Sun, Mar 29, 2026 page12

• South Korea’s view on the “China (Taiwan)” spat

  Taipei’s protest over South Korea’s ‘China (Taiwan)’ e-entry wording may look symbolic, but analysts say it points to Seoul’s one-China balancing and Taiwan’s increasingly reciprocal diplomacy

  • By Don Huh / Contributing reporter in Seoul
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Jason Han says that the e-arrival card spat between South Korea and Taiwan shows that Seoul is signaling adherence to its “one-China” policy, while Taiwan’s response reflects a reciprocal approach.

  “Attempts to alter the diplomatic status quo often lead to tit-for-tat responses,” the analyst on international affairs tells the Taipei Times, adding that Taiwan may become more cautious in its dealings with South Korea going forward.

  Taipei has called on Seoul to correct its electronic entry system, which currently lists Taiwan as “China (Taiwan),” warning that reciprocal measures may follow if the wording is not changed before March 31. As of yesterday, South Korea’s foreign ministry has yet to do so. The e-arrival card system fully replaced paper forms in December last year. When filling out the paper arrival cards, Taiwanese would typically fill out “Taiwan” as their home country. With the digital system, Taiwanese are now forced to choose “China (Taiwan)”.

  

  The “previous departure place” field for individual travelers is listed as “CHINA (TAIWAN)” on South Korea’s e-arrival card system.

  Photo: Don Huh

  A Taipei Times review yesterday found inconsistencies in the e-arrival card system: while the nationality field for individual travelers is listed as “Taiwan,” other fields — including “previous departure place” — continue to display “China (Taiwan).”

  Group and agency applications also retain the same “China (Taiwan)” designation.

  The government has responded with a series of measures, including adjusting how South Korean nationals are labeled in its own systems and signaling further changes if no response is received by the end of the month.

  

  Both the country and “previous departure place” fields in the group or agency application are listed as “CHINA (TAIWAN)” on South Korea’s e-arrival card system.

  Photo: Don Huh

  INTEREST FROM ANTI-CHINA SUPPORTERS

  Media coverage in South Korea has run along political lines.

  The Dong-A Ilbo, a conservative, pro-opposition party and anti-China newspaper, reported on the issue at least five times, with reader comments often criticizing the government for being too cautious in its China policy.

  One widely liked comment on March 18 suggested that Taiwan should start referring to South Korea as “South Joson” (南朝鮮), a designation primarily used by North Korea until recently. It was also used by China before 1992, but was dropped after a diplomatic detente between Seoul and Beijing, which saw the former break ties with Taipei in favor of the latter.

  Meanwhile, the Kyunghyang Shinmun, generally seen as more progressive, pro-government and pro-China, reported on the issue only once after Taiwan’s announcement. The article drew limited engagement, with relatively few comments and minimal interaction, suggesting the issue has not gained widespread attention among its readership.

  ‘SOUTH KOREA’ ALREADY WIDELY ACCEPTED

  Discussions on major Korean online forums reflect a similar pattern, with many users describing Taiwan’s countermeasures as having limited practical impact. Some noted that “South Korea” is already the widely accepted international term, viewing Taiwan’s move as largely symbolic.

  Han says the move is unlikely to provoke a strong response from either the South Korean government or the general public.

  However, he said some in South Korea’s intellectual class may interpret the issue through a broader regional lens.

  “They know Taiwan is Japan’s lifeline. Therefore, they may see this as part of wider tensions involving Taiwan, Japan and the US, rather than a bilateral issue alone,” he said.

  THE MOVE IS UNNECCSARY

  Han Ki-beom, a researcher at the Asan Institute for Policy Studies, said formally adopting “China (Taiwan)” in entry systems would mark a departure from established practice.

  “Given that Taiwan is already dissatisfied, there is no need to escalate the issue further,” Han Ki-beom said.

  He added that ties between Taiwan and South Korea have not deteriorated, and from the perspective of South Korean citizens, such a move would be unnecessary.

  Lee Jae-choon, South Korea’s former ambassador to the European Union and Russia, described the 1992 break in diplomatic relations with Taiwan as the result of poorly managed diplomacy by South Korea but acknowledged that unofficial exchanges have grown in the years since.

  Lee criticized South Korea’s hesitant participation in international operations like those in the Strait of Hormuz, linking it to broader concerns about offending China.

  “The current dispute is unfortunate given the overall improvement in ties,” Lee said, “Taiwan’s protest is ‘legitimate’.”
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Kenting park officer wins international photography award

  • 2

    Large bamboo viper catch in Tainan puzzles bureau

  • 3

    Horse euthanized after winning the Grand National race

  • 4

    Eight million barrels of oil to set sail for Taiwan this month

  • 5

    First bluefin tuna of season sells for record NT$10,600 per kg in Pingtung