As next year’s presidential election gets closer, there are increasing concerns in Taiwan regarding the issue of election interference by China.
Short-video sharing apps on mobile devices have become all the rage recently, and one of the most popular of these is Douyin and its international version TikTok, owned by Beijing-based ByteDance Ltd.
TikTok has 4 million users in Taiwan alone, and people in the 18 to 24 age range account for 40 percent. These users regard TikTok as a source of news, information and entertainment, with other Chinese apps like Xiaohongshu becoming main amusement sources in people’s daily lives.
From a user’s perspective, TikTok can ensure that specific content can go viral and have a major impact in Taiwan, and this is primarily down to specific tricks it has up its sleeve: a recommendation algorithm catering to users’ preferences, short videos with abundant information that suit people living in modern societies and the weight of peer pressure, with the implication that if people are not using it, they are out of the loop.
TikTok is a double-edged sword in that users’ senses are quickly satisfied with short videos. It removes the patience and concentration required to analyze complicated public affairs, fragments users’ attention and diverts their minds over the long run, adversely affecting the young generation’s mental developlment.
TikTok and Douyin even pose a threat to national security and privacy due to loopholes in data security. ByteDance’s Beijing headquarters owns a golden share in the company: That is, it has more power than other shareholders over changes in its management. In addition, the Chinese Communist Party has a presence inside the company, meaning that it can have influence over business decisions and backdoor access to the data of users throughout the world, and it allows Beijing to have a say in TikTok’s recommendation algorithm, deciding what each user sees.
Recently, Beijing fabricated the meeting minutes of the South China Sea Conference, with the rumor that Taipei has agreed to develop biological weapons for the US, and streamed this disinformation on TikTok.
If Beijing is capable of doing this, who can ensure that it would not use TikTok as a tool, waging a larger scale of public opinion warfare against Taiwan?
When the government tried to address the problem of cognitive warfare in recent years it insisted on a policy of platform neutrality, so that it does not check on the vectors of cognitive warfare, concentrating solely on the content.
Furthermore, the controversy over the draft digital intermediary service act has meant that the government has had to shelve it, missing the opportunity of regulating Chinese apps such as TikTok.
If the government starts to control Chinese apps for the coming election, even with legitimately and with goodwill, it would be criticized by Beijing and its allies in Taiwan, opening it up to manipulation by opposition parties saying that the Democratic Progressive Party is “the enemy of the younger generation.”
Regulating TikTok and other Chinese social media apps would test the government’s wisdom on rapidly raising public awareness of the risk of Chinese apps and lowering its effect on Taiwanese.
Roger Wu works in the service industry and is a part-time freelance writer.
Translated by Polly Chiu
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) said on Monday that it would be announcing its mayoral nominees for New Taipei City, Yilan County and Chiayi City on March 11, after which it would begin talks with the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) to field joint opposition candidates. The KMT would likely support Deputy Taipei Mayor Lee Shu-chuan (李四川) as its candidate for New Taipei City. The TPP is fielding its chairman, Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), for New Taipei City mayor, after Huang had officially announced his candidacy in December last year. Speaking in a radio program, Huang was asked whether he would join Lee’s
RSS