A TikTok tarot card reader gazes at me through the screen and draws a card.
“If you’re seeing this,” she coos, “it was meant for you.” And in a sense, she’s right. But it wasn’t fate that brought me here, it was an algorithm.
Spirituality and mysticism have long found a home online, but the rise of generative AI and personalized content recommender systems are making it easier than ever to project a sense of magic upon technology.
Photo: AP
As the Arthur C Clarke quote goes: “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.”
Anyone who has been served content that feels eerily perfect for them might have wondered at the mysterious omnipotence of The Algorithm. And while there’s nothing inherently wrong with experiencing a sense of wonder in the face of technological advancement, or even using digital technologies to enhance a spiritual practice, collapsing magic and technology can be risky.
‘ASK THE STARS’
Photo: Reuters
Off the back of OpenAI’s large language model GPT-4, many religious and spiritual spinoff chatbots have emerged. You can get BibleGPT to write personalized Christian poetry, use Jesus AI to, as the website claims, have “meaningful conversations with Jesus Christ” and chat with WitchGPT about paganism.
“Welcome to the void” beckons the popular astrology app CoStar in its own latest chatbot feature, encouraging users to seek generated guidance for a fee of about US$1 per question. Choosing from a list of suggested prompts, I “Ask the Stars” if I have a secret admirer. “No,” it tells me (rude).
In true CoStar fashion (the app is famously sassy) it also rebukes me for having asked the question at all, suggesting I should instead find gratitude in what I already have.
These examples are at best a bit silly and probably harmless. At worst, they reveal grifters out to make a buck by manufacturing a sense of insight or enlightenment by leveraging the human tendency to anthropomorphize technology or by gaming social media engagement algorithms.
But among the chaff there are also people forming genuine spiritual communities and engaging in witchcraft and other sacred traditions online. As with many subcultures, social media can be both a blessing and a curse: it can enable otherwise disparate groups to connect, but can also lead to the diminishment or adulteration of cultural practices.
Feminist anthropologist Emma Quilty, who has forthcoming books on magic and technology, makes a distinction between those that focus on the collective and those that push a “neoliberal spirituality” which aligns itself with hyper-individualistic ideas of self-improvement.
This edges uncomfortably close to commercialized forms of self-care, utterly divorced from its Black radical feminist roots and redirected towards a capitalist cooption of wellness. Quilty highlights how trends fueled by social media can also result in practices becoming detached from the (usually eastern) religious traditions and cultures they are imported from, and in some cases lead to unsustainable market demand for products such as crystals and white sage smudge sticks.
None of this is to say that it’s impossible to develop meaningful spiritual communities and practices online nor that it’s impossible to have a profound experience using digital tools.
I’m not interested in dismissing where and how people derive meaning. Yet it’s important to remember that technologies including large language models and personalized recommender systems are ultimately designed to generate value from their users.
Any profound experience from these tools comes from us — the humans — not the tool. As Quilty notes: “Something can be positive, helpful or even empowering on an individual level, but can still be harmful at a broader societal level, because of the underlying interests and imperatives of those building and implementing the technology.”
MAGIC AND TECH
Indeed we can get into treacherous waters pretty quickly when we misattribute magic to technology. It plays right into the hands of companies that would rather us be awestruck by a shiny user interface and smooth convenience and not peep behind the curtain to reveal a crotchety old man holding things together with overblown marketing language and regular old profit-driven data extraction.
When magical thinking about technology spreads to the level of policymaking, it can become dangerous. Too often governments and companies alike are quick to turn to technology as a silver-bullet solution to complex social problems. And when the real limitations and consequences of technologies are ignored — such as how automation can exacerbate social inequalities, or how
ChatGPT couldn’t function without stealing copyrighted material, or that automated content moderation relies on exploited invisible workers — we end up with policy that fails to rein in the worst of tech’s ails and relegates the more complex but necessary policy interventions to the background, all overshadowed by the magical allure of technology.
Technology isn’t a cure-all for social ills, and can, when misused for personal gain, cause great harm — just like magic.
The arithmetic is straightforward and uncomfortable. By the end of 2025, Taiwan had committed itself to a 50-30-20 electricity mix — half natural gas, 30 per cent coal, 20 per cent renewables. The Ministry of Economic Affairs’s (MOEA) own monthly energy reports tell a different story. Natural gas reached 47.8 per cent of generation last year. Coal stood at 35.4 per cent, comfortably above its target ceiling. Renewables came in at 13.1 per cent, well short of the 20 per cent Taipei had pledged a decade earlier. Installed renewable capacity reached roughly half of the 12 gigawatts (GW) the government
There are shadowy cabals plotting to sell out Taiwan to be annexed by China, by invasion if necessary. Fortunately, they are buffoons. In 2019, former Bamboo Union gangster and founder of the China Unification Promotion Party (CUPP), Chang An-le (張安樂, colorfully known as “White Wolf”), led a protest at the Legislative Yuan against comments made by then-premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) that in the event of an attack by China, he would never surrender, but would protect the nation by fighting to the end, even if he only had a broom. Chang had party members bring a wooden casket that they
Taiwan’s drone exports are taking off, fuelled by the war in Ukraine, as Taiwanese companies seek a stake in the fast-growing global market for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV). Low-cost drones used for reconnaissance and strikes are in high demand as governments around the world boost defense spending in the face of intensifying conflicts. A relative new player in the increasingly competitive industry, Taiwan’s pitch is to be an “Asian hub” for the production of UAVs and components free of Chinese materials, or “non-red.” That means its UAVs can be up to three times more expensive than their Chinese competitors, like the world’s biggest
It seems every few days one bumps into one of those “real man” comments in which Taiwan is urged to “face reality” or similar, and “make a deal,” with the speaker implying that soon it will be too late. “Deal” advocates always present themselves as having a superior grip on reality, and the manly ability to make the “hard choice.” Their testosterone-laden language often echoes that of Taiwan sellout advocates. Note that such commentary always specifies a process (“make a deal, work with, make progress”), never the end state of what occupation by a violent authoritarian colonialist state will entail. In
RSS