Taiwan’s life insurance companies swung into profit last month, thanks to new measures by the Financial Supervisory Commission allowing insurers to access extra policy reserves to offset exchange rate losses, as well as the contribution of capital gains and dividend income, and the stabilization of the New Taiwan dollar.
Based on regulatory filings released earlier this month, the nation’s six biggest life insurers — Cathay Life Insurance Co, Nan Shan Life Insurance Co, Fubon Life Insurance Co, Taiwan Life Insurance Co, KGI Life Insurance Co and Shin Kong Life Insurance Co — posted combined profits of NT$31.2 billion (US$1.06 billion) for last month, reversing May’s losses of NT$34.9 billion amid the sharp appreciation of the NT dollar against the US dollar.
Many local life insurers hold large portfolios of US dollar-denominated fixed-income assets while funding liabilities in NT dollars. The currency mismatch leaves them vulnerable to a rapid appreciation of the local currency. In early May, the NT dollar surged 8 percent against the US dollar, driving up insurers’ hedging costs and depleting their policy reserves. That month alone, the NT dollar spiked 6.98 percent against the greenback — the largest monthly increase since April 1989 — which caused the valuation of insurers’ US dollar-denominated assets to shrink substantially and affected their profits.
Despite an improvement in profits last month and reduced pressure from foreign-exchange losses, as the NT dollar appreciated just 0.09 percent against the US dollar, the six life insurers still registered a significant decline in profits in the first half of this year, down 78 percent year-on-year to NT$36.04 billion. If not for a 31.77 percent annual increase in first-year premiums to NT$302.13 billion in the first six months, the big insurers would have posted an even larger drop in profits, data released last week by the Life Insurance Association showed.
Insurers’ improved bottom lines might help calm the market while giving firms a breather from the volatile foreign exchange environment, but it is by no means a sign of peace ahead, as long as uncertainty remains about potential US tariffs on Taiwan. For all financial institutions — including banks, insurers, securities and futures brokerages, and investment trusts — the effects of exchange rate fluctuations are the most difficult change to grasp and pose a major risk to their operations.
With the NT dollar’s 3.64 percent appreciation in April and 6.98 percent in May against the greenback, the resulting foreign exchange losses almost wiped out most of the profits they made in the first five months of this year.
Data released at the end of last month showed that financial institutions’ combined pretax profits decreased 51.9 percent to NT$232.78 billion from a year earlier, which far exceeded expectations. It has especially become more difficult for financial institutions to predict the long-term trend of the local currency, as its price fluctuations versus the US dollar has been more frequent and dramatic over the past few years.
An urgent challenge facing Taiwan’s life insurers is the serious currency mismatch problem, which is not common in other countries. A mismatch between the currencies in which insurers’ assets and liabilities are held can put pressure on their capital and earnings. The root cause is that there are too few options to invest in Taiwan, prompting insurers to move funds abroad, mostly investing in US dollar-denominated assets.
In the short term, insurers could increase sales of US dollar-denominated policies, as they provide another form of natural hedging to ease potential risks. Over the longer term, insurers must still adjust their risk management strategies and diversify their investment portfolios, as the risk of the local currency rising further still exists.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS