If China attacks, will Taiwanese be willing to fight?
Analysts of certain types obsess over questions like this, especially military analysts and those with an ax to grind as to whether Taiwan is worth defending, or should be cut loose to appease Beijing.
Fellow columnist Michael Turton in “Notes from Central Taiwan: Willing to fight for the homeland” (Nov. 6, page 12) provides a superb analysis of this topic, how it is used and manipulated to political ends and what the underlying data shows.
Photo: TT file photo
The problem is that most analysis is centered around polling data, which as Turton observes, “many of these polls do not follow the issue over a long period of time, since they are intended as instant propaganda for one side or the other.”
He demonstrates that in polling taken over time: “The overall trend is clear: over the last decade, Taiwanese have grown more willing to fight the PRC if it attacks Taiwan.”
However, he cautions that “polls post wildly varying numbers showing spikes in one direction or another” that are then “cherry-picked” to support whatever propaganda agenda is being peddled.
Photo: Courtney Donovan Smith
Regular readers of this normally polling-obsessed column may be surprised that I ignore these polls. The key reason is, as Turton astutely makes clear, “the constantly shifting polls on willingness to fight will actually mean very little once bombs start falling and loved ones start dying.”
The second reason is that the question, while important, misses the big picture.
A more valuable question would be “if under attack and bombs are falling, would you do your part — using your skills, talents and abilities — to best serve in the defense of your community and your nation?”
Photo: Courtney Donovan Smith
Not everyone can — or should — pick up arms to fight. Fighting is best done by those with the capacity and training to do so effectively.
To be effective, each fighter needs a small army of supporters backing them up. Logistics personnel, mechanics, medics, cooks, clerks and others are necessary for them to function.
With bombs falling, people will be needed in nearly every capacity. Some will clear rubble and rescue trapped people, while others replenish their water and food. Others will be needed to hurriedly jury rig stretchers and bandages, clear pathways and care for the wounded.
Photo: Courtney Donovan Smith
In such a scenario, there is a role for nearly everyone to play, and even minor-seeming tasks can be lifesaving. There is an elderly lady in my neighborhood with a magical ability to pile almost anything in absurd quantities onto her little scooter for recycling. She would be perfect for handling rapid logistics response around the neighborhood in an emergency.
The third reason I ignore the polling is that I already know the answer: The vast majority of Taiwanese will step up to do their part. That means everyone, including frontline fighters.
Why the certainty? Because over and over again, in crisis, I have witnessed Taiwanese in action, and they step up when needed.
Not because they were asked, but because it was the right thing to do.
LIFE IN CRISIS
For many, the recent “shovel superhero” phenomenon will come to mind, where tens of thousands of Taiwanese dropped everything, picked up shovels and disaster-relief kits and made their way to Hualien to help unbury Guangfu Township (光復) from the mud that engulfed it.
Others may recall how quickly Taiwanese adapted to the pandemic. While the rest of the world floundered, the nimble, flexible and adaptable Taiwanese showed their world-beating prowess at problem-solving and quick turnaround under pressure.
Taiwanese factories quickly retooled and adapted to pump out urgently needed facemasks and PPE, aided by apps tracking availability store-by-store to most efficiently distribute them. They did so with such speed and efficiency that they not only quickly saturated the local market, they rapidly became an essential lifeline for people around the world.
However, it is the 921 Earthquake (known internationally as the 1999 Jiji Earthquake) that most clearly demonstrated the Taiwanese spirit in response to disaster. This 7.3 magnitude earthquake struck at 1:47am in Jiji Township (集集) in Nantou County, and is the second most deadly in Taiwan’s history.
Destruction and death were widespread on mainland Taiwan, and buildings collapsed as far away as Taipei. Coincidentally, I was staying in Taipei that evening, and while my hotel’s walls cracked and buckled, another hotel in Taipei collapsed completely.
By far the majority of the 2,415 deaths and 11,305 injuries were in Nantou and today’s Wufeng (霧峰), Taiping (太平), Dali (大里), and Dongshih (東勢) districts in Taichung.
The destruction was widespread, and the terror kept coming. Aftershock after aftershock, some as strong as 6.8, could and would hit at any time.
Despite my Taichung neighborhood being on fairly solid bedrock, parks were packed with families living in tents in fear of the relentless aftershocks — some of the aftershock epicenters were right in the heart of the city. For a year afterwards, children would scream in terror whenever an earthquake struck.
For weeks, power and water were intermittent at best, and due to the dangers, gas was out of the question. Water trucks provided drinking water. Cell phone towers were down, and with smartphones not yet invented, the only Internet was via computer and modems, which were useless much of the time with the power out.
Our only reliable information was battery-powered radio, and for English speakers, ICRT Radio was the essential lifeline, especially reports by Taichung-based Douglas Habecker, who reported from the ground and via helicopter in Nantou County. Everyone felt very isolated and afraid, desperate for news.
Roads were buckled and cracked, and traffic lights were often out of commission. Aftershocks continued to take down buildings and take lives unpredictably, and when out buying supplies, it was important to keep an eye out for structural integrity.
The atmosphere was eerily calm, punctuated by moments of dread as the earth shook yet again. People seemed slightly distracted; typical day-to-day concerns faded in importance as people busied themselves with the urgent tasks at hand.
HEROS ARISE IN CRISIS
Heroic rescuers appeared to try and save people trapped in the rubble. First, they appeared locally in communities, then from around the country.
They were quickly followed by the Japanese, then from around the world, skirting Chinese airspace on what Beijing insisted was a domestic problem. It is truly awe-inspiring that these people would risk their own lives, far from home, in hopes of saving others here.
There was no chaos, no looting, no violence. People devoted themselves to dealing with the crisis at hand, helping neighbors and strangers alike to get through the difficulties.
Yes, this was different from a war; no one was intentionally killing people — and that psychologically is different than weeks of seemingly random natural destruction. Yet, reading how Ukrainians live their lives coping with periodic destruction being rained down on them, frequent outages and the knowledge that people we know may be among the dead bears more than a passing similarity.
If the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) unleashes the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) on Taiwan, they will attack with unrelenting brutality and lethality. The CCP’s respect for human life is less than zero, despite all their talk of “Taiwanese compatriots.”
Will some be too scared to help, narrowly selfish, or even traitorous? Yes, but they will be a rare few compared to those who step up to respond to the crisis.
Will the government and civil society groups have adequately prepared a coordinated response to optimally channel a civilian response? Not yet, but the seeds are there, and never underestimate the resourcefulness of the Taiwanese in a crisis.
Propagandists can spin poll numbers however they want, but it will not change the reality.
Yes, Taiwanese will fight. More importantly, they will come together.
Donovan’s Deep Dives is a regular column by Courtney Donovan Smith (石東文) who writes in-depth analysis on everything about Taiwan’s political scene and geopolitics. Donovan is also the central Taiwan correspondent at ICRT FM100 Radio News, co-publisher of Compass Magazine, co-founder Taiwan Report (report.tw) and former chair of the Taichung American Chamber of Commerce. Follow him on X: @donovan_smith.
Just after 6am, I walked up to the ticket gate at Taipei Main Station and entered the Taiwan Railway platform without scanning any ticket; instead, I flashed the Sanrio Fun Rail pass on my phone to the gate worker and was admitted. I found my train and prepared to board. My destination? This very same station. I was embarking on a 13-hour journey on one of two round-the-island trains operated by ezTravel. They run each day, one counterclockwise around the island and one clockwise. They differ in a number of ways from an ordinary Taiwan Railway train and can make for
Jason Han says that the e-arrival card spat between South Korea and Taiwan shows that Seoul is signaling adherence to its “one-China” policy, while Taiwan’s response reflects a reciprocal approach. “Attempts to alter the diplomatic status quo often lead to tit-for-tat responses,” the analyst on international affairs tells the Taipei Times, adding that Taiwan may become more cautious in its dealings with South Korea going forward. Taipei has called on Seoul to correct its electronic entry system, which currently lists Taiwan as “China (Taiwan),” warning that reciprocal measures may follow if the wording is not changed before March 31. As of yesterday,
The Portuguese never established a presence on Taiwan, but they must have traded with the indigenous people because later traders reported that the locals referred to parts of deer using Portuguese words. What goods might the Portuguese have offered their indigenous trade partners? Among them must have been slaves, for the Portuguese dealt slaves across Asia. Though we often speak of “Portuguese” ships, imagining them as picturesque vessels manned by pointy-bearded Iberians, in Asia Portuguese shipping between local destinations was crewed by Asian seamen, with a handful of white or Eurasian officers. “Even the great carracks of 1,000-2,000 tons which plied
On Thursday, former Taipei mayor and founder of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison and had his civil rights suspended for six years over corruption, embezzlement and other charges. Seven others related to the case were also handed prison sentences, while two were found not guilty. It has been a bad week for the TPP. On Tuesday, prosecutors charged Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) with suspicion of taking part in Beijing-directed election interference. Xu has strong links to the TPP, which once offered her a party list legislator nomination. Tuesday also
RSS