Jason Han says that the e-arrival card spat between South Korea and Taiwan shows that Seoul is signaling adherence to its “one-China” policy, while Taiwan’s response reflects a reciprocal approach.
“Attempts to alter the diplomatic status quo often lead to tit-for-tat responses,” the analyst on international affairs tells the Taipei Times, adding that Taiwan may become more cautious in its dealings with South Korea going forward.
Taipei has called on Seoul to correct its electronic entry system, which currently lists Taiwan as “China (Taiwan),” warning that reciprocal measures may follow if the wording is not changed before March 31. As of yesterday, South Korea’s foreign ministry has yet to do so. The e-arrival card system fully replaced paper forms in December last year. When filling out the paper arrival cards, Taiwanese would typically fill out “Taiwan” as their home country. With the digital system, Taiwanese are now forced to choose “China (Taiwan)”.
Photo: Don Huh
A Taipei Times review yesterday found inconsistencies in the e-arrival card system: while the nationality field for individual travelers is listed as “Taiwan,” other fields — including “previous departure place” — continue to display “China (Taiwan).”
Group and agency applications also retain the same “China (Taiwan)” designation.
The government has responded with a series of measures, including adjusting how South Korean nationals are labeled in its own systems and signaling further changes if no response is received by the end of the month.
Photo: Don Huh
INTEREST FROM ANTI-CHINA SUPPORTERS
Media coverage in South Korea has run along political lines.
The Dong-A Ilbo, a conservative, pro-opposition party and anti-China newspaper, reported on the issue at least five times, with reader comments often criticizing the government for being too cautious in its China policy.
One widely liked comment on March 18 suggested that Taiwan should start referring to South Korea as “South Joson” (南朝鮮), a designation primarily used by North Korea until recently. It was also used by China before 1992, but was dropped after a diplomatic detente between Seoul and Beijing, which saw the former break ties with Taipei in favor of the latter.
Meanwhile, the Kyunghyang Shinmun, generally seen as more progressive, pro-government and pro-China, reported on the issue only once after Taiwan’s announcement. The article drew limited engagement, with relatively few comments and minimal interaction, suggesting the issue has not gained widespread attention among its readership.
‘SOUTH KOREA’ ALREADY WIDELY ACCEPTED
Discussions on major Korean online forums reflect a similar pattern, with many users describing Taiwan’s countermeasures as having limited practical impact. Some noted that “South Korea” is already the widely accepted international term, viewing Taiwan’s move as largely symbolic.
Han says the move is unlikely to provoke a strong response from either the South Korean government or the general public.
However, he said some in South Korea’s intellectual class may interpret the issue through a broader regional lens.
“They know Taiwan is Japan’s lifeline. Therefore, they may see this as part of wider tensions involving Taiwan, Japan and the US, rather than a bilateral issue alone,” he said.
THE MOVE IS UNNECCSARY
Han Ki-beom, a researcher at the Asan Institute for Policy Studies, said formally adopting “China (Taiwan)” in entry systems would mark a departure from established practice.
“Given that Taiwan is already dissatisfied, there is no need to escalate the issue further,” Han Ki-beom said.
He added that ties between Taiwan and South Korea have not deteriorated, and from the perspective of South Korean citizens, such a move would be unnecessary.
Lee Jae-choon, South Korea’s former ambassador to the European Union and Russia, described the 1992 break in diplomatic relations with Taiwan as the result of poorly managed diplomacy by South Korea but acknowledged that unofficial exchanges have grown in the years since.
Lee criticized South Korea’s hesitant participation in international operations like those in the Strait of Hormuz, linking it to broader concerns about offending China.
“The current dispute is unfortunate given the overall improvement in ties,” Lee said, “Taiwan’s protest is ‘legitimate’.”
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry consumes electricity at rates that would strain most national grids. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) alone accounted for more than 9 percent, or 2,590 megawatts (MW), of the nation’s power demand last year. The factories that produce chips for the world’s phones and servers run around the clock. They cannot tolerate blackouts. Yet Taiwan imports 97 percent of its energy, with liquefied natural gas reserves measured in days. Underground, Taiwan has options. Studies from National Taiwan University estimate recoverable geothermal resources at more than 33,000 MW. Current installed capacity stands below 10 MW. OBSTACLES Despite Taiwan’s significant geothermal potential, the
In our discussions of tourism in Taiwan we often criticize the government’s addiction to promoting food and shopping, while ignoring Taiwan’s underdeveloped trekking and adventure travel opportunities. This discussion, however, is decidedly land-focused. When was the last time a port entered into it? Last week I encountered journalist and travel writer Cameron Dueck, who had sailed to Taiwan in 2023-24, and was full of tales. Like everyone who visits, he and his partner Fiona Ching loved our island nation and had nothing but wonderful experiences on land. But he had little positive to say about the way Taiwan has organized its
The entire Li Zhenxiu (李貞秀) saga has been an ugly, complicated mess. Born in China’s Hunan Province, she moved to work in Shenzhen, where she met her future Taiwanese husband. Most accounts have her arriving in Taiwan and marrying somewhere between 1993 and 1999. She built a successful career in Taiwan in the tech industry before founding her own company. She also served in high-ranking positions on various environmentally-focused tech associations. She says she was inspired by the founding of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) in 2019 by Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), and began volunteering for the party soon after. Ko
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chair Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) returned from her trip to meet People’s Republic of China (PRC) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) bearing “a gift” for the people of Taiwan: 10 measures the PRC proposed to “facilitate the peaceful development of cross-strait relations.” “China on Sunday unveiled 10 new incentive measures for Taiwan,” wrote Reuters, wrongly. The PRC’s longstanding habit with Taiwan relations is to repackage already extant or once-existing policies and declare that they are “new.” The list forwarded by Cheng reflects that practice. NEW MEASURES? Note the first item: establishing regular communication mechanisms between the Chinese Communist Party
RSS