Jiyi Wu (吳芷儀) is adamant that she is not a man. Or, for that matter, a woman.
“People wonder. I bought chewing gum once from a grandmother on the street and she asked me if I am a man or a woman,” said Wu, 29, who was dressed in a long blouse and had let her hair down.
“The answer is I want my body to be more feminine — that is why I had my surgery,” she said. “But my gender is fluid. I don’t think of it as female or male.”
Photo: Enru Lin, Taipei Times
Wu, who freely embraces other labels like housewife and professional cat lover, was born male, but began hormone treatment in 2007 and completed male-to-female sex reassignment surgery last July.
A few months after the surgery, Wu — who was still legally listed as a man — applied to marry longtime partner Abbygail Wu (吳伊婷), a transgender person who had already transferred her legal status from man to woman. The Household Registration Office (戶政事務所) approved the certificate for a union that was — on paper — between a man and a woman.
But to the Wus, theirs is not a marriage between a man and a woman, or a woman and a woman.
“We aren’t lesbians,” said 27-year-old Abbygail Wu, a software engineer.
Instead, she and her partner identify themselves as genderqueer — a “third gender,” said Jiyi Wu. “We are a genderqueer person married to another genderqueer person.”
ANNULMENT
Nine months in and their marriage is already on the rocks, though not for the usual reasons.
The Wanhua District Household Registration Office, under authorization by the Ministry of the Interior (MOI), has issued the couple a notice that their marriage is illegitimate. According to office records, Jiyi Wu and Abbygail Wu completed male-to-female sex reassignment surgery in July, and Abbygail Wu obtained legal status as a woman on Oct. 11. The Wus registered for marriage on Oct. 16.
“In this case, both parties concerned had completed their sexual reassignment surgery from male to female before registering their marriage,” according to a written statement by MOI official Kao Chiu-feng (高秋鳳).
“Because both were women at the time of marriage, conditions do not fulfill the Civil Code (民法) stipulation that marriage is between a man and a woman,” Kao wrote.
Biological determinism
The Wus and their supporters believe that government authorities are using a crude form of biological determinism to confer gender.
“This marriage is between a person with a man’s legal status and a person with a woman’s legal status,” said Democratic Progressive Party legislator Cheng Li-chiun (鄭麗君), who with party lawmaker Yu Mei-nu (尤美女) has submitted a complaint to the MOI on the Wus’ behalf. “Going by their IDs, it’s absolutely legitimate.”
To delegitimize the marriage, the MOI chooses to ignore their household registration and looks instead at their bodies to conclude that Jiyi Wu, because she no longer has testes or a penis, is not a man.
“The MOI is saying that only a man with the biological profile of a man can marry a biological woman,” said Cheng.
In every society there are many persons who do not fit the normal biological profile. Some women don’t menstruate, simply because they are taking a certain medication, or because they are pregnant, underweight, overweight or chronically exhausted. Some men lose their sexual organs due to cancer or other diseases.
Under the logic of biological determinism, a man who does not function biologically as society’s vision of a man would not be considered eligible for marriage to a woman, and vice versa.
QUEER MARRIAGE
Such a policy ruling is unthinkable when it comes to people who identify clearly as a man or a woman, but it’s a reality for the Wus.
There is currently no law that guarantees the marriage rights of a genderqueer person, whose union often falls into the category of same-sex marriage.
To circumvent Ministry of Justice interpretations that ban gay marriage, a genderqueer person can choose to transition to another gender category, but faces formidable hurdles.
Under MOI rules established in 2008, a person who wants a sex change must be deemed qualified by two psychiatrists and must have undergone sex reassignment surgery. For a female-to-male sex change, the person must have removed the breasts, uterus and ovaries. For a male-to-female sex change, the person must have surgically removed the penis and testes.
These requirements turn many genderqueer individuals away from getting their desired sex change. Some do not want to lose their sexual organs. Others simply can’t afford the surgeries.
In over 10 countries, such as the UK, medical surgery is not a requirement for a gender reassignment. Argentina, in an unprecedented move, has removed all requirements for a legal gender change, so that a person can change gender purely on request.
The MOI is rethinking its gender recognition policy and is midway through a survey of how other countries handle the issue, said Su Chih-meng (蘇誌盟), director of Population Policy at the MOI’s Department of Household Registration (戶政司人口政策), to the Taipei Times. Decisions will be announced in November.
Seven hundred job applications. One interview. Marco Mascaro arrived in Taiwan last year with a PhD in engineering physics and years of experience at a European research center. He thought his Gold Card would guarantee him a foothold in Taiwan’s job market. “It’s marketed as if Taiwan really needs you,” the 33-year-old Italian says. “The reality is that companies here don’t really need us.” The Employment Gold Card was designed to fix Taiwan’s labor shortage by offering foreign professionals a combined resident visa and open work permit valid for three years. But for many, like Mascaro, the welcome mat ends at the door. A
Last week gave us the droll little comedy of People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) consul general in Osaka posting a threat on X in response to Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi saying to the Diet that a Chinese attack on Taiwan may be an “existential threat” to Japan. That would allow Japanese Self Defence Forces to respond militarily. The PRC representative then said that if a “filthy neck sticks itself in uninvited, we will cut it off without a moment’s hesitation. Are you prepared for that?” This was widely, and probably deliberately, construed as a threat to behead Takaichi, though it
Nov. 17 to Nov. 23 When Kanori Ino surveyed Taipei’s Indigenous settlements in 1896, he found a culture that was fading. Although there was still a “clear line of distinction” between the Ketagalan people and the neighboring Han settlers that had been arriving over the previous 200 years, the former had largely adopted the customs and language of the latter. “Fortunately, some elders still remember their past customs and language. But if we do not hurry and record them now, future researchers will have nothing left but to weep amid the ruins of Indigenous settlements,” he wrote in the Journal of
If China attacks, will Taiwanese be willing to fight? Analysts of certain types obsess over questions like this, especially military analysts and those with an ax to grind as to whether Taiwan is worth defending, or should be cut loose to appease Beijing. Fellow columnist Michael Turton in “Notes from Central Taiwan: Willing to fight for the homeland” (Nov. 6, page 12) provides a superb analysis of this topic, how it is used and manipulated to political ends and what the underlying data shows. The problem is that most analysis is centered around polling data, which as Turton observes, “many of these
RSS