Hidden in a maze of factories in the heart of this northeastern Chinese port city is the house Gunther von Hagens built -- and, for many, a place where nightmares are created.
Inside von Hagens' sprawling, well-guarded compound, behind a leaning metal fence pocked with holes, are more than 800 human beings -- 200 of his staffers and 645 dead bodies in steel cases from almost a dozen nations.
PHOTO: AP
The anatomist, whose exhibits of preserved human corpses have riled religious leaders in Europe and attracted the curious and the outraged across the world, set up shop here three years ago to process bodies for his shows.
PHOTO: AP
Last month, media reports from von Hagens' native Germany asserted that at least two of the corpses, both Chinese, had bullet holes in their skulls -- the method China uses for execution. It's a charge that von Hagens rejects vehemently, saying all his specimens were donated by people who signed releases.
``I absolutely prohibit and do not accept death penalty bodies,'' von Hagens, a tall, thin man in a fedora, said this week during a rare tour of his Dalian facility.
PHOTO: AP
But, he added, ``Many things can happen. ... I cannot exclude that [possibility].''
PHOTO: AP
Von Hagens launched his Body Worlds exhibits in 1997 and has shown them to nearly 14 million people from Japan and South Korea to Britain and Germany. Shows are running now in Frankfurt, Germany, and Singapore.
The displays feature healthy and diseased body parts as well as skinned, whole corpses in assorted poses -- a rider atop a horse, a pregnant woman reclining -- that show off the preservation technique von Hagens developed in 1977.
Dubbed ``plastination,'' the process replaces bodily fluids and fat with epoxy and silicone, making the bodies durable for exhibition and study.
Though authorities in Dalian have made no public allegations against the operation, it has drawn the attention of the Chinese media. ``Does the corpse factory have a trade secret?'' asked theBeijing Morning Post.
``Investigation into the secrets of Dalian's corpse processing plant,'' read another in theBeijing Evening News.
Li Renzhen, a Dalian taxi driver, said, ``I don't know what they are doing in there. But according to Chinese tradition, we should show respect for dead bodies.''
He shook his head.
``If they are used to make money, it's unthinkable.''
The German weekly Der Spiegel said in January that von Hagens ran a ``shabby business,'' buying cheap corpses -- including executed Chinese -- and marketing them for profit. A British newspaper, The Daily Telegraph, said German lawyers also were investigating whether von Hagens used executed Chinese
prisoners.
The allegations echoed charges from 2001, when von Hagens was accused of using a Russian prisoner's body. Von Hagens said that corpse was a German who donated his body.
Von Hagens said his staff searched their cache of bodies after the Der Spiegel article appeared and found seven with ``different kinds of head injuries.'' He said he planned to incinerate those to be certain execution victims are not used.
``There is no case opened against me,'' said von Hagens, 59. ``Nobody accuses me ... of doing anything criminal, anything against the law.''
However, prosecutors in Heidelberg, Germany, say they are pursuing allegations that von Hagens used bodies of Chinese prisoners to determine whether they have grounds to launch a full-scale investigation into possible charges of human rights violations for using corpses of people who had not given consent while still living.
``We are looking into it right now,'' said Elke O'Donoghue, spokeswoman for prosecutors in Heidelberg. She could not say how long the process would take.
Critics, including the Lutheran and Roman Catholic churches, have also denounced von Hagens' work as disrespectful to the dead. He says he simply helps people understand their bodies.
In Frankfurt, authorities have warned parents not to allow children younger than 14 to view the exhibit, which they said could ``shock and frighten.''
At a London show, a visitor took a hammer to one of the bodies -- a man holding a liver -- while another threw a blanket over the corpse of a pregnant woman, saying he could not bear to look at the fetus.
``It's a very emotional topic,'' acknowledged von Hagens, dubbed ``Dr. Frankenstein'' in November after performing Britain's first public autopsy in more than 170 years. Even in Dalian, one of his employees jokingly referred to him as ``Dr. Death.''
In one airy room, skinned corpses wrapped in white cloth and covered in plastic lay stretched out on tables, surrounded by ``dissectors'' -- many of them medical students. They hunched over the bodies, picking out fat and tissue with tweezers. In another area, bodies hung ``curing'' with gas, light or heat.
Each body requires up to 1,500 hours of work to prepare, von Hagens says. In their final plasticized state, the corpses are rubbery to the touch with a crystalline finish -- the color of raw pork.
The room where the bodies are assembled into position is large and sunny and filled with models in different stages of production -- a snowboarder here, an ice-skater there. In one area, a dead man poses in an homage to Rodin's The Thinker.
Von Hagens, too, is thinking these days -- about how to quiet his critics without giving up his life's endeavor.
``I'm sure I will survive this storm in the water glass as I have survived so many before,'' von Hagens said. ``I touch here a taboo, which is our body, and nothing is so near as our body is to us.''
He adds, ``I know that I am innocent. This gives me a good feeling and good sleep every day.''
Oct. 27 to Nov. 2 Over a breakfast of soymilk and fried dough costing less than NT$400, seven officials and engineers agreed on a NT$400 million plan — unaware that it would mark the beginning of Taiwan’s semiconductor empire. It was a cold February morning in 1974. Gathered at the unassuming shop were Economics minister Sun Yun-hsuan (孫運璿), director-general of Transportation and Communications Kao Yu-shu (高玉樹), Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) president Wang Chao-chen (王兆振), Telecommunications Laboratories director Kang Pao-huang (康寶煌), Executive Yuan secretary-general Fei Hua (費驊), director-general of Telecommunications Fang Hsien-chi (方賢齊) and Radio Corporation of America (RCA) Laboratories director Pan
The consensus on the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chair race is that Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) ran a populist, ideological back-to-basics campaign and soundly defeated former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), the candidate backed by the big institutional players. Cheng tapped into a wave of popular enthusiasm within the KMT, while the institutional players’ get-out-the-vote abilities fell flat, suggesting their power has weakened significantly. Yet, a closer look at the race paints a more complicated picture, raising questions about some analysts’ conclusions, including my own. TURNOUT Here is a surprising statistic: Turnout was 130,678, or 39.46 percent of the 331,145 eligible party
The classic warmth of a good old-fashioned izakaya beckons you in, all cozy nooks and dark wood finishes, as tables order a third round and waiters sling tapas-sized bites and assorted — sometimes unidentifiable — skewered meats. But there’s a romantic hush about this Ximending (西門町) hotspot, with cocktails savored, plating elegant and never rushed and daters and diners lit by candlelight and chandelier. Each chair is mismatched and the assorted tables appear to be the fanciest picks from a nearby flea market. A naked sewing mannequin stands in a dimly lit corner, adorned with antique mirrors and draped foliage
President William Lai (賴清德) has championed Taiwan as an “AI Island” — an artificial intelligence (AI) hub powering the global tech economy. But without major shifts in talent, funding and strategic direction, this vision risks becoming a static fortress: indispensable, yet immobile and vulnerable. It’s time to reframe Taiwan’s ambition. Time to move from a resource-rich AI island to an AI Armada. Why change metaphors? Because choosing the right metaphor shapes both understanding and strategy. The “AI Island” frames our national ambition as a static fortress that, while valuable, is still vulnerable and reactive. Shifting our metaphor to an “AI Armada”
RSS