The Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) nomination last month of New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) as its presidential candidate does not seem to have galvanized the party as a whole.
Hon Hai Precision Industry Co founder Terry Gou (郭台銘) is not yet convinced he is out of the game. As Hou has always kept the KMT’s deep-blue faction at arm’s length — a group consisting of generations of waishengren (外省人), or those who fled China with the KMT after 1949 and were given important positions, privilege and power by the regime — he has so far received tepid support from party members.
Given the mistrust and antagonism between benshengren (本省人) — people who came to Taiwan in the centuries preceding World War II — and waishengren in the party, Hou needs the endorsement of two KMT heavyweights: former Kaohsiung mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) and former legislative speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平).
KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) once said that Hou, having started out as a police officer, would “do his job right.” While the remark might sound like a compliment, this has proved to be Hou’s Achilles heel within the KMT’s party culture. Civil servants working under the KMT’s autocratic rule were trained to carry out orders from the top and evade responsibility.
Hou is a classic example of this. He lobbed a groundless accusation that the Democratic Progressive Party called military personnel, public servants and public-school teachers “parasites.” Before attacking others, the KMT should have put its house in order first. It seems to have forgotten how its former directorate-general of personnel administration Chen Kang-chin (陳庚金) and Han once publicly encouraged civil servants to be “salary thieves.”
US expert on China affairs Bonnie Glaser has said that as Beijing does not know much about Hou, except that he bears some similarities to the late president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), it is “uneasy” about him winning the presidency. However, as all three main presidential candidates are benshengren, this has been an irksome fact for China and the KMT.
In terms of leadership, vision and experience, Hou cannot hold a candle to Lee, and he is under the thumb of the KMT’s higher echelons. KMT representatives sent to visit China have always been the pro-China waishengren faction in charge of cross-strait affairs. The idea of having a benshengren in the Presidential Office does not sit well with the deep-blue faction.
Gou’s supporters and anti-Hou factions have something in common: the waishengren-benshengren complex. Finding a replacement is out of the question, with memories of the humiliating defeat following the replacement of former KMT chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) in the 2016 presidential election still fresh in the mind.
The only way to save Hou’s failing campaign is to “unite” the party’s waishengren and benshengren. As one of the most influential waishengren factions in the party, Han and his loyal “Han wave” supporters have always seen themselves as the “booster” that can give any candidate a leg up in the campaign. Unfortunately, as Hou and Han have had a few rifts in the past, Han and his supporters are still waiting for Hou to extend the olive branch.
On Hou’s part, he is bent on garnering support from the deep-blue faction, vowing to undo the DPP’s cutting of pensions for retired military personnel, public servants and public-school teachers. Wang is the leading figure of the benshengren faction in the KMT. However, the politically savvy former legislative speaker has declined to be Hou’s campaign director and only agreed to provide assistance from the sidelines. As Hou’s hallmark of “blue skin and green bones” is now working against him, Hou needs the waishengren faction to help his campaign. However, as the higher echelons in the KMT have shown, waishengren are used to being the king themselves, not kingmakers.
With one leader awaiting Hou’s sign of goodwill and the other turning down Hou’s offer, pundits are having a field day with Hou’s falling support ratings and less than satisfactory performance. From the most popular candidate that secured a landslide victory in last year’s local election to the desperate nominee begging for support, Hou is in for an uphill battle. As cunning as Chu is, he cannot escape the fate of stepping down once Hou loses the election and the KMT falls into disarray again.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Rita Wang
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS