British-American John Oliver roasted Chinese leader Xi Jinping (習近平) in 2018 and slammed China’s treatment of Uighurs in Xinjiang last year. Now some want him to do a segment on Taiwan.
More than 500 people have signed a petition launched last week asking Oliver to discuss Taiwan’s complex political situation and its international significance on his HBO show Last Week Tonight.
Jenna Cody, an American teacher-trainer and prolific blogger who has lived in Taiwan for 15 years, says she created the petition during a night of insomnia. Cody’s blog is quick to dispel one-sided or misinformed Western reports of the country, but she says the issue remains widely misunderstood.
Screen grab: Han Cheung, Taipei Times
“For a lot of us who write about Taiwan, I feel that our audience is just people who care about Taiwan,” Cody says. “It doesn’t feel like we’re getting any sort of general viewership. Taiwan makes it into the mainstream media, but it’s always through the China lens.”
Along with items such as unlimited term limits and detained activists, Oliver panned Chinese media censorship during his segment on Xi (where he also joked about comparisons with Winnie the Pooh). As expected, China reacted by blocking HBO and erasing Oliver from microblogging Web site Sina Weibo.
“Of all the late night comedy news shows, I feel that [Oliver] is probably the best person to take this on,” Cody says. “He’s willing to criticize China … a lot of those news guys don’t do that. He also tends to do in-depth things and I think Taiwan really needs an in-depth look. So I was up late and I thought, ‘Why don’t I pull a stunt and see if I can get something to happen?’”
Photo: screen grab from HBO’s Last week Tonight With John Oliver
Oliver typically spends 20 to 30 minutes doing a deep dive on a single topic in a sharply critical yet informative and humorous manner.
“He’s able to break down very serious issues in a way that keeps people’s attention,” Cody says. “His brand of humor can take something that people don’t think about or find boring … and make them realize that it is in fact very important.”
There are many angles to approach the Taiwan issue from, but Cody says that from her experience, foreign understanding of Taiwan is still low, and a general overview is needed.
“My grandma once asked me why I live here since it’s not a democracy,” she says. “So just letting people know that Taiwan is in fact independent and doesn’t want to be part of China is enough. A lot of people think because Taiwan calls itself the ROC [Republic of China], they assume Taiwanese think they are Chinese. It’s a lot of work on my part to quash that every time it comes up.”
Cody says that when she criticizes China in Taiwan, it’s usually apparent that she’s talking about the Chinese Communist Party. But in the US, people seem to project negative commentary onto the entire country, which has fueled anti-Asian sentiment across the nation.
Oliver has spoken out about racism in the past. In March, he railed against former US president Donald Trump and other politicians for calling COVID-19 the “China virus,” stating that doing so has led to an increase in violence against people of Asian descent. And two weeks ago he did a 27-minute, detailed segment on Asian Americans to contextualize their layered history and the model minority myth in light of current events.
“Looking at what he’s done recently, I think he would be able to handle the issue sensitively as well as correctly,” Cody says.
Cody adds that instead of just complaining about the vaccine situation, foreigners in Taiwan can help the situation by doing more outreach to people back home
“While not perfect, this is a country worth knowing about and fighting for,” she says. “You can do PR stunts, you can write your opinions, or just talk to your friends.”
The small platform at Duoliang Train Station in Taitung County’s Taimali Township (太麻里) served villagers from 1992 to 2006, but was eventually shut down due to lack of use. Just 10 years later, the abandoned train station had become widely known as the most beautiful station in Taiwan, and visitors were so frequent that the village had to start restricting traffic. Nowadays, Duoliang Village (多良) is known as a bit of a tourist trap, with a mandatory, albeit modest, admission fee of NT$10 giving access to a crowded lane of vendors with a mediocre view of the ocean and the trains
For many people, Bilingual Nation 2030 begins and ends in the classroom. Since the policy was launched in 2018, the debate has centered on students, teachers and the pressure placed on schools. Yet the policy was never solely about English education. The government’s official plan also calls for bilingualization in Taiwan’s government services, laws and regulations, and living environment. The goal is to make Taiwan more inclusive and accessible to international enterprises and talent and better prepared for global economic and trade conditions. After eight years, that grand vision is due for a pulse check. RULES THAT CAN BE READ For Harper Chen (陳虹宇), an adviser
Traditionally, indigenous people in Taiwan’s mountains practice swidden cultivation, or “slash and burn” agriculture, a practice common in human history. According to a 2016 research article in the International Journal of Environmental Sustainability, among the Atayal people, this began with a search for suitable forested slopeland. The trees are burnt for fertilizer and the land cleared of stones. The stones and wood are then piled up to make fences, while both dead and standing trees are retained on the plot. The fences are used to grow climbing crops like squash and beans. The plot itself supports farming for three years.
President William Lai (賴清德) on Nov. 25 last year announced in a Washington Post op-ed that “my government will introduce a historic US$40 billion supplementary defense budget, an investment that underscores our commitment to defending Taiwan’s democracy.” Lai promised “significant new arms acquisitions from the United States” and to “invest in cutting-edge technologies and expand Taiwan’s defense industrial base,” to “bolster deterrence by inserting greater costs and uncertainties into Beijing’s decision-making on the use of force.” Announcing it in the Washington Post was a strategic gamble, both geopolitically and domestically, with Taiwan’s international credibility at stake. But Lai’s message was exactly