The primaries for this year’s nine-in-one local elections in November began early in this election cycle, starting last autumn. The local press has been full of tales of intrigue, betrayal, infighting and drama going back to the summer of 2024.
This is not widely covered in the English-language press, and the nine-in-one elections are not well understood.
The nine-in-one elections refer to the nine levels of local governments that go to the ballot, from the neighborhood and village borough chief level on up to the city mayor and county commissioner level.
Photo: Lo Kuo-chia, Taipei Times
The main focus is on the 22 special municipality mayors and county commissioners, but the two are different. Below the county level there are city and township mayoral elections. For example, under Changhua County, there are elections for Changhua City mayor and city councillors, but above those are the elections for county commissioner and county councillors taking place simultaneously.
In the “big six” special municipalities, all those sublevel cities and townships have been reorganized into districts, with their leaders appointed by the city mayor. Previously, cities like Banciao, Fengyuan and Fengshan had their own elections, but since 2011, they no longer do. These “big six” mayors are more powerful and lead the six biggest local governments by population, which are (in order of population), New Taipei City, Taichung City, Kaohsiung City, Taipei City (yes, it is only fourth), Taoyuan and Tainan. They also have bigger budgets.
City and county councils are important, but outside of Taipei, only colorful individuals get much press coverage. There is very little analysis done on these races because — like the legislature was prior to 2008 — these are multi-member districts. This makes predicting the outcomes extremely difficult because often the difference between the councillors who barely scrape by enough votes to win and those who do not is tiny.
Photo: TT file photo
PARTY BUILDING
One upside of this is that it is at the councillor level that small parties can win, and sometimes hold out locally when the party has collapsed on the national level. There are still councillors from the New Party, People’s First Party, the Non-partisan Solidarity Union and New Power Party (NPP), years or even decades after they lost national representation.
A key goal for up-and-coming parties, like the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), is to secure at least three seats in these councils so they can form a caucus. This allows them more representation on committees and the ability to propose legislation.
Photo: Liao Yao-tung, Taipei Times
In this election, the TPP has set a goal of winning enough seats to form caucuses in every one of the 22 city and county councils. This is unlikely; in 2022, they only won enough seats to form a single caucus — in Taipei City — but there is a good chance they could form more after this year’s elections.
It is often unappreciated how critical this can be for a new party. It is at this level that party talent is cultivated and can be groomed for future higher office. Growing numbers of council seats also indicates that momentum is on the side of the party, which is important for both internal morale and public perception. The formerly up-and-coming NPP has lost so much momentum they are resorting to advertising on online job banks for candidates.
With long historical roots and extensive experience cultivating local talent, the KMT dominates at the local level. They usually win — often with the support of allied independents — council speakerships in cities and counties that are considered the domain of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Following the 2022 elections, 16 speakerships were won by the KMT, and only four by the DPP (they won one in 2018 and two in 2014).
In 2022, the DPP improved its councilor tally to 277, picking up 39 seats despite a landslide loss at the mayor/commissioner level. The KMT lost 27 seats, but still held 367. However, that understates the KMT’s full strength — independents traditionally are more likely to ally with the KMT.
To illustrate how hard third parties struggle, the TPP only managed to win 14 of 910 available seats despite polling suggesting public support for the party as high as 20 percent. They simply lacked candidates.
The TPP is well aware of this shortcoming and have been actively recruiting, but the tricky part is that without an existing pipeline and ability to cultivate and train their own people like the big parties do, they often have to rely on blank slate candidates lacking name recognition.
These candidates can be unreliable, erratic, or sometimes outright liabilities. Of the hundreds of candidates the big parties can field, most are known quantities within their parties, and only a handful turn out to be big mistakes. Third parties rely on unknown people showing up on their doorstep, often rejected by other parties, and with checkered pasts and dubious motivations.
MESSAGES FROM VOTERS
Often these elections are compared to American mid-term elections, which are held at the mid-point of the American president’s term and elect representatives to the House of Representatives and some Senate seats. Because those are national elections, often they reflect the mood of the public and serve as something resembling a referendum on the president’s administration.
Comparing Taiwan’s local elections to the American midterms is at best inelegant, at worst misleading. Sometimes the analogy works; the 2014 elections did reflect a political backlash against then-President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) won in a landslide at the city mayor and county commissioner level.
Yet what should one make of the 2018 local elections that saw the KMT win in a landslide, but was bracketed between two landslide DPP victories in 2016 and 2020 at the national level?
In the last few election cycles a pattern emerged of the DPP winning nationally, but the KMT locally. Partially, this is due to the KMT’s traditional strength at the local level.
It also does appear to be, like the midterms, a message to the ruling DPP from voters that national victories do not necessarily mean voters like them, and especially do not want to see them have a monopoly on power.
There is a widespread perception that KMT politicians are better at cutting through bureaucracy and getting things done, though it comes with risks of corruption. The perception of the DPP is they are more idealistic, but easily distracted and bogged down in procedural issues and lack strong leadership abilities. These are crude generalizations with many exceptions, but there is a grain to truth to them.
Voters often reward the KMT for their can-do capabilities at the local level, and often, KMT leaders deliver. For example, here in Taichung, Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) is widely popular for delivering improvements while maintaining fiscal discipline. Imagine my surprise when the lanes in my unfashionable neighborhood were recently freshly paved, and it was not even an election year.
Nationally, the DPP did well in the last three national elections. Much of the electorate trusts the DPP to defend Taiwan’s sovereignty, both in foreign affairs and in relations with China. This matters at the national level, but is far less relevant at the local level.
The DPP’s loss of the legislative majority in 2024 and trouncing in last year’s recall elections may dampen the desire by swing voters to counterbalance the weakened DPP’s national strength with local KMT dominance. Or, alternatively, 10 years of DPP rule may encourage them to double down on delivering them another trouncing, keeping the status quo of the last few election cycles. Another possibility is no message at all, and voters pick candidates on local issues with mixed results.
We shall see.
Donovan’s Deep Dives is a regular column by Courtney Donovan Smith (石東文) who writes in-depth analysis on everything about Taiwan’s political scene and geopolitics. Donovan is also the central Taiwan correspondent at ICRT FM100 Radio News, co-publisher of Compass Magazine, co-founder Taiwan Report (report.tw) and former chair of the Taichung American Chamber of Commerce. Follow him on X: @donovan_smith.
By global standards, the traffic congestion that afflicts Taiwan’s urban areas isn’t horrific. But nor is it something the country can be proud of. According to TomTom, a Dutch developer of location and navigation technologies, last year Taiwan was the sixth most congested country in Asia. Of the 492 towns and cities included in its rankings last year, Taipei was the 74th most congested. Taoyuan ranked 105th, while Hsinchu County (121st), Taichung (142nd), Tainan (173rd), New Taipei City (227th), Kaohsiung (241st) and Keelung (302nd) also featured on the list. Four Japanese cities have slower traffic than Taipei. (Seoul, which has some
Michael slides a sequin glove over the pop star’s tarnished legacy, shrouding Michael Jackson’s complications with a conventional biopic that, if you cover your ears, sounds great. Antoine Fuqua’s movie is sanctioned by Jackson’s estate and its producers include the estate’s executors. So it is, by its nature, a narrow, authorized perspective on Jackson. The film ends before the flood of allegations of sexual abuse of children, or Jackson’s own acknowledgment of sleeping alongside kids. Jackson and his estate have long maintained his innocence. In his only criminal trial, in 2005, Jackson was acquitted. Michael doesn’t even subtly nod to these facts.
Writing of the finds at the ancient iron-working site of Shihsanhang (十 三行) in New Taipei City’s Bali District (八里), archaeologist Tsang Cheng-hwa (臧振華) of the Academia Sinica’s Institute of History and Philology observes: “One bronze bowl gilded with gold, together with copper coins and fragments of Tang and Song ceramics, were also found. These provide evidence for early contact between Taiwan aborigines and Chinese.” The Shihsanhang Web site from the Ministry of Culture says of the finds: “They were evidence that the residents of the area had a close trading relation with Chinese civilians, as the coins can be
During her 2015 trip to Taiwan, Sophia J. Chang (張詠慧) got fewer answers than she’d hoped for, but more revelations than she could have imagined. “That was the year I last saw my grandmother. She was in hospice care in Tainan, and it was painful to see her in bed, barely able to open her eyes,” says Los Angeles-born Chang. “The grandma I’d known, a fantastic cook and incredibly kind, was already gone.” After their visit, Chang and her grandfather went back to his apartment. There she asked him how he’d met her grandmother. “He hesitated, then started talking a bit.
RSS