If it were not for Taiwan’s transfer of political power, I am sure few would remember that this year is the 50th anniversary of the 1958 Taiwan Strait Crisis and that the president would not have chosen to go to Kinmen to give a commemorative speech. On Aug. 23, 1958, Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Mao Zedong (毛澤東) ordered People’s Liberation Army (PLA) forces to launch an intense artillery bombardment of Kinmen, later referred to as the 823 Artillery Bombardment.
For 44 days, the PLA fired more than 470,000 shells at Kinmen, about 3,000 for each square kilometer of the island, but the troops there still managed to hold their ground.
Why did Mao want to bombard Kinmen? The CCP claims it was only trying to assess US support for Taiwan and that it conceded Kinmen on purpose to force a continuing relationship between Taiwan and China.
The CCP is good at fabricating history and this sounds like an excuse for Mao’s conduct.
I think a more feasible version is mentioned in Chang Jung’s (張戎) book Mao: The Unknown Story, in which she claims Mao wanted to use the tension caused by the bombardment to blackmail the Soviet Union into providing atom bomb technology.
We must ask if Mao really wanted to take Kinmen. By firing so many shells, he obviously wanted to annihilate the forces there. If all the defenders had been killed, could he not have wanted to take the island?
On the first day of the bombardment, after more than 50,000 shells were launched, communist troops dropped leaflets over Kinmen saying that: “More than 36,000 enemy soldiers have already been killed.”
This was wishful thinking on behalf of the CCP, based on estimates of the area and its population. Miraculously not even 600 people on the island died, because defense commander Hu Lien (胡璉) had predicted a war and mobilized troops to dig tunnels beneath Kinmen’s granite mountains and moved his military facilities there. These defensive measures, unknown to the communists, avoided annihilation and the forces were able to launch a counterattack.
The US provided a lot of assistance to Taiwan, though mainly in the form of firearms. Given these circumstances, the garrisoning of Kinmen by Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石), who left Kinmen on the eve of the bombardment, and the efforts of his son Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), the leadership of Yu Tai-wei (�?�) and Hu and the troops at Liaoluo Bay (料羅灣) turned the situation around.
If Kinmen had been lost, it is hard to say what would have happened to Taiwan. It is easy to imagine the fear the loss of 100,000 soldiers in Kinmen would have caused in the Taiwanese.
Just a month before the bombardment, the first people’s commune was set up in Henan Province and the Great Leap Forward started to sweep across China. In the three years after, at least 30 million people died in a disaster surpassing even the Cultural Revolution. Because Kinmen was held, Taiwan escaped the catastrophe of being “liberated” by the PLA.
For the sake of cross-strait conciliation, it is only to be expected that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) would offer China an olive branch during his commemorative speech. However, apart from looking to the future, he should remind Taiwan of this part of history and the serious threat it posed to our security.
Ma should also pay respect to those soldiers who sacrificed their lives when defending Kinmen — even if this upsets Beijing.
Huang Jui-ming is a professor of law at Providence University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Many foreigners, particularly Germans, are struck by the efficiency of Taiwan’s administration in routine matters. Driver’s licenses, household registrations and similar procedures are handled swiftly, often decided on the spot, and occasionally even accompanied by preferential treatment. However, this efficiency does not extend to all areas of government. Any foreigner with long-term residency in Taiwan — just like any Taiwanese — would have encountered the opposite: agencies, most notably the police, refusing to accept complaints and sending applicants away at the counter without consideration. This kind of behavior, although less common in other agencies, still occurs far too often. Two cases
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Most countries are commemorating the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II with condemnations of militarism and imperialism, and commemoration of the global catastrophe wrought by the war. On the other hand, China is to hold a military parade. According to China’s state-run Xinhua news agency, Beijing is conducting the military parade in Tiananmen Square on Sept. 3 to “mark the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II and the victory of the Chinese People’s War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression.” However, during World War II, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) had not yet been established. It
RSS