Vietnam rightly worries about the harm US tariffs would inflict on its success, and even more bullish aspirations. The levies would slow an economy that has racked up impressive rates of growth. The past few months have also revealed a challenge of a different nature: a declining birthrate.
This is a country, often hailed as a development model, that has a lot on its plate. It should avoid going overboard on sweating demographics. That is not an existential issue — yet. In some ways, the trend toward fewer births could even be called a victory. Trade, linked so intimately with the decades-old industrialization plan, is the more vital front. The setting of priorities is important, but they can travel on two tracks.
The government last week scrapped a long-standing rule that limited households to no more than two kids. Couples would now be allowed to welcome as many babies as they wish. At first glance, the shift looks dramatic and recalls China’s panicked jettisoning of its iconic one-child policy a decade ago. All the more so because both nations have communist rulers, showed a penchant for central planning before discovering that markets can enrich and saw pint-sized families as a path to poverty elimination.
Illustration: Yusha
There is a healthy pragmatism to repealing the policy. In practice, Vietnamese authorities tended to turn a blind eye to people who exceeded the quota, with the important exception of party cadres (those who contravene risked losing their jobs). And with fertility retreating, as is the case in many parts of the world, there would have been little enforcement required. Arguably, Vietnam’s pivot brings the law into line with reality. However, the root cause of the decision does point to an underlying concern.
Having pulled off what was initially intended in 1988, when the fertility rate was more than 4.0, officials now fret having gone too far: The rate declined to a record low of 1.9 per woman last year. That put the estimate of how many children a woman would bear below the replacement level for a third consecutive year. Numbers like this tend to get attention.
That has certainly been the case with neighbors whose commercial success Hanoi has sought to emulate. Japan, South Korea and Singapore, whose numbers are significantly lower, are rolling out steps to make motherhood more attractive. Developing countries such as Malaysia, Thailand and Indonesia are witnessing the same trend with a lesser degree of consternation — and fewer resources to throw at the issue. The Philippines actually welcomes the advent of smaller households.
While future labor shortages and the fiscal strains that come with a smaller workforce supporting more retirees are worth planning for, any anxiety needs to be kept in perspective. Television dating shows and propaganda posters urging couples to get busy are fine and unlikely to cause harm. However, officials should also be clear-eyed that the benefits would be modest. Singapore also tried to play matchmaker. That initiative has been wound down.
The hefty tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump are a far greater worry and show the vulnerability inherent in another part of Vietnam’s development strategy. Like China in the era of former Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), the nation sought a way to wealth through wooing foreign manufacturers. Factories initially focused on churning out cheap goods for American consumers. More recently, technology firms came to see Vietnam as a cornerstone of a “China Plus One” approach: shifting production to a place that is close to the supply chains still reliant on China, but not actually in China. The idea was to avoid falling foul of Washington as it sought to constrain Beijing. Then came the tariffs, set at a steep 46 percent.
In some ways, if the tariffs — suspended for 90 days — were to hit, this was probably the least inopportune time. The economy expanded almost 7 percent last quarter, a bit slower than the blistering clip of last year. The government is sticking to its goal of double-digit growth in the coming years. This sort of ambition assumes that the trade wars are either temporary or not so severe that it forces a radical rethink.
Scope for deals? Sure. Vietnam has dispatched top negotiators to the US, pledged to dismantle barriers and even put a Trump-branded golf resort on the fast track. Can Hanoi’s model, conceived when Washington was attached to free trade, survive in a less benign era? In the event Trump’s efforts to upend the economic order succeed, Vietnam would need to do more than just navigate between the two giants. It would have to interest investors on its own terms, not as the China alternative or a “China-lite.”
This is a more existential question than shoring up the birthrate. Plan for a future of smaller families by all means, but do not wring your hands over fertility. Take the win. Panic would not get you very far with tariffs, either, even if anxiety certainly seems warranted.
Daniel Moss is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Asian economies. Previously, he was executive editor for economics at Bloomberg News.
The US Senate’s passage of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which urges Taiwan’s inclusion in the Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise and allocates US$1 billion in military aid, marks yet another milestone in Washington’s growing support for Taipei. On paper, it reflects the steadiness of US commitment, but beneath this show of solidarity lies contradiction. While the US Congress builds a stable, bipartisan architecture of deterrence, US President Donald Trump repeatedly undercuts it through erratic decisions and transactional diplomacy. This dissonance not only weakens the US’ credibility abroad — it also fractures public trust within Taiwan. For decades,
In 1976, the Gang of Four was ousted. The Gang of Four was a leftist political group comprising Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members: Jiang Qing (江青), its leading figure and Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) last wife; Zhang Chunqiao (張春橋); Yao Wenyuan (姚文元); and Wang Hongwen (王洪文). The four wielded supreme power during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), but when Mao died, they were overthrown and charged with crimes against China in what was in essence a political coup of the right against the left. The same type of thing might be happening again as the CCP has expelled nine top generals. Rather than a
The ceasefire in the Middle East is a rare cause for celebration in that war-torn region. Hamas has released all of the living hostages it captured on Oct. 7, 2023, regular combat operations have ceased, and Israel has drawn closer to its Arab neighbors. Israel, with crucial support from the United States, has achieved all of this despite concerted efforts from the forces of darkness to prevent it. Hamas, of course, is a longtime client of Iran, which in turn is a client of China. Two years ago, when Hamas invaded Israel — killing 1,200, kidnapping 251, and brutalizing countless others
A Reuters report published this week highlighted the struggles of migrant mothers in Taiwan through the story of Marian Duhapa, a Filipina forced to leave her infant behind to work in Taiwan and support her family. After becoming pregnant in Taiwan last year, Duhapa lost her job and lived in a shelter before giving birth and taking her daughter back to the Philippines. She then returned to Taiwan for a second time on her own to find work. Duhapa’s sacrifice is one of countless examples among the hundreds of thousands of migrant workers who sustain many of Taiwan’s households and factories,
RSS