportion of renewable energy in Taiwan’s energy mix has continued to steadily increase. Solar and wind energy have grown rapidly, fully meeting Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s green energy needs — yet Lu has failed to mention any of this. She once called for emulating the US’ model of “cocktail-style” power generation, but the reality is that she opposes all forms of energy — she is against thermal power, has criticized wind energy subsidies, accused solar farms of destroying farm land, and rejected both restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County and extending the operations of other nuclear plants. She has also criticized the plan to install gas-fired generators at the Taichung plant, citing concerns over pollution and safety. It seems like Lu’s energy “cocktail” is nothing but foam — an empty joke, just like her Guguan air bottles.
Also, does Lu respect the US? In Dec. 2020, former American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) director Brent Christensen led a delegation to visit the Taichung City Government. Although both parties had agreed to hold a closed-door meeting, Lu’s administration turned the event into a public briefing. In front of the cameras, she expressed opposition to the importation of US pork with traces of ractopamine and even cited false information to smear US products. That same evening, then-AIT spokeswoman Amanda Mansour issued a statement affirming the unquestionable safety of US products and propagation of disinformation on behalf of politicians, saying it raises “unfounded anxiety among Taiwan consumers” and is “a disservice to everyone.”
How many diplomatic landmines has Lu stepped on? She contravened an agreement and publicly embarrassed an ally — this is just one example of her “mother-style” diplomacy.
Public safety is a vital measure of a city’s governance. Earlier this year, a gas explosion at Shin Kong Mitsukoshi Department Store in Taichung left five dead and 38 injured. In December last year, a factory fire in Taichung’s Dadu District (大肚) claimed nine lives and injured eight others. To this day, the city government has failed to provide detailed explanations and reform plans in light of these incidents. Even pro-KMT media outlets have criticized the city government’s lack of follow-up mechanisms. No matter what political position “Mother Lu” runs for in the future, the public would remember these controversies.
Liou Je-wei is a teacher.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The US Senate’s passage of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which urges Taiwan’s inclusion in the Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise and allocates US$1 billion in military aid, marks yet another milestone in Washington’s growing support for Taipei. On paper, it reflects the steadiness of US commitment, but beneath this show of solidarity lies contradiction. While the US Congress builds a stable, bipartisan architecture of deterrence, US President Donald Trump repeatedly undercuts it through erratic decisions and transactional diplomacy. This dissonance not only weakens the US’ credibility abroad — it also fractures public trust within Taiwan. For decades,
In 1976, the Gang of Four was ousted. The Gang of Four was a leftist political group comprising Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members: Jiang Qing (江青), its leading figure and Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) last wife; Zhang Chunqiao (張春橋); Yao Wenyuan (姚文元); and Wang Hongwen (王洪文). The four wielded supreme power during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), but when Mao died, they were overthrown and charged with crimes against China in what was in essence a political coup of the right against the left. The same type of thing might be happening again as the CCP has expelled nine top generals. Rather than a
The ceasefire in the Middle East is a rare cause for celebration in that war-torn region. Hamas has released all of the living hostages it captured on Oct. 7, 2023, regular combat operations have ceased, and Israel has drawn closer to its Arab neighbors. Israel, with crucial support from the United States, has achieved all of this despite concerted efforts from the forces of darkness to prevent it. Hamas, of course, is a longtime client of Iran, which in turn is a client of China. Two years ago, when Hamas invaded Israel — killing 1,200, kidnapping 251, and brutalizing countless others
A Reuters report published this week highlighted the struggles of migrant mothers in Taiwan through the story of Marian Duhapa, a Filipina forced to leave her infant behind to work in Taiwan and support her family. After becoming pregnant in Taiwan last year, Duhapa lost her job and lived in a shelter before giving birth and taking her daughter back to the Philippines. She then returned to Taiwan for a second time on her own to find work. Duhapa’s sacrifice is one of countless examples among the hundreds of thousands of migrant workers who sustain many of Taiwan’s households and factories,
RSS