Admiral Timothy Keating, the commander of the US Pacific Command, said in Washington that “it is very, very, very unlikely that there will be conflict across the Strait” in light of the current cross-strait situation. This explains why there have been no significant arms sales from the US to Taiwan recently. The reconciliation between Taiwan and China after President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) government came to power has not only affected the relations between Taiwan, China and the US, but has also made the strategic intentions of Beijing and Washington much clearer.
The possibility of a war between China and the US in the short-term because of the “Taiwan factor” has dropped dramatically. Washington will have time to rest and recuperate, and Beijing will be able to concentrate on its various internal conflicts, laying a foundation for its rise as the new hegemony. Possible points of conflict between the US and China are more likely to be issues such as international trade, human rights and global responsibility.
First, the easing of tensions between Taiwan and China also helps relieve tensions between the US and China, allowing Washington to employ a flexible China policy in the face of Beijing’s “peaceful rise.” After the normalization of China-US relations in 1979, to maintain both the trust of its allies and its dominant role in Southeast Asia, the US had been forced on several occasions to interfere with China’s attempt to claim Taiwan by force. Still, each US administration has tried hard to avoid a war, as such military interference would affect the economic and financial relations between the US and China. The US also tried to avoid triggering another “cold war” by using military force to defend Taiwan.
Therefore, the recent reconciliation between China and Taiwan is beneficial to the US and also highlights the significance that business will play in relations between China and the US.
Second, the US’ leading international position has been challenged around the world in recent years. China’s participation will be indispensable in the US’ attempts at using multilateral adjustment to reform the balance of international power. The US is skilled at using various international systems and Beijing will be a force in helping Washington revive itself.
For example, the US was able to eventually resolve the North Korean nuclear crisis thanks to China. Beijing also assisted in the US handling of Sudan’s Darfur conflict. It would thus be a great loss for the US to sacrifice its chances of further cooperation with China just for Taiwan. In essence, cross-strait reconciliation will lower the US’ political and military costs for stabilizing today’s global situation.
Third, if China changes the “status quo” across the Taiwan Strait by using military force, it is likely to destroy any opportunity it has of rising in power. But if China handles the issue peacefully, it will build a new path for itself to become a hegemony. The warming relations between Taiwan and China eliminate the possibility of a direct conflict between China and the US. As a result, China does not have to lose the results of its reform over the past three decades and can improve its international image in the process. All China has to do is wait for a suitable time to replace the US as the world’s leading superpower.
Taiwan’s attempt to challenge international consensus has been ended through cooperation between the US and China. The past decade proved Taiwan to be a troublemaker that wished to gain from a possible conflict between China and the US. Hence, both Beijing and Washington had to keep Taiwan in check on several occasions, as it walked into a dead-end alley and was marginalized internationally. Taiwan’s provocations actually supplied Beijing and Washington with a reason to communicate, as they had to clarify their strategic intentions.
Taiwan will have a hard time getting rid of its reputation as a “troublemaker” without the support of the US and China. Today, Beijing and Washington are the biggest winners from the reconciliation between China and Taiwan.
The US and China may come up with creative ways of encouraging Taiwan to stick to its policy of reconciling with Beijing. However, after business conflicts become a core issue between Beijing and Washington, the complex business relations that exist between Taiwan, China and the US will prove to be a hard test of the Taiwanese government’s wisdom.
Chen Hsin-chih is an associate professor of political science at National Cheng Kung University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
RSS