When will the US wage war on Iraq? How will the US handle the nuclear crisis in North Korea? How will the US attempt to seek China's cooperation affect US-Taiwan relations? After attending the National Prayer Breakfast in Washington, Taiwan's delegation and I discussed these questions and related issues with US officials, members of Congress and think-tank experts.
After the Sept. 11 attacks, observers have noticed the improvements in Sino-US relations. For example, US President George W. Bush have held three summit meetings with Chinese President Jiang Zemin (江澤民).
However, the improvements do not indicate that the Sino-US cooperation is without interruption. Nor have the two countries gradually become "strategic partners." Although China verbally supports the US in the war against terrorism, some US officials have privately complained that Beijing only makes empty promises. They said that the application of China's intelligence information on terrorists is limited and that China's help is not comparable to that of Taiwan.
The US has advocated a second UN resolution to authorize military action and disarm Iraq's WMD. China, France and Russia have altogether expressed an opposing view, however. They stand for the extension of weapons inspections. Bush even called and solicited the support of Jiang for a second UN resolution that authorizes military action against Iraq. To date, Beijing still has not showed signs of support for the US proposal.
On the issue of nuclear weapons in North Korea, China initially expressed its will to arrange bilateral talks between the US and North Korea. Other than that, China has not used its influence to exhort North Korea not to continue with the development of nuclear weapons. As a result, Bush called and reminded Jiang of the two countries' common responsibility to keep a nuclear-free Korean Peninsula. Bush also asked China to actively advise North Korea.
China, however, keeps shadow boxing around. It has only asked the US to continue seeking bilateral talks using diplomatic means. It is clear that the US and China have different interests and strategies on the issue of how to stop North Korea from developing nuclear weapons. The US insists on the principle of non-proliferation. The US argues that North Korea must stop developing nuclear weapons, remove the Pu-239 (a nuclear raw material) facilities at Yongbyon, and accept investigations by international inspectors. The US said the use of military force to achieve these objectives will not be ruled out.
China's interests are drastically different from those of the US. It sees North Korea as a buffer state and neither wants the North Korean regime to collapse nor supports the unification of North and South Koreas. In recent years China has supported the tottering North Korean regime, providing food provisions, oil, strategic supplies and economic aid. It believes the stability of the Korean Peninsula prevails over everything else. Although China is not happy with North Korea's development of nuclear weapons, it is not willing to resort to high-handed measures so as to force North Korea to give in. Washington officials and members of
Congress privately expressed that they are impatient with and disappointed in China's inability or unwillingness to help with the North Korean problem. They believe it is impossible for the US and China to become real strategic partners due to the difference of interests. Some Americans, Japanese and South Koreans used to assume that Beijing has influence on North Korea, but Beijing's actions really make their assumption questionable.
Parris Chang is a DPP legislator.
Translated by Grace Shaw
With escalating US-China competition and mutual distrust, the trend of supply chain “friend shoring” in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic and the fragmentation of the world into rival geopolitical blocs, many analysts and policymakers worry the world is retreating into a new cold war — a world of trade bifurcation, protectionism and deglobalization. The world is in a new cold war, said Robin Niblett, former director of the London-based think tank Chatham House. Niblett said he sees the US and China slowly reaching a modus vivendi, but it might take time. The two great powers appear to be “reversing carefully
Taiwan is facing multiple economic challenges due to internal and external pressures. Internal challenges include energy transition, upgrading industries, a declining birthrate and an aging population. External challenges are technology competition between the US and China, international supply chain restructuring and global economic uncertainty. All of these issues complicate Taiwan’s economic situation. Taiwan’s reliance on fossil fuel imports not only threatens the stability of energy supply, but also goes against the global trend of carbon reduction. The government should continue to promote renewable energy sources such as wind and solar power, as well as energy storage technology, to diversify energy supply. It
Former Japanese minister of defense Shigeru Ishiba has been elected as president of the governing Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and would be approved as prime minister in parliament today. Ishiba is a familiar face for Taiwanese, as he has visited the nation several times. His popularity among Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) lawmakers has grown as a result of his multiple meetings and encounters with legislators and prominent figures in the government. The DPP and the LDP have close ties and have long maintained warm relations. Ishiba in August 2020 praised Taiwan’s
On Thursday last week, the International Crisis Group (ICG) issued a well-researched report titled “The Widening Schism across the Taiwan Strait,” which focused on rising tensions between Taiwan and China, making a number of recommendations on how to avoid conflict. While it is of course laudable that a respected international organization such as the ICG is willing to think through possible avenues toward a peaceful resolution, the report contains a couple of fundamental flaws in the way it approaches the issue. First, it attempts to present a “balanced approach” by pushing back equally against Taiwan’s perceived transgressions as against Beijing’s military threats
RSS