Singapore figured it had done a lot right in handling commercial ties with the US. Leaders emphasized the US’ surplus and put huge store in the nations’ two-decade-old free trade accord. When US President Donald Trump hit the city-state with a 10 percent levy, it was small comfort that the penalty was so much lower than that imposed on neighbors. How can longtime partners put a traditionally strong relationship back on track?
So, when former Australian prime minister Malcolm Turnbull was asked a similar question at a Nomura conference in Singapore last month, the hotel ballroom was all ears.
The challenge for negotiators is figuring out what the White House wants, Turnbull said.
It is not just about the levies themselves, it is the constant flux. Tariffs are on, then paused. They are ratcheted up, then dialed down. Even the rationale has shifted: In Trump’s first term, when Turnbull was Australia’s prime minister, the fixation was with trade deficits. Now, it is reindustrialization and generating revenue to offset tax cuts.
However, while all that might be true, it is missing a broader point. What if tariffs are as much about looking tough as achieving meaningful results? If that is the case, then there is little that the US’ partners can do to satisfy the US president’s demands — assuming they are even intended to be met, and that they would not change. The 90-day pause on so-called reciprocal tariffs ends in two weeks. We will find out.
Looking for logic might be missing the whole idea, according to a new e-book by Richard Baldwin, a professor at the International Institute for Management Development in Lausanne, Switzerland.
The duties reflect what the author describes as a “Grievance Doctrine.” Distilled into a word, trade policy is now about emotion.
Protectionism is aimed at satisfying the political demands of Trump’s supporters. Never mind the stated objective of making more stuff in the US. The key is understanding the performative role the barriers can play. They were not the means to an end, but the end.
“The act itself was visible, aggressive, and emotionally satisfying to a political base convinced that America had been cheated and humiliated,” he wrote in The Great Trade Hack: How Trump’s Trade War Fails and the World Moves On.
The actions were “emotionally coherent, but economically incoherent. And it’s why they will not achieve their stated goals,” he wrote.
Truly bolstering the middle class would require politically difficult investment in healthcare, education and affordable housing, Baldwin said.
Trump insists he is trying to help now work in service industries, not manufacturing. The tariffs would fail to diminish their sense of crisis and fuel demands for still more steps. “Tariffs are here to stay,” he wrote. “Not because they work but because they perform.”
So, does the rest of the world have an agency, or is it just dependent on US domestic drama? Hope sometimes springs from unlikely places. Turnbull went out of his way to praise former Japanese prime minister Shinzo Abe for his role in putting together a free-trade pact in 2018 that resembled the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). Minus the US, that is. Trump withdrew from the TPP in one of his first acts in office in 2017.
Abe’s splash stemmed in large part from setting aside Tokyo’s historic protectionism. The potency lay in showing that Asia could lead without the US. It is not inconceivable the White House could climb aboard such a deal if they are depicted as winners — and isolate China. There could be some emotional satisfaction for the base.
Theater aside, the trade war is causing real pain. Singapore’s faith in trade as an engine of prosperity is undiminished, but it is warning of a downturn. Like-minded nations need to figure out Washington’s game and work around if needed.
There is scope for the EU to bolster ties with Japan, South Korea and the ASEAN. The EU aims to revive negotiations with Australia while also seeking a wide-ranging deal with India by the end of the year.
It would be ironic if the nations Washington used to lecture about free trade became bastions of a system the US has tired of.
Daniel Moss is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asian economies. Previously, he was executive editor for economics at Bloomberg News. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
In a meeting with Haitian Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean-Victor Harvel Jean-Baptiste on Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) vowed to continue providing aid to Haiti. Taiwan supports Haiti with development in areas such as agriculture, healthcare and education through initiatives run by the Taiwan International Cooperation and Development Fund (ICDF). The nation it has established itself as a responsible, peaceful and innovative actor committed to global cooperation, Jean-Baptiste said. Testimonies such as this give Taiwan a voice in the global community, where it often goes unheard. Taiwan’s reception in Haiti also contrasts with how China has been perceived in countries in the region
The world has become less predictable, less rules-based, and more shaped by the impulses of strongmen and short-term dealmaking. Nowhere is this more consequential than in East Asia, where the fate of democratic Taiwan hinges on how global powers manage — or mismanage — tensions with an increasingly assertive China. The return of Donald Trump to the White House has deepened the global uncertainty, with his erratic, highly personalized foreign-policy approach unsettling allies and adversaries alike. Trump appears to treat foreign policy like a reality show. Yet, paradoxically, the global unpredictability may offer Taiwan unexpected deterrence. For China, the risk of provoking the
On April 13, I stood in Nanan (南安), a Bunun village in southern Hualien County’s Jhuosi Township (卓溪), absorbing lessons from elders who spoke of the forest not as backdrop, but as living presence — relational, sacred and full of spirit. I was there with fellow international students from National Dong Hwa University (NDHU) participating in a field trip that would become one of the most powerful educational experiences of my life. Ten days later, a news report in the Taipei Times shattered the spell: “Formosan black bear shot and euthanized in Hualien” (April 23, page 2). A tagged bear, previously released
Young supporters of former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) were detained for posting the names and photographs of judges and prosecutors believed to be overseeing the Core Pacific City redevelopment corruption case. The supporters should be held responsible for their actions. As for Ko’s successor, TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), he should reflect on whether his own comments are provocative and whether his statements might be misunderstood. Huang needs to apologize to the public and the judiciary. In the article, “Why does sorry seem to be the hardest word?” the late political commentator Nan Fang Shuo (南方朔) wrote
RSS