Taiwan’s democracy has often been touted as a successful story, but a recent disturbing media report concerning former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) suggests the nation is still a fragile democracy in which transitional justice remains lacking and the residue of authoritarian worship can still be felt.
A section on the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall’s Web site meant to introduce Chiang’s life story to children was recently discovered by parents to be scattered with sycophantic, hyperbolic praise of the late dictator.
Titled “Stories of Grandfather Chiang,” the section describes Chiang as the “savior of mankind” and “a great leader for the world,” who had “a heart full of goodness and kindness.”
“He forgave past wrongs done against him by old foes. He repaid enemies’ malevolence with kindness,” it says of “the revered President Chiang.”
The myth-making and worshiping of Chiang is dumbfounding considering that, as recently as February, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), in an address marking the 66th anniversary of the 228 Incident, again apologized for the former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime’s brutal and bloody crackdown on dissent, and issued a call for greater awareness of this part of history.
It comes as yet another irony that Ma then turned around and on Thursday last week paid solemn tribute to Chiang — the main culprit behind the 228 Massacre, as reported in The 228 Incident: A Report on Responsibility published by the 228 Incident Memorial Foundation in 2006.
Seen against this background, many have to doubt Ma’s sincerity when he apologized to massacre victims and said that he could empathize with what they had gone through. It was to many’s wonder, after all, that Ma could look family members of the victims in the eye when he personally issued them certificates that officially “restored the reputations” of the victims of the 228 Massacre, when, a few days later, his eyes glistened as he paid homage to the man who was primarily responsible for inflicting such grief on victims of the White Terror and their families.
Statues of the main instigator of the White Terror are everywhere, from public parks to school campuses, from district courts to railway stations, from streets bearing his name to the various figurines portraying Chiang as a smiling grandfather-like figure.
How does the president expect the public to take him seriously when he says that he wishes the nation’s educators could help the public better understand the lessons of history and to cherish human rights when he remains silent on how little transitional justice is being implemented.
In view of the Ma administration’s inaction in addressing transitional justice, it is little wonder that distorted values and sycophantic “hero”-worship, such as the case of the Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall’s Web site, continues to find its way to members of the public.
Action speaks louder than words. Ma can lecture all he wants about the values of human rights and apologize every year to mark the anniversary of the 228 Massacre, but until his administration takes concrete steps to eradicate all sorts of totalitarian worship that permeate virtually all corners of the nation, Ma will remain unfit to trumpet having advanced the cause of democracy as his administration’s achievement because he is as culpable as anyone else for allowing authoritarian worship of Chiang to continue.
During the US-India Strategic Partnership Forum’s third leadership summit on Aug. 31, US Deputy Secretary of State Stephen Biegun said that the US wants to partner with the other members of the Quadrilaterial Security Dialogue — Australia, India and Japan — to establish an organization similar to NATO, to “respond to ... any potential challenge from China.” He said that the US’ purpose is to work with these nations and other countries in the Indo-Pacific region to “create a critical mass around the shared values and interest of those parties,” and possibly attract more countries to establish an alliance comparable to
On August 24, 2020, the US Secretary of Defense, Mark Esper, made an important statement: “The Pentagon is Prepared for China.” Going forward, how might the Department of Defense team up with Taiwan to make itself even more prepared? No American wants to deter the next war by a paper-thin margin, and no one appreciates the value of strategic overmatch more than the war planners at the Pentagon. When the stakes are this high, you can bet they want to be super ready. In recent months, we have witnessed a veritable flood of high-level statements from US government leaders on
China has long sought shortcuts to developing semiconductor technologies and local supply chains by poaching engineers and experts from Taiwan and other nations. It is also suspected of stealing trade secrets from Taiwanese and US firms to fulfill its ambition of becoming a major player in the global semiconductor industry in the next decade. However, it takes more than just money and talent to build a semiconductor supply chain like the one which Taiwan and the US started to cultivate more than 30 years ago. Amid rising trade and technology tensions between the world’s two biggest economies, Beijing has become
With a new White House document in May — the “Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China” — the administration of US President Donald Trump has firmly set its hyper-competitive line to tackle geoeconomic and geostrategic rivalry, followed by several reinforcing speeches by Trump and other Cabinet-level officials. By identifying China as a near-equal rival, the strategy resonates well with the bipartisan consensus on China in today’s severely divided US. In the face of China’s rapidly growing aggression, the move is long overdue, yet relevant for the maintenance of the international “status quo.” The strategy seems to herald a new