Mainland Affairs Council Vice Chairman Johnnason Liu (
It is no secret that many Web sites containing information Beijing considers "sensitive" are blocked from public access. Virtually all Web sites run by Taiwanese media outlets, as well as those that sell books and magazines, are declared off-limits. Indeed, Taiwan Yahoo's Internet Web site is blocked within China. It goes without saying that all Taiwanese government Web sites are inaccessible to the Chinese public.
The purpose is obviously to keep the Chinese from learning about news and information on Taiwan that could highlight their differences and incite social discontent and unrest. Frankly speaking, the Chinese government's fear of the potential impact of granting a free flow of information is not without basis.
Consider the case of the public's reaction to the arrest of President Chen Shui-bian's (
Contrast this to China, where corruption among high-ranking government officials and their family members is rampant and has become a major cause of social unrest. It would be unimaginable that the immediate family of a top official like Chen could be subjected to the same impartial treatment by the law and judiciary in China.
Fearing that the event would showcase the difference in Taiwan's and China's political and judiciary systems, Beijing has kept mum on Chao's case and eventual conviction early this year in Taiwan.
Despite Beijing's efforts, it has become virtually impossible to stop the free flow of information on the Internet. Even if the Chinese government manages to block some key Web sites, it cannot monitor and block out all Web sites which may contain "sensitive" information. Neither can it stop international coverage of key events in Taiwan which end up in foreign media Web sites.
As interaction between peoples from both sides of the Taiwan Strait increases, information continues to be exchanged -- be it through verbal communication or the print media. Add in all the Internet chat rooms where people can post news stories and publish their thoughts on these stories.
Blocking "sensitive" information is not the solution to maintaining social and political stability. Rather, Beijing should commit itself to reform to give the public hope that China could also follow in the footsteps of Taiwan and become democratized.
Political, social and economic reforms are urgent tasks for the Chinese government. With the free flow of information, the Chinese public, especially peole in rural areas, have increasingly become aware of the social and economic inequality that exists in China, and between it and the rest of the world. How can this gap be closed? That is the question Beijing needs to address.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s