Being in Hong Kong, I can view KMT Chairman Lien Chan's upcoming trip to China with detachment, so I am amused by the controversy surrounding the trip.
Since Lien is neither a government official nor a legislator, he can only represent his party.
To pretend to speak for the government or the Taiwanese people will only reinforce the perception that he and his party still ignore the fact that they have lost two presidential elections, yet believe that they rule Taiwan.
Negotiating with Lien other than as KMT chairman would prove that Beijing is stuck in a time warp, is yet to come to terms with Taiwan's democratic changes and is still peddling the fiction that Taiwan is ruled by refugees of the civil war.
What can Lien discuss with his counterpart in the Chinese Communist Party? The only issue that remains open is the the civil war. The world has long accepted the CCP's victory in the civil war, but the KMT seems unable to grasp this reality.
Because the KMT has never formally admitted defeat, Beijing has been denied the closure it needs in this historical chapter.
So, Lien should use the opportunity to admit that his party lost.
Removing this old obstacle will permit both sides of the Strait to move ahead.
This will be the greatest contribution Lien can make and will help establish the legacy he seeks.
Instead of condemning a "so-called journey of peace," the ruling party should urge Lien to make the trip a true journey of peace.
Kenneth Choy
Hong Kong
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS