The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has released a plan to economically integrate China’s Fujian Province with Taiwan’s Kinmen County, outlining a cross-strait development project based on six major themes and 21 measures.
This official document by the CCP is directed toward Taiwan’s three outlying island counties: Penghu County, Lienchiang County (Matsu) and Kinmen County. The plan sets out to construct a cohabiting sphere between Kinmen and the nearby Chinese city of Xiamen, as well as between Matsu and Fuzhou. It also aims to bring together Minnanese cultural areas including Taiwan’s Penghu and China’s cities of Quanzhou and Zhangzhou for further integrated development. These three steps show the CCP’s agenda in making Taiwan’s outlying islands in the Taiwan Strait more dependent on China. In doing so, Taiwan’s national defense would be weakened day by day. This is a war strategy designed to subdue one’s enemy without fighting.
Beijing has said that China has made “concessions” in this plan for the sake of Taiwanese. The Chinese government said that Kinmen and Matsu residents would receive the same treatment as residents of Xiamen and Fuzhou. For instance, the plan explained that it would advance the gas, electricity and transportation links between Kinmen and Xiamen, and Kinmen residents would have shared access to Xiamen’s new airport.
Similarly, between Matsu and Fuzhou, water, gas, electricity and transportation links would be established and promoted. The plan said that Taiwanese citizens living in Fujian Province would no longer need to submit temporary residence registration, and would be encouraged to purchase property there. The plan also talked about the “Hakka ancestral land” to bring Taiwanese Hakka and Chinese Hakka together.
Clearly, this plan is attempting to achieve integration through logistics, commerce, education, employment, folk customs, justice, technology, culture and entertainment, to ensure the CCP realizes its goal of so-called “peaceful unification.”
The “concessions” made by Beijing would reinforce China’s grip on Taiwanese living on Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu. Beijing aims to bolster these counties’ dependence on China and have them subjugated, so that they no longer reject and fear China. The purpose is to infiltrate Penghu, Kinmen, and Matsu, and gradually get hold of these three counties’ important resources relevant to people’s livelihoods. If Beijing’s “concessions” and enticements failed to work, Taiwanese residents of these three counties would still be threatened and extorted by the CCP, both physically and psychologically. This is precisely what Russia did to Crimea in 2014.
The CCP released this plan at this moment for a particular reason. Obviously, Beijing aims to turn Taiwan’s front line (which includes Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu) into China’s de facto territory. Through the Taiwanese residents’ minds and lives, China would annex the three counties, and it would be Taiwan’s turn next. Eventually, the nation would become “a part of China.” The plan directed at Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu could be a forerunner of CCP Politburo Standing Committee member Wang Huning’s (王滬寧) new “one country, two systems” project. This should be considered a skirmish before China officially launches its propaganda war against Taiwan.
Taipei should do everything for Penghu, Kinmen, and Matsu residents to build up their immunity against China before it is too late.
Sheng I-che is the host of “Face China.”
Translated by Emma Liu
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS