As the COVID-19 pandemic becomes increasingly severe, there have been several instances of people who tested positive for the disease hiding information from investigators during contact tracing. To ensure that all confirmed cases and their respective contacts tell the truth during contact tracing, people should stop encouraging witch hunts and ridiculing confirmed cases.
As the number of COVID-19 cases in Taiwan has been low, most people have looked at every case as exceptional. Under such circumstances, the public has focused on the movement of confirmed cases and speculated about their private lives as they tried to figure out how they had been infected. That approach does little to help the situation, and it could even punch a hole in the nation’s epidemic prevention armor.
Take, for example, a large cluster of COVID-19 infections that started at a local hostess teahouse in Taipei’s Wanhua District (萬華). After Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中) said one confirmed case had been engaged in “person-to-person contact” with a hostess at such an establishment, the case was widely discussed by the general public.
Many people have read too much into what Chen said and even mocked the infected person. However, in practice, we constantly have interpersonal contacts with the people we work with every day: Are these contacts not also “human-to-human contacts”?
While many links might have been drawn between the “teahouse culture” in Wanhua and sexual services, society has overlooked that such teahouses can also be venues for finding companionship, where patrons can drink tea with their friends or sing karaoke.
Just like many small eateries, teahouses offer people at the bottom of society a certain emotional outlet and support. Even if sexual contact is involved, that should not be much of a concern to the general public.
Reviewing the private lives of COVID-19 patients does more harm than good. Particularly in the face of the public’s groundless projections and overinterpretations of official’s comments, it is quite easy to imagine how ill at ease this would make those involved in teahouses feel in a society such as Taiwan, where sex still carries a stigma.
If society at large becomes used to such a witch-hunt culture, people would think that it has nothing to do with them personally, so do nothing to try to curb it, and they might even join the hunt, laughing at those being targeted. If they themselves become the center of a disease source investigation someday, how many of them would be brave enough to tell the truth when the outside world puts them under a magnifying glass? This would only make disease prevention efforts even more difficult.
Now is the critical moment that would decide if the pandemic would slow over the next few weeks. As responsible citizens, all we can do is strictly comply with the government’s disease prevention measures, stop forwarding or sending messages from an unclear source, and stop initiating witch hunts by discussing the private lives of people who have tested positive.
If we all manage to do that, we should have a real chance of fixing the broken safety net, and rebuilding our homeland into a strong democratic fortress.
Lin Shu-heng is a journalist.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS