Jason Han says that the e-arrival card spat between South Korea and Taiwan shows that Seoul is signaling adherence to its “one-China” policy, while Taiwan’s response reflects a reciprocal approach.
“Attempts to alter the diplomatic status quo often lead to tit-for-tat responses,” the analyst on international affairs tells the << Taipei has called on Seoul to correct its electronic entry system, which currently lists Taiwan as “China (Taiwan),” warning that reciprocal measures may follow if the wording is not changed before March 31. As of yesterday, South Korea’s foreign ministry has yet to do so. The e-arrival card system fully replaced paper forms in December last year. When filling out the paper arrival cards, Taiwanese would typically fill out “Taiwan” as their home country. With the digital system, Taiwanese are now forced to choose “China (Taiwan)”. Photo: Don Huh A Taipei Times review yesterday found inconsistencies in the e-arrival card system: while the nationality field for individual travelers is listed as “Taiwan,” other fields — including “previous departure place” — continue to display “China (Taiwan).” Group and agency applications also retain the same “China (Taiwan)” designation. The government has responded with a series of measures, including adjusting how South Korean nationals are labeled in its own systems and signaling further changes if no response is received by the end of the month. Photo: Don Huh INTEREST FROM ANTI-CHINA SUPPORTERS Media coverage in South Korea has run along political lines. The Dong-A Ilbo, a conservative, pro-opposition party and anti-China newspaper, reported on the issue at least five times, with reader comments often criticizing the government for being too cautious in its China policy. One widely liked comment on March 18 suggested that Taiwan should start referring to South Korea as “South Joson” (南朝鮮), a designation primarily used by North Korea until recently. It was also used by China before 1992, but was dropped after a diplomatic detente between Seoul and Beijing, which saw the former break ties with Taipei in favor of the latter. Meanwhile, the Kyunghyang Shinmun, generally seen as more progressive, pro-government and pro-China, reported on the issue only once after Taiwan’s announcement. The article drew limited engagement, with relatively few comments and minimal interaction, suggesting the issue has not gained widespread attention among its readership. ‘SOUTH KOREA’ ALREADY WIDELY ACCEPTED Discussions on major Korean online forums reflect a similar pattern, with many users describing Taiwan’s countermeasures as having limited practical impact. Some noted that “South Korea” is already the widely accepted international term, viewing Taiwan’s move as largely symbolic. Han says the move is unlikely to provoke a strong response from either the South Korean government or the general public. However, he said some in South Korea’s intellectual class may interpret the issue through a broader regional lens. “They know Taiwan is Japan’s lifeline. Therefore, they may see this as part of wider tensions involving Taiwan, Japan and the US, rather than a bilateral issue alone,” he said. THE MOVE IS UNNECCSARY Han Ki-beom, a researcher at the Asan Institute for Policy Studies, said formally adopting “China (Taiwan)” in entry systems would mark a departure from established practice. “Given that Taiwan is already dissatisfied, there is no need to escalate the issue further,” Han Ki-beom said. He added that ties between Taiwan and South Korea have not deteriorated, and from the perspective of South Korean citizens, such a move would be unnecessary. Lee Jae-choon, South Korea’s former ambassador to the European Union and Russia, described the 1992 break in diplomatic relations with Taiwan as the result of poorly managed diplomacy by South Korea but acknowledged that unofficial exchanges have grown in the years since. Lee criticized South Korea’s hesitant participation in international operations like those in the Strait of Hormuz, linking it to broader concerns about offending China. “The current dispute is unfortunate given the overall improvement in ties,” Lee said, “Taiwan’s protest is ‘legitimate’.”
The “previous departure place” field for individual travelers is listed as “CHINA (TAIWAN)” on South Korea’s e-arrival card system.
Both the country and “previous departure place” fields in the group or agency application are listed as “CHINA (TAIWAN)” on South Korea’s e-arrival card system.
After Jurassic Park premiered in 1993, people began to ask if scientists could really bring long-lost species back from extinction, just like in the hit movie. The idea has triggered “de-extinction” debates in several countries, including Taiwan, where the focus has been on the Formosan clouded leopard (designated after 1917 as Neofelis nebulosa brachyura). National Taiwan Museum’s (NTM) Web site describes the Formosan clouded leopard as “a subspecies endemic to Taiwan…it reaches a body length of 0.6m to 1.2m and tail length of 0.7m to 0.9m and weighs between 15kg and 30kg. It is entirely covered with beautiful cloud-like spots
What was the population of Taiwan when the first Negritos arrived? In 500BC? The 1st century? The 18th? These questions are important, because they can contextualize the number of babies born last month, 6,523, to all the people on Taiwan, indigenous and colonial alike. That figure represents a year on year drop of 3,884 babies, prefiguring total births under 90,000 for the year. It also represents the 26th straight month of deaths exceeding births. Why isn’t this a bigger crisis? Because we don’t experience it. Instead, what we experience is a growing and more diverse population. POPULATION What is Taiwan’s actual population?
Just after 6am, I walked up to the ticket gate at Taipei Main Station and entered the Taiwan Railway platform without scanning any ticket; instead, I flashed the Sanrio Fun Rail pass on my phone to the gate worker and was admitted. I found my train and prepared to board. My destination? This very same station. I was embarking on a 13-hour journey on one of two round-the-island trains operated by ezTravel. They run each day, one counterclockwise around the island and one clockwise. They differ in a number of ways from an ordinary Taiwan Railway train and can make for
Big news this last week as President William Lai (賴清德) came out in support of restarting at least two of the nation’s mothballed nuclear plants. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has long advocated a “nuclear-free” homeland. This possibility had been building since 2023 during the run-up to the 2024 presidential election, when then-DPP presidential candidate Lai, who would eventually go on to win, indicated he was open to restarting at least one plant. As premier, Lai’s policies for addressing Taiwan’s numerous urgent problems displayed neither great imagination nor a propensity to resist the DPP’s drift into the arms of Taiwan’s business
RSS