Mainland Affairs Council Vice Chairman Johnnason Liu (
It is no secret that many Web sites containing information Beijing considers "sensitive" are blocked from public access. Virtually all Web sites run by Taiwanese media outlets, as well as those that sell books and magazines, are declared off-limits. Indeed, Taiwan Yahoo's Internet Web site is blocked within China. It goes without saying that all Taiwanese government Web sites are inaccessible to the Chinese public.
The purpose is obviously to keep the Chinese from learning about news and information on Taiwan that could highlight their differences and incite social discontent and unrest. Frankly speaking, the Chinese government's fear of the potential impact of granting a free flow of information is not without basis.
Consider the case of the public's reaction to the arrest of President Chen Shui-bian's (
Contrast this to China, where corruption among high-ranking government officials and their family members is rampant and has become a major cause of social unrest. It would be unimaginable that the immediate family of a top official like Chen could be subjected to the same impartial treatment by the law and judiciary in China.
Fearing that the event would showcase the difference in Taiwan's and China's political and judiciary systems, Beijing has kept mum on Chao's case and eventual conviction early this year in Taiwan.
Despite Beijing's efforts, it has become virtually impossible to stop the free flow of information on the Internet. Even if the Chinese government manages to block some key Web sites, it cannot monitor and block out all Web sites which may contain "sensitive" information. Neither can it stop international coverage of key events in Taiwan which end up in foreign media Web sites.
As interaction between peoples from both sides of the Taiwan Strait increases, information continues to be exchanged -- be it through verbal communication or the print media. Add in all the Internet chat rooms where people can post news stories and publish their thoughts on these stories.
Blocking "sensitive" information is not the solution to maintaining social and political stability. Rather, Beijing should commit itself to reform to give the public hope that China could also follow in the footsteps of Taiwan and become democratized.
Political, social and economic reforms are urgent tasks for the Chinese government. With the free flow of information, the Chinese public, especially peole in rural areas, have increasingly become aware of the social and economic inequality that exists in China, and between it and the rest of the world. How can this gap be closed? That is the question Beijing needs to address.
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
RSS