The status of Taiwan has been one of contention since the end of World War II. Though Japan surrendered sovereignty over Taiwan in the San Francisco Peace Treaty (1952), it never specified to whom Taiwan should then belong. This opened the door for numerous claims and opinions, and yet ironically, in the resultant hubbub of those conflicting claims, no one has ever asked the Taiwanese for their thoughts or opinions. This book, Taiwan’s Struggle, Voices of the Taiwanese, aims to rectify that.
The 23 writers who contribute are all Taiwanese and do not hold back in their opinions. As politicians, academics and professionals, most live in Taiwan, but some remain “diaspora,” having been forced abroad during the harshness of Taiwan’s White Terror era. However, wherever they are, in writing about the topics of Taiwan’s identity, international status, international relations and economic issues, they leave no doubt that they consider Taiwan their motherland.
PROMINENT THINKERS
On the political side, readers will recognize several prominent contributors. Lee Teng-hui (李登輝), president of Taiwan from 1988 to 2000, starts things off. In “Establishing a Taiwan-Centered Identity,” he traces both his own journey of freedom from the myth of “Asian values,” and how he guided Taiwan into its present state of democracy.
Peng Ming-min (彭明敏), Lee’s opponent in Taiwan’s first direct presidential election, argues in “The International Status of the Taiwanese People” that Taiwanese remain locked in “political-legal limbo” despite the nation’s de facto independence. China’s irredentist claims to Taiwan are the main culprit.
Annette Lu (呂秀蓮), vice president from 2000 to 2008 and Wong Ming-shien (翁明賢), a senior advisor to the National Security Council, (2006 to 2008) go into greater detail about China’s many-pronged strategy to silently annex Taiwan in successive periods and under various Chinese leaders. Throughout this process, Taiwan has faced challenges in the military, cultural, political, economic and social arenas.
A different perspective is brought out in Joseph Kuo’s (郭正昭), “The ‘Black Hole’ and the ‘Mystery Force.’” The metaphoric black hole reference to China is obvious as it seeks to suck in Taiwanese businesses and absorb Taiwan. However, the “mystery force” of the US may surprise some; here Kuo presents situations where the US selectively interferes with Taiwan’s democracy if it jeopardizes the US’ pursuit of economic gain from China.
Interspersed in this work are essays on the development of Taiwan’s democracy such as George Sung’s (宋朝昇) “Democratization in Taiwan: Lifting the Blacklist,” and Strong Chuang’s (莊秋雄) touching “Memoir” on how he found courage from others to risk defying that blacklist. The blacklist of “undesirable Taiwanese who support democracy and self-rule” was finally removed in 1992.
Also present are testimonies such as Aquia Tsay’s (蔡丁貴) account of his personal epiphany when he, like many others, overcame the “brainwashing” of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government while working on his doctorate in the US. Aquia can often be found in the front lines of protest including that of assisting the Sunflower movement’s takeover of the legislature by distracting the police.
The book is a treasure trove of diverse topics. The rise of nationalism is traced as well as the shaping of culture by history; then there is the matter of the diversity of Taiwan’s DNA, the development of human rights; it all ends in how Taiwan’s history is clearly separate from that of China.
Detailed examinations of relations between Taiwan and China include China’s meddling even in the assassination attempt on Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), how the Cold War made Taiwan a “pariah and pawn” and how a democratic Taiwan would have been good for all Asia as a counter to China’s developing hegemony in the South China Sea. Little is left untouched.
TIME CAPSULE EFFECT
A final feature of this book is its time capsule effect. As the book was in the process of publication, three important happenings were developing in Taiwan. They came almost as if in response to the warnings and suggestions given in the essays.
First, the Sunflower movement in March 2014 stopped the nation’s blind headlong plunge into an unpopular trade deal and called for an item-by-item examination by the legislature. Chen Po-chih (陳博志) warns of these dangers in “ECFA and China’s Strategy to the World” as do other essays on Taiwan’s economy and China’s dangerous threat to its high-tech industries.
Further, the results of Taiwan’s November 2014 nine-in-one elections where the KMT lost the majority of major cities, and the elections in January this year, when the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) took the presidency and a majority in the legislature, reflects the books emphasis on a developing Taiwanese identity.
The idea that Taiwan is different from China, that it is capable of being a responsible member of the international community and that the Taiwanese should have hope for the future pervade the book in mixed voices that are sad, angry and hopeful. With a DPP president and the party in control of the legislature, what will the next 4 years be like? That remains to be seen, but if the voices heard in this book are any indication, the Taiwanese are quite aware of their situation and what needs to be done.
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50