Don’t appease China
If China would leave Taiwan alone, the Taiwanese would never choose to go to war with China.
The problem is, for Taiwan today, there is no choice between peace and war. Peace is not the absence of war, but the presence of justice.
China taking over Taiwan would rob it of peace, democracy and human rights. China taking Taiwan would be an injustice that begets more injustice.
So the choice is between slavery or fighting for freedom — today through non-military means, but perhaps one day with weapons of war.
Unfortunately, many in Taiwan have deluded themselves into thinking that being annexed by China would be better than fighting for freedom. People from many other countries share the same delusion about China and Taiwan.
The late British prime minister Neville Chamberlain had similar delusions about Nazi Germany.
Allowing China to annex Taiwan would lead to more war in the future, with China’s aggressive expansionism, militant nationalism and Leninist imperialism felt by other neighboring countries — and not just ones on the border.
Furthermore, other brutish authoritarian regimes would be emboldened by the lack of consequences over China’s actions. Many other wars would be started by these regimes.
NAME WITHHELD
Animals have rights, too
Nestled in hills of lush greenery and surrounded by pineapple and sugarcane fields, the rustic college campus where I work offers a wonderful learning environment. Before the semester began, while strolling down the pink brick road, I saw a three-legged yellow dog — whom I called “Charlie” — skinny as a rail and looking hungry. I fed him my red bean pastry.
Another day, as I rode my bicycle to school, Suzuki, another stray dog, followed me all the way to my office in hopes of a bit of food. He was hungry enough to follow me about 1km. As I walked to my office, Fluffy, a white and orange cat, was scrounging through trash for leftovers.
The campus is bustling now with students and the Student Activity Center is packed with freshmen. The start of the school year affects the welfare of these stray dogs and cats.
One day I came across Charlie, wobbling along the road. He looked well-fed and content. Obviously he is in the good hands of some young students. Later, I saw one young woman brushing the hair of another stray and playing with him.
Suzuki no longer follows me — there is enough food from kind-hearted students. He even turned down my offer of a doughnut the other day.
Fluffy no longer whines from hunger and is rarely seen at garbage bins.
Education, at least at this campus, may play a role in making the younger generation more conscientious about the welfare of animals.
Such empathy on the part of the students speaks volumes about the success of civic education.
Of course, there is still much to be done to improve the treatment of animals in Taiwan when compared with the excellent treatment of pets in the US and other developed countries: better access to veterinarians, requirements for shots and the promotion of neutering and spaying to control the pet population.
There is no denying that more must be done to control the population of stray dogs and cats in Taiwan.
However, the fate of these animals is much worse in other Asian counties. We must object strongly to the eating of cats and dogs in some countries.
From a humanitarian point of view, we must respect the right to life for humans and animals alike. I tip my hat to the students on this campus who care about animal suffering and actually do something about it.
YANG CHIN-WEI
Chiayi
Stop focusing on China alone
With a tsunami in Samoa, an earthquake in Indonesia and typhoons and flooding in the Philippines, Taiwan’s government and humanitarian organizations should help out.
Taiwan is the Austronesian homeland of Hawaiiki and could be a leader in the Pacific and Indian Oceans. Taiwan has the resources and ability. Taiwan should stop focusing on China alone and look out toward the world.
JOEL LINTON
Taipei
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
RSS