As the COVID-19 pandemic becomes increasingly severe, there have been several instances of people who tested positive for the disease hiding information from investigators during contact tracing. To ensure that all confirmed cases and their respective contacts tell the truth during contact tracing, people should stop encouraging witch hunts and ridiculing confirmed cases.
As the number of COVID-19 cases in Taiwan has been low, most people have looked at every case as exceptional. Under such circumstances, the public has focused on the movement of confirmed cases and speculated about their private lives as they tried to figure out how they had been infected. That approach does little to help the situation, and it could even punch a hole in the nation’s epidemic prevention armor.
Take, for example, a large cluster of COVID-19 infections that started at a local hostess teahouse in Taipei’s Wanhua District (萬華). After Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中) said one confirmed case had been engaged in “person-to-person contact” with a hostess at such an establishment, the case was widely discussed by the general public.
Many people have read too much into what Chen said and even mocked the infected person. However, in practice, we constantly have interpersonal contacts with the people we work with every day: Are these contacts not also “human-to-human contacts”?
While many links might have been drawn between the “teahouse culture” in Wanhua and sexual services, society has overlooked that such teahouses can also be venues for finding companionship, where patrons can drink tea with their friends or sing karaoke.
Just like many small eateries, teahouses offer people at the bottom of society a certain emotional outlet and support. Even if sexual contact is involved, that should not be much of a concern to the general public.
Reviewing the private lives of COVID-19 patients does more harm than good. Particularly in the face of the public’s groundless projections and overinterpretations of official’s comments, it is quite easy to imagine how ill at ease this would make those involved in teahouses feel in a society such as Taiwan, where sex still carries a stigma.
If society at large becomes used to such a witch-hunt culture, people would think that it has nothing to do with them personally, so do nothing to try to curb it, and they might even join the hunt, laughing at those being targeted. If they themselves become the center of a disease source investigation someday, how many of them would be brave enough to tell the truth when the outside world puts them under a magnifying glass? This would only make disease prevention efforts even more difficult.
Now is the critical moment that would decide if the pandemic would slow over the next few weeks. As responsible citizens, all we can do is strictly comply with the government’s disease prevention measures, stop forwarding or sending messages from an unclear source, and stop initiating witch hunts by discussing the private lives of people who have tested positive.
If we all manage to do that, we should have a real chance of fixing the broken safety net, and rebuilding our homeland into a strong democratic fortress.
Lin Shu-heng is a journalist.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS