An Israeli invasion of southern Lebanon, bombings in Beirut, massive displacement and rising sectarian friction — the year is 2026, but for those who lived through Lebanon’s civil war five decades ago, it might as well be the 1970s.
Lebanese who fought in the 1975 to 1990 war, or documented it as journalists, said they feel echoes of the intercommunal tensions and violence they witnessed then, and see a risk of renewed fighting among Lebanese.
The latest war that erupted on March 2 between Israel and Lebanese armed group Hezbollah has deepened enmity between the Iran-backed group and its domestic opponents, pushing Lebanon’s fragile state and society toward breaking point. A short-term ceasefire is meant to allow for peace negotiations between Lebanon and Israel, with the US hosting a second round of talks on Thursday. However, it is also sharpening the divide between the government and Hezbollah, which is firmly opposed to such negotiations.
Lebanon’s civil war erupted in April 1975 when sectarian and economic tensions boiled over into clashes between Christian gunmen and Palestinian fighters, then expanded to draw in other communities and countries.
About a million people fled their homes — a figure the most recent conflict has already surpassed with 1.2 million displaced. Beirut became a battleground. Israel invaded in 1978, occupying a strip of southern Lebanon similar to the territory it has just reoccupied. From 1976 to 2005 Syria deployed troops to Lebanon — an idea that was floated to Damascus last year.
Ziad Saab, 68, squinted as he read a handwritten letter he received in 1981 from a friend on the frontline, detailing Israeli bombardment on some of the same southern villages Israel recently struck.
“This letter could be written today,” said Saab, who fought alongside Lebanon’s Communist Party at the time and now heads Fighters for Peace, an organization founded by former combatants.
Internal divisions underpinning Lebanon’s civil war were never reconciled, he said, warning Lebanese against turning on each other.
“Don’t repeat our experience. Because you’ll be surprised where it will take you,” Saab said, adding: “We ripped the country apart.”
For Saab, the bombardments of April 8, when rapid Israel strikes across Lebanon killed more than 300 people, “basically brought back the scenes of the whole civil war in seconds.”
Hezbollah was founded in 1982 at the civil war’s peak and was the only group to retain arms after it ended. After Israel withdrew in 2000, Hezbollah expanded its arsenal and deepened its sway over Lebanon’s government. Internal clashes broke out in 2008 and 2021.
However, after a 2024 war with Israel badly weakened Hezbollah, a new Lebanese government backed by the US vowed to disarm it. Lebanese troops began to confiscate its arms gradually, fearing a confrontation if they seized Hezbollah’s arsenal by force.
When Hezbollah fired into Israel on March 2 in support of Iran, some Lebanese blamed it for pulling the country into a new conflict. Some also blamed the wider Shiite community, from which Hezbollah draws its popular support. Meanwhile, Shiite Muslims, who have borne the brunt of wars with Israel and see Hezbollah as their only defense, have criticized the state for failing to protect them. Several Shiites displaced by Israeli strikes said they saw Lebanon’s top officials as “traitors.”
Patrick Baz, a Lebanese photographer, said divisions among Lebanese youth made a new internal conflict possible, citing scenes of armed Christian men, angry at Hezbollah over the war, firing in the air during a funeral of a Christian politician killed in an Israeli strike this month. Baz, who learned the craft in the civil war’s early days and spent his adulthood documenting it, pointed to universities, often a microcosm of broader political tensions.
“I’m sure if you go to universities today and you tell them to carry guns and go and fire at your political opponents or someone you don’t like, they will do it,” he said.
Last week’s temporary ceasefire announcement brought welcome respite after more than five weeks of Israeli strikes that killed nearly 2,300 people.
Yet the deal leaves key issues unaddressed. It neither requires Israeli troops to withdraw from Lebanon nor explicitly demands Hezbollah’s disarmament. It sets Beirut on track for peace talks with Israel, fiercely opposed by some Lebanese across sectarian divides.
A diplomat working on Lebanon described the text as a “detailed recipe for internal confrontation.”
Rafic Bazerji, a senior figure in a Lebanese Christian armed group during the civil war, said deals that do not have “a good foundation” are doomed to reignite tensions, citing the Taif Agreement which ended the civil war, but was never fully implemented, and the government’s unfinished plan to disarm Hezbollah.
Bazerji owns a guesthouse in the mountains southeast of Beirut and heads the Latin League in Lebanon, which represents Latin Christians, one of the country’s many religious groups.
He taught his two adult sons to shoot and sees a young generation that could take up arms.
“As much as we were, in our days, fanatics and we were excited to fight, I’m seeing today a new generation that is scary. We’re kids compared to them,” he said.
Lebanese were worried about reliving the 1975 to 1990 war, where about 150,000 were killed, he added, but splits over Hezbollah, Israel and other key issues could tip into violence.
“In the end, if we can avoid it, we avoid it. But if the razor reaches our throats, we’re also not going to take it lying down,” Bazerji said.
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly widespread in workplaces, some people stand to benefit from the technology while others face lower wages and fewer job opportunities. However, from a longer-term perspective, as AI is applied more extensively to business operations, the personnel issue is not just about changes in job opportunities, but also about a structural mismatch between skills and demand. This is precisely the most pressing issue in the current labor market. Tai Wei-chun (戴偉峻), director-general of the Institute of Artificial Intelligence Innovation at the Institute for Information Industry, said in a recent interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times