An Israeli invasion of southern Lebanon, bombings in Beirut, massive displacement and rising sectarian friction — the year is 2026, but for those who lived through Lebanon’s civil war five decades ago, it might as well be the 1970s.
Lebanese who fought in the 1975 to 1990 war, or documented it as journalists, said they feel echoes of the intercommunal tensions and violence they witnessed then, and see a risk of renewed fighting among Lebanese.
The latest war that erupted on March 2 between Israel and Lebanese armed group Hezbollah has deepened enmity between the Iran-backed group and its domestic opponents, pushing Lebanon’s fragile state and society toward breaking point. A short-term ceasefire is meant to allow for peace negotiations between Lebanon and Israel, with the US hosting a second round of talks on Thursday. However, it is also sharpening the divide between the government and Hezbollah, which is firmly opposed to such negotiations.
Lebanon’s civil war erupted in April 1975 when sectarian and economic tensions boiled over into clashes between Christian gunmen and Palestinian fighters, then expanded to draw in other communities and countries.
About a million people fled their homes — a figure the most recent conflict has already surpassed with 1.2 million displaced. Beirut became a battleground. Israel invaded in 1978, occupying a strip of southern Lebanon similar to the territory it has just reoccupied. From 1976 to 2005 Syria deployed troops to Lebanon — an idea that was floated to Damascus last year.
Ziad Saab, 68, squinted as he read a handwritten letter he received in 1981 from a friend on the frontline, detailing Israeli bombardment on some of the same southern villages Israel recently struck.
“This letter could be written today,” said Saab, who fought alongside Lebanon’s Communist Party at the time and now heads Fighters for Peace, an organization founded by former combatants.
Internal divisions underpinning Lebanon’s civil war were never reconciled, he said, warning Lebanese against turning on each other.
“Don’t repeat our experience. Because you’ll be surprised where it will take you,” Saab said, adding: “We ripped the country apart.”
For Saab, the bombardments of April 8, when rapid Israel strikes across Lebanon killed more than 300 people, “basically brought back the scenes of the whole civil war in seconds.”
Hezbollah was founded in 1982 at the civil war’s peak and was the only group to retain arms after it ended. After Israel withdrew in 2000, Hezbollah expanded its arsenal and deepened its sway over Lebanon’s government. Internal clashes broke out in 2008 and 2021.
However, after a 2024 war with Israel badly weakened Hezbollah, a new Lebanese government backed by the US vowed to disarm it. Lebanese troops began to confiscate its arms gradually, fearing a confrontation if they seized Hezbollah’s arsenal by force.
When Hezbollah fired into Israel on March 2 in support of Iran, some Lebanese blamed it for pulling the country into a new conflict. Some also blamed the wider Shiite community, from which Hezbollah draws its popular support. Meanwhile, Shiite Muslims, who have borne the brunt of wars with Israel and see Hezbollah as their only defense, have criticized the state for failing to protect them. Several Shiites displaced by Israeli strikes said they saw Lebanon’s top officials as “traitors.”
Patrick Baz, a Lebanese photographer, said divisions among Lebanese youth made a new internal conflict possible, citing scenes of armed Christian men, angry at Hezbollah over the war, firing in the air during a funeral of a Christian politician killed in an Israeli strike this month. Baz, who learned the craft in the civil war’s early days and spent his adulthood documenting it, pointed to universities, often a microcosm of broader political tensions.
“I’m sure if you go to universities today and you tell them to carry guns and go and fire at your political opponents or someone you don’t like, they will do it,” he said.
Last week’s temporary ceasefire announcement brought welcome respite after more than five weeks of Israeli strikes that killed nearly 2,300 people.
Yet the deal leaves key issues unaddressed. It neither requires Israeli troops to withdraw from Lebanon nor explicitly demands Hezbollah’s disarmament. It sets Beirut on track for peace talks with Israel, fiercely opposed by some Lebanese across sectarian divides.
A diplomat working on Lebanon described the text as a “detailed recipe for internal confrontation.”
Rafic Bazerji, a senior figure in a Lebanese Christian armed group during the civil war, said deals that do not have “a good foundation” are doomed to reignite tensions, citing the Taif Agreement which ended the civil war, but was never fully implemented, and the government’s unfinished plan to disarm Hezbollah.
Bazerji owns a guesthouse in the mountains southeast of Beirut and heads the Latin League in Lebanon, which represents Latin Christians, one of the country’s many religious groups.
He taught his two adult sons to shoot and sees a young generation that could take up arms.
“As much as we were, in our days, fanatics and we were excited to fight, I’m seeing today a new generation that is scary. We’re kids compared to them,” he said.
Lebanese were worried about reliving the 1975 to 1990 war, where about 150,000 were killed, he added, but splits over Hezbollah, Israel and other key issues could tip into violence.
“In the end, if we can avoid it, we avoid it. But if the razor reaches our throats, we’re also not going to take it lying down,” Bazerji said.
When 17,000 troops from the US, the Philippines, Australia, Japan, Canada, France and New Zealand spread across the Philippine archipelago for the Balikatan military exercise, running from tomorrow through May 8, the official language would be about interoperability, readiness and regional peace. However, the strategic subtext is becoming harder to ignore: The exercises are increasingly about the military geography around Taiwan. Balikatan has always carried political weight. This year, however, the exercise looks different in ways that matter not only to Manila and Washington, but also to Taipei. What began in 2023 as a shift toward a more serious deterrence posture
Reports about Elon Musk planning his own semiconductor fab have sparked anxiety, with some warning that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) could lose key customers to vertical integration. A closer reading suggests a more measured conclusion: Musk is advancing a strategic vision of in-house chip manufacturing, but remains far from replacing the existing foundry ecosystem. For TSMC, the short-term impact is limited; the medium-term challenge lies in supply diversification and pricing pressure, only in the long term could it evolve into a structural threat. The clearest signal is Musk’s announcement that Tesla and SpaceX plan to develop a fab project dubbed “Terafab”
China’s AI ecosystem has one defining difference from Silicon Valley: It is embrace of open source. While the US’ biggest companies race to build ever more powerful systems and insist only they can control them, Chinese labs have been giving the technology away for free. Open source — making a model available for anyone to use, download and build on — once seemed a niche, nerdy topic that no one besides developers cared about. However, when a new technology is driving trillions of dollars of investments and leading to immense concentrations of power, it offered an antidote. That is part of
In late January, Taiwan’s first indigenous submarine, the Hai Kun (海鯤, or Narwhal), completed its first submerged dive, reaching a depth of roughly 50m during trials in the waters off Kaohsiung. By March, it had managed a fifth dive, still well short of the deep-water and endurance tests required before the navy could accept the vessel. The original delivery deadline of November last year passed months ago. CSBC Corp, Taiwan, the lead contractor, now targets June and the Ministry of National Defense is levying daily penalties for every day the submarine remains unfinished. The Hai Kun was supposed to be
RSS