After a whole afternoon playing No-Limit Texas Hold 'Em poker, this was the moment that Donny Campbell had been waiting for.
Hunched over a poker table in a back room here at Caesars Palace, Campbell, 29, looked down at his cards to see a pair of queens. One of his two opponents had bet US$300 in chips, and the other US$600, and now the bet had come around to him.
Campbell stared into the distance, as if to bore a hole through the wall with his eyes. He paused. Then he looked at his cards again.
"I re-raise," he said, pushing US$1,200 in chips to the center of the table.
This rattled the others. The first opponent folded his cards quietly. The second, sighing, did the same.
But before Campbell could celebrate his victory, Mark Seif, a prize-winning poker player who was dealing the hand, interjected a stern dose of advice.
"That just worked out, but that re-raise might have been risky considering which cards could have beaten you," Seif said. "Position is important, but just because you're last to act doesn't always mean you need to be the aggressor."
Campbell, of Tampa, Florida, smiled with gratitude. Under normal circumstances, he might have been embarrassed after making such a strategic gaffe in the presence of greatness. On this day, however, Seif's evaluation was exactly what Campbell had paid for as a student at the World Series of Poker Academy.
The academy, run by the World Series of Poker and held in different cities throughout the year, is essentially a two- or three-day poker sleepaway camp - a chance for up to 200 amateur players to improve their games with advice from the pros. The World Poker Tour Boot Camp, affiliated with the World Poker Tour, is organized much the same way, and offers similar opportunities for smaller groups - up to 60 players at a time.
As more people take up poker as a hobby, the two camps are hot commodities. Combined, the schools have offered nearly 40 camps since January, and nearly every one of them has been sold out.
Tuition for these experiences isn't cheap, generally ranging from US$1,695 to US$4,300. But Jeffrey Pollack, commissioner of the World Series of Poker, says that for people who are serious enough about poker to take a class, the money is a stake in the future.
For those players thinking about playing in events where the buy-in, or cost of entry, is US$5,000 or US$10,000, Pollack said that "a couple thousand [US] dollars for valuable instruction is almost like an insurance policy," noting that both schools offer classes in a variety of poker games.
"The truth is that we can't set these things up fast enough," he said.
For some poker fanatics, returns on their investments are subtle: a new strategy for hiding the starting hand of ace-king, or a new approach to semi-bluffing, which is a bet or raise on a straight or flush draw.
But for other amateurs, the experience has been soon followed by major winnings.
Consider Bill Spadea of Easton, Massachusetts, who paid US$3,000 for a seat at a World Poker Tour camp. Days later, he won US$429,114 for finishing 13th at the World Series of Poker Main Event, which cost US$10,000 to enter.
Then there was Lee Childs, who said he paid US$1,500 for a different World Poker Tour camp and bagged US$705,229 at the Main Event for finishing seventh. Childs, who lives in Reston, Virginia, said that he bought a seat at the boot camp only to "brush up" on some fundamentals.
"I'd say it was money well spent," Childs said of the tuition. "I knew how to play poker going in, but hearing these professionals teach discipline got me out of a bunch of hands in the tournament that I probably would have played if I hadn't just been reminded to stay away from them."
The curriculums at the schools are similar. Every day starts with a keynote speaker - a poker professional, in most cases, but sometimes an expert on statistics or gambling strategy.
At the World Series of Poker Academy in July, Joe Navarro, a former special agent for the Federal Bureau of Investigation, spoke about reading body language. (One of Navarro's classic tips: When a player has a good hand, he usually looks down at his chips.)
Around lunchtime, students at both schools hit the tables for live demonstrations. These sessions are just like cash action in a poker room, except that the dealers at each table are professional poker players - like Seif, Greg Raymer, Linda Johnson, Clonie Gowan, Scott Fischman and others.
The pros serve as instructors and ask students to play hands the way they would in a regular game. Instead of having students surrender (or "muck") hands when they fold, however, the pros ask the players to move their cards to the edge of the table until the hand is done.
Finally, when someone wins, all the students show their cards, and the professionals deconstruct the hands, asking each student to explain his or her decision-making. They also review how body language unintentionally reflected strategy to opponents. Then the instructors offer their opinions - however critical they might be.
After a catered dinner, each day concludes with a tournament in which students put their new skills to the test. Prizes vary by school, but usually involve a free seat to a future tournament. In some cases, the cash value of these seats exceeds US$5,000.
Of course, success at poker schools doesn't automatically translate into success in live games. Steve Berman, vice president of the World Poker Tour Boot Camp, said that in poker, as in other sports, practice makes perfect.
Seven hundred job applications. One interview. Marco Mascaro arrived in Taiwan last year with a PhD in engineering physics and years of experience at a European research center. He thought his Gold Card would guarantee him a foothold in Taiwan’s job market. “It’s marketed as if Taiwan really needs you,” the 33-year-old Italian says. “The reality is that companies here don’t really need us.” The Employment Gold Card was designed to fix Taiwan’s labor shortage by offering foreign professionals a combined resident visa and open work permit valid for three years. But for many, like Mascaro, the welcome mat ends at the door. A
If China attacks, will Taiwanese be willing to fight? Analysts of certain types obsess over questions like this, especially military analysts and those with an ax to grind as to whether Taiwan is worth defending, or should be cut loose to appease Beijing. Fellow columnist Michael Turton in “Notes from Central Taiwan: Willing to fight for the homeland” (Nov. 6, page 12) provides a superb analysis of this topic, how it is used and manipulated to political ends and what the underlying data shows. The problem is that most analysis is centered around polling data, which as Turton observes, “many of these
Since Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) was elected Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chair on Oct. 18, she has become a polarizing figure. Her supporters see her as a firebrand critic of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while others, including some in her own party, have charged that she is Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) preferred candidate and that her election was possibly supported by the Chinese Communist Party’s (CPP) unit for political warfare and international influence, the “united front.” Indeed, Xi quickly congratulated Cheng upon her election. The 55-year-old former lawmaker and ex-talk show host, who was sworn in on Nov.
Even the most casual followers of Taiwan politics are familiar with the terms pan-blue and pan-green. The terms are used so casually and commonly with the assumption that everyone knows what they mean, that few stop to really question it. The way these terms are used today is far broader and extensive than what they were originally created to represent. Are these still useful shorthand terms, or have people become so obsessed with them that they color perceptions to the point of distortion? LEE TUNG-HUI WAS NO SMURF People often assume that these terms have been around forever, or at least as
RSS