Unfortunately, in the US many do not know the difference between Taiwan and Thailand. Mention Taiwan and a common response might be that the shopping in Bangkok is great or the beaches at Pattaya are beyond compare.
While Taiwan has an important story to tell in terms of economic and political development, the nation does not tell it well.
In fact, Taiwan contributes to its own relatively low global profile and overshadowing by China. More significantly, public opinion polling done by highly respected Pew Research shows that in the event of aggressive military action by China toward Taiwan, popular support for coming to the nation’s assistance is quite low in the US.
In many ways, Taiwan is disappearing off of the map, but it need not be that way.
The nation can help turn the situation around by following the examples of other countries that maintain close relations with the US.
Israel, Germany, France and Japan maintain day-long English-language cable TV broadcast capabilities in the US.
Recently, China’s CCTV started China 24, which broadcasts round-the-clock in English, offering a wide spectrum of programming about Chinese affairs, Chinese culture, global events and more, while maintaining very high quality and being surprisingly limited in overt propaganda.
Future Taiwanese cable TV broadcasting in the US must not be simply limited to political coverage. It must seek more broadly to introduce viewers to all aspects of Taiwanese society, culture, food, travelogues, natural beauty — anything that makes the viewer conscious that there is a “Taiwan.”
Moreover, with few exceptions, US universities give little attention to Taiwan.
When university administrators or faculty members are asked whether their department, college, or university has a course about Taiwan, a common response is “We tuck a section on Taiwan in at the end of our courses bout China.”
To right this situation, Taiwan must follow the example of former Japanese prime minister Kakuei Tanaka, who in the 1970s provided 10 US universities with US$1 million each to promote Japanese studies.
Such an investment by the nation in promoting Taiwan studies would be very timely, given that students are far more apt to develop careers abut China than Taiwan.
Older academics who have specialized on Taiwan are aging and retiring with no one to take their places. US residents knowledgeable about Taiwanese affairs would help influence US popular opinion.
When we compare Taiwan with China in terms of quality of life, educational opportunity, social welfare, freedoms of press and speech, technological innovation, services, and the like, Taiwan is the clear victor. Yet, the nation sits back and allows itself to be overshadowed by its larger neighbor as though it is helpless.
William Sharp Jr is a faculty member of Hawaii Pacific University in Honolulu.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS