It is one of the more remarkable facts of Taiwan history that it was never occupied or claimed by any of the numerous kingdoms of southern China — Han or otherwise — that lay just across the water from it. None of their brilliant ministers ever discovered that Taiwan was a “core interest” of the state whose annexation was “inevitable.”
As Paul Kua notes in an excellent monograph laying out how the Portuguese gave Taiwan the name “Formosa,” the first Europeans to express an interest in occupying Taiwan were the Spanish. Tonio Andrade in his seminal work, How Taiwan Became Chinese, says that as early as the 1580s Spanish documents show that Spain thought of Taiwan as part of the Philippines and just as much a Spanish possession. In 1586 the governor of Manila and a council of 50 local notables sent a letter to the King of Spain advising that Formosa be occupied, Andrade notes.
SPANISH COLONIALISM
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
Kua points to the 1596 letter of Luis Perez Damsmarinas, then interim governor of Spain’s territories in the Far East, to the King of Spain warning of the importance of Isla Hermosa and advising the King to send a military expedition. A year later, Hernando Rios Coronel, who had helped lead the ill-fated Spanish invasion of Cambodia in the late 1580s, similarly memorialized the King. He argued that Spain needed ports on both the Chinese coast and on “Isla-Hermosa,” specifically identifying Keelung as a good candidate for a defensible port, and warned that the Japanese could move before Spain.
According to Andrade, this perception of Japan was widespread among the Spanish in the Philippines in the 1590s, because missionaries had brought back word of secret Japanese plans to seize Taiwan.
Today Coronel is largely remembered for drawing one of the first Spanish maps of Luzon, Taiwan and the Chinese coast, rendering Taiwan correctly as a single island (recall that until Taiwan’s rivers were dammed in modern times, they were wide and flat, making Taiwan appear to be 2-3 separate islands to early Western mariners).
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
The Spanish fear of Japanese invasion was the natural outcome of Taiwan’s geography. Viewed from Manila, Taiwan with its Austronesian peoples is obviously related to the Philippines. Whereas, viewed from Tokyo, it appears to be an obvious southward extension of the Ryukyus, which was how modern Japanese strategists came to treat it.
Indeed, the Chinese themselves recognized the latter relation, confusingly naming Taiwan “Little Ryukyu” as opposed to Okinawa, which was “Big Ryukyu.” It was only after majority Han settlement that the “inevitable” relationship between China and Taiwan became a historical possibility. Without the Dutch, we would be talking about the Austronesian brotherhood of Taiwan and the Philippines. Indeed, when the Portuguese wrecked off Taiwan in 1582, their first recorded visit, they had with them a young man from Luzon who could communicate with the local Austronesians, according to a 17th-century account of the incident.
JAPANESE INTEREST
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
Japanese interest in Taiwan was signaled in 1593 by a letter from Toyotomi Hideyoshi demanding submission and tribute. Of course, there was no centralized authority in Taiwan at the time. In 1609 Arima Harunobu, the Christian lord of Shimabara in Hizen province, sent an expedition to Taiwan but was driven off by the local Indigenous people. Another Japanese expedition in 1616 was scattered by a typhoon and ended up raiding the Chinese coast.
When the Dutch arrived in Tainan in 1624 they found Japanese and Chinese traders well established in the harbor there. In 1625 the Dutch cut off the Japanese from the silk trade. The loss of the Japanese trade inflicted a grievous budgetary blow on the Dutch colony, and the Dutch authorities considered abandoning it. The colonists on Formosa disagreed, arguing persuasively that the Spanish or the Portuguese would take over. Inevitably.
In 1635, one of the major events of Taiwan history took place, one that ended many might-have-beens: the Shogun cut Japan off from the outside world almost completely. Because this was a “non-” event, it is often overlooked, and yet it was formative.
Taiwan’s history would have been hugely different if the Dutch, Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, Koxinga) or the Manchus (Qing) had encountered a vigorous Japanese trading and state presence backed by an expansionist state policy. The People’s Republic of China’s “inevitable” annexation of Taiwan is historically plausible only because the Shogunate removed itself from the Taiwan chessboard.
SOVEREIGNTY ACHIEVED
As it was, during the period of Manchu control of western Taiwan, there were hundreds of shipwrecks of all nations, including ships from Ryukyu (Okinawa) and Japan. The 1874 invasion of southern Taiwan by Japan is often attributed to the 1871 Indigenous massacre of Okinawan sailors, an event known today as the Mudan Incident (牡丹社事件). In reality, decades of similar incidents may have helped drive the invasion, in addition to Japan’s desire to assert sovereignty over Okinawa, as Liu Shiuh-Feng (劉序楓), a historical specialist at Academia Sinica, has noted.
For example, in 1803 a ship from Hokkaido drifted into Kavalan, then just coming under Manchu administration. The local Indigenous people attacked the craft (robbery of wrecked ships and murder of seamen was common). The ship got away and wound up at the mouth of the Siuoguluan River (秀姑巒溪), where some Han merchants had established themselves. The crew of nine were taken off, but then subjected to forced labor. One by one they died, leaving only the captain.
In 1808 another Japanese ship appeared at the river mouth, and the stranded captain boarded it, heading for Fangliao. Eventually he made his way home and published an account of his adventures. He was not the only Japanese stranded for years among the Indigenous people.
Because Okinawa was controlled by Japan (it had been a vassal of Satsuma since 1609) but contested by the Manchus, the experiences of its stranded sailors became a political issue. The Japanese insisted that their Ryukyuan subjects be repatriated to Japan by the Manchus before being sent on to Okinawa, but the Manchus treated them as vassals and sent them directly to Okinawa if they went on Manchu vessels. Imagine what these policies would have looked like if Taiwan had been contested between the two imperial states and Okinawa had been a sideshow.
As history teaches, in the latter half of the 19th century, Japan developed a vigorous commercial policy that flooded northern Taiwan with Japanese products. Within a few decades of re-opening, it annexed Taiwan, making good on the letter of 1593. Imperialism delayed is not, it turns out, imperialism denied. Inevitable? Sure feels like it. Probably more so than Chinese annexation, which after centuries of contact, still remains only a possibility.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
And so, in the wake of US President Donald Trump’s trip to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), all the experts on the Strait of Hormuz suddenly became experts on US-China-Taiwan relations. The Internet has certainly expanded human knowledge. Lots of these sudden experts made noise this week about Trump’s words after the meeting with PRC dictator Xi Jin-ping (習近平). Trump is going to sell out Taiwan! Longtime Taiwan commentator J. Michael Cole summed the situation up neatly in the Guardian: “We need to keep in mind that he has a tendency to say many things — sometimes contradicting himself within
There is considerable frustration and confusion among many, both in Taiwan and abroad — including in Washington — as to why the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) seems so dead set on using their legislative leverage to slash defense spending and disrupt the ability of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration to function. Are they pawns of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)? Are they traitors? In reality, there are multiple reasons. In the first column in this series on this subject, “Donovan’s Deep Dives: How and why the TPP and KMT help Beijing” (Sat May 16, page 12), we examined three
It took 12 years and months of standing in the same mountain location for director Liang Chieh-te (梁皆得) to capture a few seconds of footage: Taiwan’s largest resident raptor locking talons with its mate and spinning through the air in a courtship ritual. With only about 1,000 left in the wild and very short flight windows, the mountain hawk-eagle remains among Taiwan’s most elusive birds. The species generally produces only one offspring per year. Using forest cameras, the film crew and research teams document the arduous process the monogamous pairs go through for the chick to hatch and grow up, weathering
May 25 to May 31 Few believed that apples could be cultivated on a commercial scale in Taiwan’s high mountains. When horticulturalist Cheng Chao-hsiung (程兆熊) first proposed the idea in 1955, both American and Taiwanese colleagues dismissed it as implausible, arguing that temperate fruit could not be reliably grown on a subtropical island, especially on rugged terrain. However, it was this terrain in the Central Mountain Range where many Chinese Civil War veterans were resettled in the late 1950s. With limited job prospects and no family in Taiwan, they were placed on cooperative farms aimed toward self-sufficiency. Some say the conditions