On Sept. 28, the US House Committee on Foreign Affairs unanimously passed House Bill H.R.3320, which directs the US secretary of state to develop a strategy to regain observer status for Taiwan in the World Health Assembly (WHA). It was initiated by Republican representatives Ted Yoho and Steve Chabot, together with Democratic representatives Brad Sherman and Gerald Connolly.
The bill was passed by the US House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific on July 27, and was endorsed by the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, which is chaired by US Representative Ed Royce.
The bill has been sent to the US House of Representatives for a vote.
The next step is pushing for the US Senate to pass the bill and have it signed into law by the US president.
Over the past decades, the Foundation of Medical Professionals Alliance in Taiwan (FMPAT) has visited congresses, government branches and non-governmental organizations in like-minded nations, such as the US, Japan and those in Europe, to lobby for Taiwan’s participation in the WHO.
The progression of achievements — although with some frustrations — has shown that ceaseless lobbying is of paramount importance for rallying international support for Taiwan’s cause.
Therefore, to strengthen the US’ commitment to addressing Taiwan’s participation in global health affairs, people must continue lobbying the US for its support — especially for the Senate to pass the bill — and urge the US president to sign the bill into law.
With tremendous efforts over the past two decades from the public sector and civil organizations, such as the Formosan Association for Public Affairs and FMPAT, both the US House and the Senate have passed several bills in support of Taiwan’s participation in the WHO.
Furthermore, in 1997, 2001, 2003 and 2004, US presidents signed several bills into public law — 106-137,107-10,107-158, 108-28 and 108-235 — which require the US government to support Taiwan’s participation in the WHO.
Public Law 108-235, which was passed in 2004, requires the US secretary of state to submit a report to the US Congress prior to April 1 each year on US efforts to support Taiwan’s participation in the international body.
Until now, regardless of political party, the US Department of State’s continuous adherence to the requirement has indicated the long-term benefits of enacting pro-Taiwan bills in the US.
Apart from mandating the department’s report on strategies to regain Taiwan’s observer status in the WHA, the new bill also instructs the US secretary of state to report how the department has improved its strategies to help Taiwan on this issue following any annual meetings of the WHA.
The US government has passed this bill in response to China’s senseless pressures on preventing Taiwan from attending the WHA this year.
In the short term, if this bill becomes law, the promotion of Taiwan’s participation will enter a new stage and further encourage other nations to follow suit.
However, as I have been proposing during my visits to foreign embassies in Taiwan, the long-term strategy should be lobbying each nation to push the WHA to pass a resolution to normalize nation’s participation in the WHA each year and would thus stop Taiwan from being used as a bargaining chip in political deals.
Lin Shih-chia is executive director of the Foundation of Medical Professional Alliance in Taiwan and a former Taiwan Solidarity Union legislator.
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
RSS