If it were not for Taiwan’s transfer of political power, I am sure few would remember that this year is the 50th anniversary of the 1958 Taiwan Strait Crisis and that the president would not have chosen to go to Kinmen to give a commemorative speech. On Aug. 23, 1958, Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東) ordered People’s Liberation Army (PLA) forces to launch an intense artillery bombardment of Kinmen, later referred to as the 823 Artillery Bombardment.
For 44 days, the PLA fired more than 470,000 shells at Kinmen, about 3,000 for each square kilometer of the island, but the troops there still managed to hold their ground.
Why did Mao want to bombard Kinmen? The CCP claims it was only trying to assess US support for Taiwan and that it conceded Kinmen on purpose to force a continuing relationship between Taiwan and China.
The CCP is good at fabricating history and this sounds like an excuse for Mao’s conduct.
I think a more feasible version is mentioned in Chang Jung’s (張戎) book Mao: The Unknown Story, in which she claims Mao wanted to use the tension caused by the bombardment to blackmail the Soviet Union into providing atom bomb technology.
We must ask if Mao really wanted to take Kinmen. By firing so many shells, he obviously wanted to annihilate the forces there. If all the defenders had been killed, could he not have wanted to take the island?
On the first day of the bombardment, after more than 50,000 shells were launched, communist troops dropped leaflets over Kinmen saying that: “More than 36,000 enemy soldiers have already been killed.”
This was wishful thinking on behalf of the CCP, based on estimates of the area and its population. Miraculously not even 600 people on the island died, because defense commander Hu Lien (胡璉) had predicted a war and mobilized troops to dig tunnels beneath Kinmen’s granite mountains and moved his military facilities there. These defensive measures, unknown to the communists, avoided annihilation and the forces were able to launch a counterattack.
The US provided a lot of assistance to Taiwan, though mainly in the form of firearms. Given these circumstances, the garrisoning of Kinmen by Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who left Kinmen on the eve of the bombardment, and the efforts of his son Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), the leadership of Yu Tai-wei (�?�) and Hu and the troops at Liaoluo Bay (料羅灣) turned the situation around.
If Kinmen had been lost, it is hard to say what would have happened to Taiwan. It is easy to imagine the fear the loss of 100,000 soldiers in Kinmen would have caused in the Taiwanese.
Just a month before the bombardment, the first people’s commune was set up in Henan Province and the Great Leap Forward started to sweep across China. In the three years after, at least 30 million people died in a disaster surpassing even the Cultural Revolution. Because Kinmen was held, Taiwan escaped the catastrophe of being “liberated” by the PLA.
For the sake of cross-strait conciliation, it is only to be expected that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) would offer China an olive branch during his commemorative speech. However, apart from looking to the future, he should remind Taiwan of this part of history and the serious threat it posed to our security.
Ma should also pay respect to those soldiers who sacrificed their lives when defending Kinmen — even if this upsets Beijing.
Huang Jui-ming is a professor of law at Providence University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
A report by the US-based Jamestown Foundation on Tuesday last week warned that China is operating illegal oil drilling inside Taiwan’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ) off the Taiwan-controlled Pratas Island (Dongsha, 東沙群島), marking a sharp escalation in Beijing’s “gray zone” tactics. The report said that, starting in July, state-owned China National Offshore Oil Corp installed 12 permanent or semi-permanent oil rig structures and dozens of associated ships deep inside Taiwan’s EEZ about 48km from the restricted waters of Pratas Island in the northeast of the South China Sea, islands that are home to a Taiwanese garrison. The rigs not only typify