Ink painting exhibitions have become an annual tradition at the Taipei Fine Arts Museum. The 2006 show Ink Transformation: Modern Ink Painting in Taiwan (水墨變相:現代水墨在台灣) examined the development of ink painting in Taiwan since the 1950s, while 2004’s Contemporary Ink Painting and the State of the Ink (當代水墨與水墨當代) took the 1980s as its starting point.
Last year’s Form, Ideas, Essence, Rhythm: Contemporary East Asian Ink Painting (形•意•質•韻 ─ 東亞當代水墨創作邀請展) displayed the work of artists from Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and China as a means of dispelling the popular notion that ink painting is a hidebound art form.
Open Flexibility: Innovative Contemporary Ink Art (開顯與時變－創新水墨藝術展), which is currently on display on the museum’s third floor, explores the evolution of ink painting in Taiwan since the 1960s and China since the 1980s.
Curator Liu Yung-jen (劉永仁) has assembled 80 works by 27 artists — 15 from Taiwan, 12 from China — as a means of tracing the revolutionary changes in ink painting that occurred in both countries. He dubs the new style “modern” in the Taiwanese context, but “experimental” when it comes to China’s ink painting endeavors.
“The professional terms used are different but the concepts are the same. It’s just that Taiwan developed ink painting in a different direction 20 years earlier than China,” Liu said, adding that China’s art fell under the influence of Taiwan’s earlier innovators.
Orthodox ink painting techniques developed over centuries had previously dominated the genre. For the past several hundred years, the literary themes such styles depicted as well as adherence to technical form determined the pedigree of the work. Artists were expected to hold the brush in a certain manner and apply paint to rice paper in a particular fashion.
This dogmatic conception of the genre began to lose steam at the end of the 1950s, when Taiwan’s ink painters broke with tradition and came under the influence of surrealism, abstract expressionism and pop art. The examples exhibited in Open Flexibility demonstrate that modernist experimentation freed Taiwanese artists from the formal constraints of the past and enabled them to employ ink in a revolutionary manner. When China opened up in the early 1980s, ink painters across the country followed in the innovative footsteps of their Taiwanese counterparts.
Liu masterfully sets the stage with three works by Taiwanese painter and art theorist Liu Kuo-sung (劉國松). Interaction (互動), a 1964 painting by Liu, portrays non-representational forms through the use of expressive brush strokes on homemade rice paper.
Yuan Chin-ta (袁金塔) employs the visual language of pop art to chronicle Taiwan’s folk culture and temple scenes, as well as other mainstays of local identity. In his 2008 collage Reading Beauty (書中自有顏如玉), he satirizes the decline of moral standards through the repetitive depiction of naked women.
Chinese ink painter Liu Zijian (劉子建), an experimentalist working in the early 1980s, breaks many, if not all, of the technical rules of traditional ink painting. He smudges, rubs and dabs the ink, creating distinct black and white forms that collide on the paper’s surface.
In Untitled (無題), Liu Yong (劉庸) freely splashes, drizzles and smears colored ink on his paintings, while Wang Chuan’s (王川) lyrical Static Sensation I (塵世之一) contains flowing lines reminiscent of Jackson Pollock’s expressionist drippings.
In their quest for new forms, some artists have even gone so far as to do away with ink. Using a lit cigarette, Chinese artist Wang Tiande (王天德) burns characters onto thin rice paper, which he then curtains over abstract paintings.
Others work without brushes. In Zhang Yu’s (張羽) Fingerprint series, the artist dipped his finger in spring water lightly saturated with colored ink and randomly pressed it on rice paper, creating dynamic visual tension.
The juxtaposition of Chinese experimental ventures and Taiwanese modernist undertakings illustrates the flexibility of ink painting, which is able to depict the multiplicity of contemporary society while remaining somewhat grounded in tradition. The exhibit’s subtext, of course, makes it perfectly clear that Chinese innovative ink painters lagged 20 years behind their Taiwanese counterparts because of China’s tumultuous
recent history.
Although the exhibition’s catalogue fully explains the remarkable aesthetic transitions taking place in both Taiwan and China, the exhibit fails to help those without a guide understand why the featured ink painters were cutting edge. Viewers raised on a bevy of modern and contemporary art will probably view the works and question the level of innovation present in the paintings. Had the museum provided visitors with a brief explanation of the ink painting tradition — even a traditional painting or two would suffice to elucidate the contrast — even those unversed in the art form would be better equipped to evaluate the truly revolutionary nature of the pieces on display.
Taiwan has next to no political engagement in Myanmar, either with the ruling military junta nor the dozens of armed groups who’ve in the last five years taken over around two-thirds of the nation’s territory in a sprawling, patchwork civil war. But early last month, the leader of one relatively minor Burmese revolutionary faction, General Nerdah Bomya, who is also an alleged war criminal, made a low key visit to Taipei, where he met with a member of President William Lai’s (賴清德) staff, a retired Taiwanese military official and several academics. “I feel like Taiwan is a good example of
March 2 to March 8 Gunfire rang out along the shore of the frontline island of Lieyu (烈嶼) on a foggy afternoon on March 7, 1987. By the time it was over, about 20 unarmed Vietnamese refugees — men, women, elderly and children — were dead. They were hastily buried, followed by decades of silence. Months later, opposition politicians and journalists tried to uncover what had happened, but conflicting accounts only deepened the confusion. One version suggested that government troops had mistakenly killed their own operatives attempting to return home from Vietnam. The military maintained that the
“M yeolgong jajangmyeon (anti-communism zhajiangmian, 滅共炸醬麵), let’s all shout together — myeolgong!” a chef at a Chinese restaurant in Dongtan, located about 35km south of Seoul, South Korea, calls out before serving a bowl of Korean-style zhajiangmian —black bean noodles. Diners repeat the phrase before tucking in. This political-themed restaurant, named Myeolgong Banjeom (滅共飯館, “anti-communism restaurant”), is operated by a single person and does not take reservations; therefore long queues form regularly outside, and most customers appear sympathetic to its political theme. Photos of conservative public figures hang on the walls, alongside political slogans and poems written in Chinese characters; South
Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) announced last week a city policy to get businesses to reduce working hours to seven hours per day for employees with children 12 and under at home. The city promised to subsidize 80 percent of the employees’ wage loss. Taipei can do this, since the Celestial Dragon Kingdom (天龍國), as it is sardonically known to the denizens of Taiwan’s less fortunate regions, has an outsize grip on the government budget. Like most subsidies, this will likely have little effect on Taiwan’s catastrophic birth rates, though it may be a relief to the shrinking number of
RSS