Award-winning filmmaker Yang Yong-hi was just six years old when she watched her eldest brother leave Japan for North Korea as one of 200 “human gifts” for leader Kim Il-sung’s 60th birthday.
As a North Korean anthem blared, through bursts of confetti, he handed her a note before his ferry departed Niigata port: “Yong-hi, listen to a lot of music. Watch as many movies as you want.”
It was 1972, a year after her parents — members of the ethnic Korean Zainichi community in Japan — had sent their other two sons the same way, lured by the Kim regime’s promise of a socialist paradise with free education, healthcare and jobs for all.
Photo: AFP
The boys never moved back.
“My parents dedicated their entire lives to an entity that came up with such a senseless project and forced them to sacrifice their own children for it,” Yang, now 57, said.
The trauma of being ripped apart from her siblings reverberates in all of Osaka-born Yang’s films, which document the suffering of her family across generations — from the end of Japanese colonial rule to decades after the split of the Korean peninsula.
Photo: AFP
Her father was a prominent pro-North Korean activist in Osaka, and had sent his sons to live there in the 1970s as part of a repatriation program organized by Pyongyang and Tokyo.
Around 93,000 Japan-based Koreans left for North Korea under the scheme between 1959 and 1984. Yang’s eldest brother was among 200 university students specially chosen to honor Kim Il-sung.
The regime’s promises came to almost nothing, but the Zainichi arrivals were forced to stay. Their families could do little to bring them back.
Yang’s parents “had no choice after having already sent their children. To keep the kids safe (in North Korea), they couldn’t leave the regime, and had to become even more devoted,” she said.
“I was so angry at the system that kept my brothers as hostages.”
Unlike her parents, Yang rebelled.
‘I WANTED TO BE FREE’
Yang said she faced discrimination in Japan — repeatedly denied jobs and fired from a film project because of her Korean heritage. She also had to grapple with the pro-North Korean sentiment in her community.
Her father was a prominent figure in the Chongryon organization — Pyongyang’s de facto embassy in Japan — which ran the university where she studied literature.
During her time at the school, when students were asked to interpret texts with leader “Kim Jong-il’s literary theories,” Yang said she once submitted a blank page.
And at home, where portraits of North Korean leaders Kim Il-sung and Kim Jong-il hung side by side, she resented her parents for sending her brothers away.
“I wanted to be free,” Yang said.
“I could have... pretended I was Japanese, and avoided being honest about my father and brothers, acting as if I don’t recognize any problems. But to really break free, I had to confront them all.”
After a failed marriage and spending some three years as a teacher at a Pyongyang-linked high school, she left for New York to study documentary filmmaking.
And it was through movies that she began to unpack the story of her family.
Her first documentary, Dear Pyongyang, was released in 2005 to critical acclaim, including at the Sundance and Berlin film festivals.
It offered a rare, independent look inside North Korea, featuring footage from Yang’s camcorder during her trips to visit her brothers.
It infuriated the Chongryon, which demanded an apology.
By then, Yang had acquired South Korean nationality, making it impossible for her to ever visit her brothers again.
“It’s a huge price, but I have no regrets. I at least stayed true to my own desire — to make a movie, and to tell a story about my own family,” Yang explained.
DESPERATE FOR A HOMELAND
Yang’s latest step in that quest is the film Soup and Ideology, set for a theatrical release this year.
It focuses on her mother Kang Jung-hee, who fiercely loves her children but is also deeply loyal to Pyongyang.
For 45 years, she sent food, money and other goods to her sons in Pyongyang, including Seiko watches to be exchanged for cash.
Yang said her mother was often “unnaturally and overly cheerful,” telling people that her sons are doing well in Pyongyang “thanks to the North Korean leaders. But at home, she would cry alone,” the director said, especially after Kang’s eldest son was diagnosed with bipolar disorder.
Yang said her mother would send any medicine for the disease she could afford from Japan to North Korea, without knowing what he might need.
He died in 2009.
In her old age, she told Yang of yet another traumatic event — a bloody crackdown by South Korean forces on Jeju Island in 1947-54 to crush an uprising.
As many as 30,000 people were killed, according to the National Archives of Korea.
They included Kang’s fiancee and relatives.
“My mother is someone who desperately wanted a homeland. She wanted to belong to Jeju but she was forced to leave. She didn’t see her place in Japan,” Yang said. “She was looking for a government that she could trust, and she believed in North Korea.”
That is where Yang’s two surviving brothers remain.
Despite the struggles facing her, Yang said she still wanted to speak out.
“Since I was young, I was constantly told: ‘don’t say this, don’t say that, always say this’,” she said.
“I realized I wanted to do it whatever the price.”
Taiwan’s English education system is being pulled apart by three opposing forces. Bilingual Nation 2030 pulls students toward English and global communication. Artificial Intelligence (AI) readiness pulls them toward digital judgment, verification and AI-mediated work. But Taiwan’s old exam culture pulls them back toward memorization, grammar drills, timed reading and correct answers. If the education system keeps using old exams to define success, it risks producing graduates who are neither genuinely bilingual nor genuinely AI-ready, but trained for tasks machines can already perform. The first force is Bilingual Nation 2030. Launched in 2018, the policy aimed to “help Taiwan’s workforce connect
It seems every few days one bumps into one of those “real man” comments in which Taiwan is urged to “face reality” or similar, and “make a deal,” with the speaker implying that soon it will be too late. “Deal” advocates always present themselves as having a superior grip on reality, and the manly ability to make the “hard choice.” Their testosterone-laden language often echoes that of Taiwan sellout advocates. Note that such commentary always specifies a process (“make a deal, work with, make progress”), never the end state of what occupation by a violent authoritarian colonialist state will entail. In
There are shadowy cabals plotting to sell out Taiwan to be annexed by China, by invasion if necessary. Fortunately, they are buffoons. In 2019, former Bamboo Union gangster and founder of the China Unification Promotion Party (CUPP), Chang An-le (張安樂, colorfully known as “White Wolf”), led a protest at the Legislative Yuan against comments made by then-premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) that in the event of an attack by China, he would never surrender, but would protect the nation by fighting to the end, even if he only had a broom. Chang had party members bring a wooden casket that they
June 1 to June 7 "If all Taiwanese were as afraid of dying as you, then what would happen?” Physician Shih Chiang-nan (施江南) reportedly said this to his wife Chen Chiao-tung (陳焦桐) after she urged him to stop intervening on behalf of Taiwanese soldiers stranded overseas after serving in the Japanese Army during World War II. Shih had clashed with high-ranking officials over the issue, engaged in several heated arguments with Taiwan governor-general Chen Yi (陳儀) and allegedly shouted at general Ko Yuan-fen (柯遠芬), chief of staff of the Taiwan Garrison Command, over