The Executive Yuan on Tuesday last week said that “unsolvable” problems and mistakes in the amended Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法) have prevented the central government from disbursing NT$34.5 billion (US$1.15 billion) to local governments.
Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) led 14 heads of administrative regions in confronting the Executive Yuan over this issue, according to media reports.
Last year, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) joined hands in the Legislative Yuan, using their majority to forcefully pass the amendment by means inconsistent with procedural justice. Now that things have gone awry, the responsibility should lie with them. In attacking the Executive Yuan, Lu and the other mayors have chosen the wrong target. It was clearly KMT and TPP legislators who pushed the amendment through, so why are the true culprits not being held accountable?
Lu has already played this kind of political theater during the controversy over air pollution caused by the Taichung Power Plant. Prior to taking office, Lu repeatedly attacked the plant, saying that Taichung has the worst air pollution in Taiwan. On her first day in office, she even handed out “Guguan air bottle” gifts to voters as a symbol of her plans to improve the city’s air quality, vowing it would be as clear as the mountain air of Guguan (谷關) — an act that left behind a large amount of plastic waste and cost NT$300,000. Taichung Power Plant, the world’s fourth-largest thermal power plant, began construction in 1986 and started operation in 1992 — all during the KMT’s rule. However, Lu does not criticize the KMT, and is instead shifting the blame onto the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
Over the past few years under DPP administrations, the proportion of renewable energy in Taiwan’s energy mix has continued to steadily increase. Solar and wind energy have grown rapidly, fully meeting Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s green energy needs — yet Lu has failed to mention any of this. She once called for emulating the US’ model of “cocktail-style” power generation, but the reality is that she opposes all forms of energy — she is against thermal power, has criticized wind energy subsidies, accused solar farms of destroying farm land, and rejected both restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County and extending the operations of other nuclear plants. She has also criticized the plan to install gas-fired generators at the Taichung plant, citing concerns over pollution and safety. It seems like Lu’s energy “cocktail” is nothing but foam — an empty joke, just like her Guguan air bottles.
Also, does Lu respect the US? In Dec. 2020, former American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) director Brent Christensen led a delegation to visit the Taichung City Government. Although both parties had agreed to hold a closed-door meeting, Lu’s administration turned the event into a public briefing. In front of the cameras, she expressed opposition to the importation of US pork with traces of ractopamine and even cited false information to smear US products. That same evening, then-AIT spokeswoman Amanda Mansour issued a statement affirming the unquestionable safety of US products and propagation of disinformation on behalf of politicians, saying it raises “unfounded anxiety among Taiwan consumers” and is “a disservice to everyone.”
How many diplomatic landmines has Lu stepped on? She contravened an agreement and publicly embarrassed an ally — this is just one example of her “mother-style” diplomacy.
Public safety is a vital measure of a city’s governance. Earlier this year, a gas explosion at Shin Kong Mitsukoshi Department Store in Taichung left five dead and 38 injured. In December last year, a factory fire in Taichung’s Dadu District (大肚) claimed nine lives and injured eight others. To this day, the city government has failed to provide detailed explanations and reform plans in light of these incidents. Even pro-KMT media outlets have criticized the city government’s lack of follow-up mechanisms. No matter what political position “Mother Lu” runs for in the future, the public would remember these controversies.
Liou Je-wei is a teacher.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS