Local governments in Taiwan’s five major cities and counties already have a serious amount of debt. The future mayors will need to have the skills to increase local finances or they will have to rely on funds and subsidies allocated by the central government, otherwise it will be very hard for them to deliver on the election promises they have been making. So why do they keep making these lofty promises?
For irresponsible political hacks, this is an easy matter to deal with. In the past, we have seen these types of politicians either fail to deliver on their election promises, blaming the central government, or borrow money to meet their promises, allowing future generations to pick up the tab.
How much money do the governments in Taiwan’s five largest municipalities owe? The figures that have been printed in the media about some of the administrations only reported the unpaid balances of those governments’ public debt; however, all cities and counties also have large “hidden deficits.”
Using information from an audit report prepared by the National Audit Office about total expenditures for city and county-level governments throughout the country, it is possible to calculate and produce statistics about the unpaid balance of public debt in all five special municipalities, as well as their hidden debt, to show a clear picture of overall debt and government debt per capita. This accurately shows the poor financial state that the country’s main cities and counties are in, which lets voters see how past governments have performed financially and indicates to candidates what sort of financial situations they will take over if they are elected.
Last year’s audit report revealed that up until the end of last year, of the eight cities and counties that will make up the soon-to-be five special municipalities, Taipei City had the highest overall debt at NT$291.7 billion (US$9.58 billion), followed by Kaohsiung City at NT$211.2 billion, Taipei County at NT$108.1 billion, Taichung County at NT$48.5 billion, Tainan County at NT$44.5 billion, Tainan City at NT$31.7 billion and Kaohsiung County at NT$26.4 billion. Taichung City had the lowest overall debt at NT$7.2 billion.
When we express these figures as government debt per capita, Kaohsiung City has the highest amount of government debt per capita at NT$138,245, followed by Taipei City at NT$111,873, Tainan City at NT$41,167, Tainan County at NT$40,263, Taichung County at NT$31,033, Taipei County at NT$27,899 and Kaohsiung County at NT$21,201. Taichung City again had the lowest government debt per capita at NT$6,725.
If we calculate these numbers based on the soon-to-be five special municipalities, we can see that Taipei City will have the highest level of government debt per capita at NT$111,872, followed by Greater Kaohsiung at NT$85,741, Greater Tainan at NT$40,634, Sinbei City at NT$27,899, while the lowest government debt per capita would be in Greater Taichung at NT$21,132.
With the elections little more than a week away, I would like to urge each candidate to face up to the financial problems in their respective governments and quit relying on the central government or future generations to pay their bills. They should come up with concrete and feasible plans to pay back their debt, as well as plans to raise funds for city and county development, as soon as possible. They should also promise to reach these goals during their tenure in office, otherwise they should promise to step down at the end of their term.
Yang Chung-hsin is a professor at Chinese Culture University’s Graduate Institute of Landscape Architecture.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
RSS