When will the US wage war on Iraq? How will the US handle the nuclear crisis in North Korea? How will the US attempt to seek China's cooperation affect US-Taiwan relations? After attending the National Prayer Breakfast in Washington, Taiwan's delegation and I discussed these questions and related issues with US officials, members of Congress and think-tank experts.
After the Sept. 11 attacks, observers have noticed the improvements in Sino-US relations. For example, US President George W. Bush have held three summit meetings with Chinese President Jiang Zemin (江澤民).
However, the improvements do not indicate that the Sino-US cooperation is without interruption. Nor have the two countries gradually become "strategic partners." Although China verbally supports the US in the war against terrorism, some US officials have privately complained that Beijing only makes empty promises. They said that the application of China's intelligence information on terrorists is limited and that China's help is not comparable to that of Taiwan.
The US has advocated a second UN resolution to authorize military action and disarm Iraq's WMD. China, France and Russia have altogether expressed an opposing view, however. They stand for the extension of weapons inspections. Bush even called and solicited the support of Jiang for a second UN resolution that authorizes military action against Iraq. To date, Beijing still has not showed signs of support for the US proposal.
On the issue of nuclear weapons in North Korea, China initially expressed its will to arrange bilateral talks between the US and North Korea. Other than that, China has not used its influence to exhort North Korea not to continue with the development of nuclear weapons. As a result, Bush called and reminded Jiang of the two countries' common responsibility to keep a nuclear-free Korean Peninsula. Bush also asked China to actively advise North Korea.
China, however, keeps shadow boxing around. It has only asked the US to continue seeking bilateral talks using diplomatic means. It is clear that the US and China have different interests and strategies on the issue of how to stop North Korea from developing nuclear weapons. The US insists on the principle of non-proliferation. The US argues that North Korea must stop developing nuclear weapons, remove the Pu-239 (a nuclear raw material) facilities at Yongbyon, and accept investigations by international inspectors. The US said the use of military force to achieve these objectives will not be ruled out.
China's interests are drastically different from those of the US. It sees North Korea as a buffer state and neither wants the North Korean regime to collapse nor supports the unification of North and South Koreas. In recent years China has supported the tottering North Korean regime, providing food provisions, oil, strategic supplies and economic aid. It believes the stability of the Korean Peninsula prevails over everything else. Although China is not happy with North Korea's development of nuclear weapons, it is not willing to resort to high-handed measures so as to force North Korea to give in. Washington officials and members of
Congress privately expressed that they are impatient with and disappointed in China's inability or unwillingness to help with the North Korean problem. They believe it is impossible for the US and China to become real strategic partners due to the difference of interests. Some Americans, Japanese and South Koreans used to assume that Beijing has influence on North Korea, but Beijing's actions really make their assumption questionable.
Parris Chang is a DPP legislator.
Translated by Grace Shaw
Is a new foreign partner for Taiwan emerging in the Middle East? Last week, Taiwanese media reported that Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) secretly visited Israel, a country with whom Taiwan has long shared unofficial relations but which has approached those relations cautiously. In the wake of China’s implicit but clear support for Hamas and Iran in the wake of the October 2023 assault on Israel, Jerusalem’s calculus may be changing. Both small countries facing literal existential threats, Israel and Taiwan have much to gain from closer ties. In his recent op-ed for the Washington Post, President William
Taiwan-India relations appear to have been put on the back burner this year, including on Taiwan’s side. Geopolitical pressures have compelled both countries to recalibrate their priorities, even as their core security challenges remain unchanged. However, what is striking is the visible decline in the attention India once received from Taiwan. The absence of the annual Diwali celebrations for the Indian community and the lack of a commemoration marking the 30-year anniversary of the representative offices, the India Taipei Association and the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center, speak volumes and raise serious questions about whether Taiwan still has a coherent India
A stabbing attack inside and near two busy Taipei MRT stations on Friday evening shocked the nation and made headlines in many foreign and local news media, as such indiscriminate attacks are rare in Taiwan. Four people died, including the 27-year-old suspect, and 11 people sustained injuries. At Taipei Main Station, the suspect threw smoke grenades near two exits and fatally stabbed one person who tried to stop him. He later made his way to Eslite Spectrum Nanxi department store near Zhongshan MRT Station, where he threw more smoke grenades and fatally stabbed a person on a scooter by the roadside.
Recent media reports have again warned that traditional Chinese medicine pharmacies are disappearing and might vanish altogether within the next 15 years. Yet viewed through the broader lens of social and economic change, the rise and fall — or transformation — of industries is rarely the result of a single factor, nor is it inherently negative. Taiwan itself offers a clear parallel. Once renowned globally for manufacturing, it is now best known for its high-tech industries. Along the way, some businesses successfully transformed, while others disappeared. These shifts, painful as they might be for those directly affected, have not necessarily harmed society
RSS