The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) was born of discontent. Many young voters, exhausted by the endless blue-green gridlock, turned to this so-called “third force” in hopes of pragmatic politics, clean governance and a focus on everyday struggles — such as housing, wages and affordability. In 2020 and again last year, they placed their trust in the TPP out of a desperate belief that something different had to be better.
However, since early last year, what once seemed like fresh air has been revealed to be a staleness that is all too familiar.
The TPP has found itself holding the balance of power in the Legislative Yuan. However, rather than using that leverage to mediate between parties or advance practical reforms, the TPP aligned itself entirely with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) — a party widely regarded as Beijing’s favored proxy. Together, the TPP and KMT have rammed through controversial legislative reforms, expanded legislative oversight powers to undermine the executive branch and blocked the Democratic Progressive Party government on critical national issues ranging from defense to energy.
This is not principled centrism. It is sabotage wrapped in technocratic packaging, leaving many young voters who once identified with the TPP disillusioned and betrayed.
Democracy requires negotiation and compromise. No party deserves a blank check. What has unfolded since February last year is not power-sharing — it is power-hijacking: A coordinated effort by the KMT and the TPP to paralyze the elected government, erode institutional checks and balances, and impose unpopular legislation without public consent.
That is not just cynical. It is corrosive.
What makes it worse is the nature of the TPP’s power. Of its eight legislators, all are at-large party list appointees. They were not elected by any district. They cannot be recalled. They face no local accountability. They operate without the check of constituency pressure, yet hold the swing votes that now define Taiwan’s legislative outcomes.
Voters who feel betrayed by the TPP’s post-election alliance with the KMT are left powerless.
Former TPP chairman and Taipei mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), once the party’s figurehead of reform, is now facing corruption charges tied to his mayorship. However, it is his successor, Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), who is proving to be far more dangerous. Once a leader of the Sunflower movement, Huang has turned into something unrecognizable: a hardliner with little patience for dissent and even less regard for democratic norms.
His role in the recent artificial intelligence tape scandal — where manipulated audio was used to damage political opponents — should have triggered soul-searching. Instead, Huang stonewalled. He provided no real apology or acknowledgment of ethical boundaries crossed. He just delivered more legal threats, media scorn and finger-pointing.
Huang has championed the KMT-TPP “reforms” rammed through the legislature in May last year — which were denounced by legal academics and civic groups as unconstitutional. When citizens poured into Ketagalan Boulevard in protest, Huang dismissed them as misled or manipulated. Civic outrage was treated not as democratic expression, but as political noise.
His tone is increasingly authoritarian — weaponizing “legislative supremacy,” ridiculing journalists, silencing academics and sidelining watchdog groups. It is beginning to mirror the exact autocratic tendencies Taiwan has always stood against.
For those who backed the TPP in the name of party rotation, think again. Yes, alternation of power is a democratic feature — but it is not democracy’s purpose. Elevating party rotation as a virtue in itself is simplistic, even reckless. In any system, blind rotation invites instability. In Taiwan, under the looming threat of China, it can invite disaster. When a shift in domestic politics begins to undermine national security, the pursuit of change for its own sake becomes not just misguided, but dangerous.
The next time a party asks for your vote in the name of being different, ask what that really means, because “different” is not always better. In the TPP’s case, it is turning out to be more cynical, manipulative and aligned with everything Taiwan cannot afford to become.
There is a way for voters — especially those who feel betrayed by the TPP — to make their voice heard. On July 26, Taiwan is to hold recall voting targeting KMT legislators. This is no ordinary election. It is an opportunity for disillusioned TPP supporters to act. You cannot recall TPP legislators directly, but you can recall their enablers.
John Cheng is a retired businessman from Hong Kong now living in Taiwan.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
To counter the CCP’s escalating threats, Taiwan must build a national consensus and demonstrate the capability and the will to fight. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) often leans on a seductive mantra to soften its threats, such as “Chinese do not kill Chinese.” The slogan is designed to frame territorial conquest (annexation) as a domestic family matter. A look at the historical ledger reveals a different truth. For the CCP, being labeled “family” has never been a guarantee of safety; it has been the primary prerequisite for state-sanctioned slaughter. From the forced starvation of 150,000 civilians at the Siege of Changchun
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking
RSS