Last week saw Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), former Taipei mayor and founder of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), receive a 17-year sentence for crimes involving political corruption. This was only the opening round: the case is likely to drag on for several more years in appeals.
Both the TPP and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) are claiming that the prosecutors are engaging in a political witch hunt, green terror, fascism and so forth. It is easy to see this as a kind of compensation. After all, otherwise they would have to admit that the rather impressive collection of evidence against Ko actually meant something. But it is also an old theme, and one with particular functions and targets.
It is standard operating procedure for KMT targets of investigation to claim the prosecutors are working for the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), under investigation for corruption for the umpteenth time, last year blamed the DPP, saying it was in cahoots with the prosecutors and the media, for his troubles. He was found innocent.
Illustration: Courtesy of DPP caucus secretary-general Chen Pei-yu
Former KMT legislator Alex Tsai (蔡正元), also charged in that same case (which involved selling companies at below-market value) was not as lucky as Ma. He began serving his sentence last week, also claiming to be a victim of political persecution, and comparing himself to Ko. In the run-up to the 2024 election Ko had made a public appearance with Tsai, and Chiu Yi (邱毅), both far-right pro-China stalwarts.
In 2017 prosecutors raided the headquarters of the New Party while investigating an espionage case. The New Party was a far-right KMT spin-off. New Party officials complained of “green terror” and said it was politics. Ma Ying-jeou said it was fascism. As I remarked at the time, an admirer of one dictator and servant of another, Ma probably knows a bit about fascism.
Similarly in 2016, when the Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) administration and the DPP-controlled legislature were working on drafts of the transitional justice act, Alex Tsai accused the DPP of initiating “green terror.”
Photo: TT file photo
The DPP in 2007 introduced a draft “Special Law on the Determination of Responsibility for Government Illegalities during the February 28th Incident (of 1947) and the Martial Law Period,” one KMT lawmaker declaimed that the “green terror” of seven and half years of DPP governance was “over 10 times worse” than the KMT’s “white terror.” That was when the KMT controlled the legislature.
These comments have two functions. As with any cult, one function of obvious reality-denying assertions is to signal the speaker’s devotion to the cult and its leaders. People who utter things like “green terror!” know perfectly well there is no such thing. They are simply showing their commitment to the KMT’s views.
AD NAUSEAM
More importantly, the attacks on the prosecutors, habitual for the last two decades with KMT officials and lawmakers under investigation are also a component of the KMT’s efforts to render governance by the DPP illegitimate. Propaganda, in order to be effective, need not be much related to reality, but it must be repeated. Hence, for two decades that has been the official line.
Last week also saw important revelations of how rule of law and pro-Taiwan governance were under attack by the pro-China parties. Prosecutors indicted Chinese immigrant spouse Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) with helping Beijing interfere in elections. Xu is close to the TPP, which once offered her a party list legislator nomination. The New Taipei City Prosecutor’s office said in the indictment that Xu, despite being a legal resident, had remained loyal to China and had spied on local immigrant communities and meddled in elections on Beijing’s behalf. Prosecutors charged her with violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) and the Banking Act (銀行法), along with fraud and forgery.
According to media reports, Xu had moved over to the TPP from the KMT, since she felt the latter did not support Chinese spouses and would not nominate one for the legislature. She campaigned for TPP candidates, according to prosecutors, at the orders of Beijing.
The offer to Xu shows that the TPP’s goal was to get a citizen of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) into the legislature, not to put a particular person into the legislature. When Xu turned them down, the TPP instead appointed Chinese citizen Li Zhenxiu (李貞秀), leading to the mess currently underway in the legislature, where a foreign national with dual citizenship now sits, apparently a gross violation of the constitution and the law. DPP officials and lawmakers are refusing to interact with her in the legislature because she is so obviously an illegal appointment.
The appointment of a PRC national was deliberate, the obvious intent is to cause chaos. If the Constitutional Court strikes down her appointment, the TPP and KMT will claim — what else? — the DPP is engaging in authoritarianism. If the Court recognizes her appointment, the ramifications of that will be far-reaching, effectively a ruling that PRC citizens are ROC citizens as well, and perhaps that dual nationals can not only exist, but hold seats in the legislature. A win-win situation for the pro-China parties.
The offer to Xu also raises another question: how much did TPP officials know about her alleged connections to Beijing when they asked her to become a legislator? Consider: prosecutors alleged that Xu had been suborned on trips to the PRC, which TPP officials must have known about when they vetted her. According to the indictment, Xu arranged for Sun Xian (孫憲), an official of the Shanghai branch of the Revolutionary Committee of the Chinese Kuomintang, to enter Taiwan in October last year, providing false itineraries and false information to hide Sun’s real identity, and meet KMT Vice Chairman Chi Lin-lien (季麟連), and TPP official Lee Wei-hua (李偉華), among others.
If the prosecutors are right, Xu had to tell the TPP officials who he really was, otherwise why would they bother to meet him? She had to have revealed that his identity was a secret that she knew. It is hard to imagine how any TPP or KMT official meeting with Sun would not then have known that Xu was working on behalf of Beijing. When she revealed Sun’s true identity, she revealed her own.
The TPP knew it was appointing a PRC citizen when it sought out Xu for a legislative seat. The question is: did they want her in that position not only because she was a PRC citizen, but also because she was a PRC agent?
What did they know, and when did they know it?
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
The problem with Marx’s famous remark that history repeats itself, first as tragedy, the second time as farce, is that the first time is usually farce as well. This week Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chair Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made a pilgrimage to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) “to confer, converse and otherwise hob-nob” with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officials. The visit was an instant international media hit, with major media reporting almost entirely shorn of context. “Taiwan’s main opposition leader landed in China Tuesday for a rare visit aimed at cross-strait ‘peace’”, crowed Agence-France Presse (AFP) from Shanghai. Rare!
What is the importance within the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) of the meeting between Xi Jinping (習近平), the leader Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), the leader of the KMT? Local media is an excellent guide to determine how important — or unimportant — a news event is to the public. Taiwan has a vast online media ecosystem, and if a news item is gaining traction among readers, editors shift resources in near real time to boost coverage to meet the demand and drive up traffic. Cheng’s China trip is among the top headlines, but by no means
A recent report from the Environmental Management Administration of the Ministry of Environment highlights a perennial problem: illegal dumping of construction waste. In Taoyuan’s Yangmei District (楊梅) and Hsinchu’s Longtan District (龍潭) criminals leased 10,000 square meters of farmland, saying they were going to engage in horticulture. They then accepted between 40,000 and 50,000 cubic meters of construction waste from sites in northern Taiwan, charging less than the going rate for disposal, and dumped the waste concrete, tile, metal and glass onto the leased land. Taoyuan District prosecutors charged 33 individuals from seven companies with numerous violations of the law. This
Sunflower movement superstar Lin Fei-fan (林飛帆) once quipped that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) could nominate a watermelon to run for Tainan mayor and win. Conversely, the DPP could run a living saint for mayor in Taipei and still lose. In 2022, the DPP ran with the closest thing to a living saint they could find: former Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中). During the pandemic, his polling was astronomically high, with the approval of his performance reaching as high as 91 percent in one TVBS poll. He was such a phenomenon that people printed out pop-up cartoon