At his store in Tokyo’s ritzy Ginza district, Hajime Sasaki displays a disparate array of wares, from chopsticks to Buddha statues — including many made of ivory.
International trade in elephant ivory is illegal, but Japan hosts one of the world’s largest remaining legal domestic markets for the product, which can only be bought and sold within its borders.
It is fed with stockpiles of ivory imported before the international ban more than 30 years ago, or bought in one-off government auctions.
Photo: AFP
But conservationists warn Japan’s ivory often leaks overseas, fueling black market trade, while driving demand and undermining bans in countries like China.
Sasaki’s shop displays pamphlets in Chinese and English explaining that ivory cannot be taken abroad, but he still “receives many Chinese customers,” he said.
“Tourists give up buying ivory when I explain you can’t bring it outside Japan,” said the softly-spoken 69-year-old.
Photo: AFP
Conservationists estimate between 10,000 and 15,000 elephants from the two African species are killed for their tusks each year.
And seizure data suggests ivory is leaving Japan’s domestic market.
Since 2008, more than 3,600 kilograms of ivory linked to Japan has been seized by authorities around the world, according to data presented at a recent global wildlife trade meeting in Uzbekistan.
Photo: AFP
Dozens of interceptions were destined for China, according to the document presented at the meeting of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES).
The data suggests “some weakness in Japan’s law enforcement”, the document warned.
‘ORGANIZED CRIMINALS’
In 2023, a shipment reportedly bound for Thailand carrying 710 pieces was intercepted, another CITES document said.
Shipments of that size “suggest organized criminals are also involved,” said Matt Collis, senior policy director at the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW).
At the CITES meeting, four African nations unsuccessfully urged adoption of a document that would have called for the closure of all remaining domestic ivory markets.
And Japan fiercely denies that its national market impacts elephant conservation.
It disputed the interpretation of the data presented at CITES, and said it continues to “implement strict control measures” to prevent leakage.
Japan’s alleged leakage problem is particularly problematic for China, once the world’s biggest market for ivory, which banned the trade in 2017 — around the same time as the US.
“China is doing their best to enforce their domestic ivory ban and to change public perceptions,” Collis said. “But you have a neighboring country that is undermining these efforts by not enforcing controls and perpetuating demand.”
Ivory was once widely used in Japan for personal seals and musical instruments. Today the country has a 250-tonne stockpile, boosted by two CITES-approved auctions in 1999 and 2008. At Sasaki’s shop, shelves are lined with exquisitely-carved ornaments. A Buddha statue worth more than US$1,500 is safely housed inside a gold-painted cabinet.
But there is little demand.
Sasaki says he has just one or two buyers a month, mostly older Japanese. That is partly due to growing awareness of the ivory trade’s devastating impact, said Masayuki Sakamoto, director of the Japan Tiger and Elephant Fund (JTEF).
“So inventory in Japan is piling up, and demand from China and other countries persists,” he said.
‘SUSTAINABLE USE’
Although China’s ban has tamped down interest somewhat, ivory carvings, jewelry and trinkets remain highly prized in Asia’s largest economy.
“Given the size of China, even lower levels of demand can provide powerful incentives for traffickers to seek to get ivory into China’s black market,” Collis said.
Experts also question Japan’s system for tracking its domestic ivory, which is based mostly on tracing whole tusks, even though trade is primarily in small, derivative products.
Japan has shown little interest in curtailing domestic sales, and supported a proposal by Namibia at CITES that would have allowed a one-off government auction of the African country’s ivory stocks to other governments.
The bid was defeated, to the relief of conservationists who argue further sales will only fuel demand. But Sasaki said he felt the tusks should be sold to help conservation efforts, echoing the Tokyo Ivory and Crafts Association, which says it backs “sustainable use” of ivory, as a “form of conservation.”
“Smuggling is bad,” Sasaki said.
“But I think reusing elephant tusks would be better (than disposing of them), and generate income.”
The Lee (李) family migrated to Taiwan in trickles many decades ago. Born in Myanmar, they are ethnically Chinese and their first language is Yunnanese, from China’s Yunnan Province. Today, they run a cozy little restaurant in Taipei’s student stomping ground, near National Taiwan University (NTU), serving up a daily pre-selected menu that pays homage to their blended Yunnan-Burmese heritage, where lemongrass and curry leaves sit beside century egg and pickled woodear mushrooms. Wu Yun (巫雲) is more akin to a family home that has set up tables and chairs and welcomed strangers to cozy up and share a meal
Dec. 8 to Dec. 14 Chang-Lee Te-ho (張李德和) had her father’s words etched into stone as her personal motto: “Even as a woman, you should master at least one art.” She went on to excel in seven — classical poetry, lyrical poetry, calligraphy, painting, music, chess and embroidery — and was also a respected educator, charity organizer and provincial assemblywoman. Among her many monikers was “Poetry Mother” (詩媽). While her father Lee Chao-yuan’s (李昭元) phrasing reflected the social norms of the 1890s, it was relatively progressive for the time. He personally taught Chang-Lee the Chinese classics until she entered public
Last week writer Wei Lingling (魏玲靈) unloaded a remarkably conventional pro-China column in the Wall Street Journal (“From Bush’s Rebuke to Trump’s Whisper: Navigating a Geopolitical Flashpoint,” Dec 2, 2025). Wei alleged that in a phone call, US President Donald Trump advised Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi not to provoke the People’s Republic of China (PRC) over Taiwan. Wei’s claim was categorically denied by Japanese government sources. Trump’s call to Takaichi, Wei said, was just like the moment in 2003 when former US president George Bush stood next to former Chinese premier Wen Jia-bao (溫家寶) and criticized former president Chen
President William Lai (賴清德) has proposed a NT$1.25 trillion (US$40 billion) special eight-year budget that intends to bolster Taiwan’s national defense, with a “T-Dome” plan to create “an unassailable Taiwan, safeguarded by innovation and technology” as its centerpiece. This is an interesting test for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), and how they handle it will likely provide some answers as to where the party currently stands. Naturally, the Lai administration and his Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) are for it, as are the Americans. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is not. The interests and agendas of those three are clear, but