Taiwan on life support
When President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) was re-elected, many Taiwanese were concerned it could be the last democratic election in Taiwan.
It seemed from the start that Ma was determined to make Taiwan commit national suicide by insisting that the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) beloved “one China” principle was the only acceptable legal status for Taiwan.
For five years, Ma has seemed content to view Taiwan as a mere pimple on the totalitarian butt of the People’s Republic of China (PRC).
In most democratic societies the people get (or in some cases deserve) what they vote for, so long as elections are free and fair. In this way, Taiwan’s populace voted for “euthanizing” Taiwan when it elected Ma a second time.
Time will tell if Ma can accomplish his party’s dream of killing Taiwan and resurrecting the Republic of China as some kind of muddled abomination made up of the worst of the PRC and Taiwan.
Taipei Times reporter Chris Wang’s recent article discussed a forum held by Taiwan Thinktank (“Ma in ‘international legal suicide,’” June 3, page 3). The piece says it is presumptuous for Taiwanese to expect the rest of the world to understand Taiwan is independent when the nation’s democratically elected president firmly supports the “one China” principle, with his head planted up the hindquarters of the Chinese Communist Party.
However, if a million Taiwanese get on the streets to show their support for the nation’s democracy, the international community will sit up and take notice.
A fair number of experts seem to think that as long as Taiwan remains schizophrenic in its relationship with China, with some supporting a free Taiwan and others supporting a China-dominated Taiwan, no foreign government will come to Taiwan’s aid. China will continue to argue any issues between it and Taiwan are “domestic issues,” since Taiwan’s government essentially agrees.
Taiwan is perhaps on life support now, with KMT doctors huddled round its bed ready to call the patient dead, and an eager Ma ready to give consent to pull the plug.
The international community might find a way to thwart the efforts of China and the KMT to kill Taiwan, but there is very little hope such support would come from the decidedly weak administration of US President Barack Obama.
In five years, this administration has said almost nothing about Taiwan, despite Obama’s supposed pivot toward Asia.
Support will have to continue to come from the US Congress, which has traditionally been strident about supporting Taiwan and opposing the PRC.
Taiwan continues to be the key geographical impediment to the PRC’s hegemonic conquest of the Pacific.
While the US Department of State under this weak president and secretary of state may hanker for a “peace” of some kind between Taiwan and the PRC, the surrendering Ma will not satisfy them.
Ma seems to value everything counter to the best interests of those interested in democracy and those in the Pacific region anxious to maintain freedom from the PRC’s threats and blackmail. This would also apply to the US.
Declaring Taiwan’s independence is not necessary, as Taiwan is already independent.
What is necessary is guaranteeing the survival of Taiwan.
This means it is essential that Taiwanese make it clear to the international community that the majority of the population does not wish Taiwan to be part of China, nor do they wish to go to war with China.
Rather they wish to continue to survive until the PRC perishes from the weight of its own totalitarian cruelty and malice.
This voice of Taiwanese taking to the streets could serve as a strong counterweight to the government’s one-sided cheering for the PRC and make the world recognize that few in Taiwan yearn to be part of totalitarian China.
Lee Long-hwa
Los Angeles, California
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS