The Iran war has exposed a fundamental vulnerability in the global energy system. The escalating confrontation between Iran, Israel and the US has begun to shake international energy markets, largely because Iran is disrupting shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. This narrow waterway carries roughly one-third of the world’s seaborne oil, making it one of the most strategically sensitive energy corridors in the world. Even the possibility of disruption has triggered sharp volatility in global oil prices. The duration and scope of the conflict remain uncertain, with senior US officials offering contradictory signals about how long military operations might continue. In such circumstances, markets react quickly to uncertainty.
For Taiwan, the implications are particularly serious. The Strait of Hormuz forms a critical link in the nation’s energy supply chain. Official statistics show that approximately 61 percent of Taiwan’s imported crude oil originates from Gulf States, including Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq and Qatar. Nearly one-third of its liquefied natural gas imports also come from Qatar. Any disruption, like a blockade, increased insurance costs for shipping or the rerouting of tankers, would quickly lead to higher energy costs for Taiwan’s economy.
Oil markets have already responded with volatility; the Taiwanese government has activated a dual price-smoothing mechanism to limit increases in gasoline and diesel prices, while state-owned CPC Corp, Taiwan absorbs part of the surge in global fuel costs. Authorities have also temporarily reduced fuel commodity taxes, and introduced targeted subsidies for sectors such as agriculture and fisheries to cushion the impact of rising energy prices. While such measures can stabilize prices in the short term, they shift part of the burden to public finances.
At the same time, the security situation in the strait is becoming increasingly complex. Iran has begun deploying naval mines in the area and has threatened to target oil tankers and cargo ships transiting the strait without its approval. Mines pose long-term dangers as they are difficult to detect and can remain active for decades; in 2024, the Turkish navy neutralized a drifting sea mine near the Dardanelles Strait believed to be a remnant of minefields laid during World War I in 1915. This incident alone illustrates how maritime mines can continue threatening shipping long after conflicts end.
Beyond mines, Iran has several more asymmetric tools to disrupt maritime traffic in the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has been using uncrewed surface vessels even before the war. These systems demonstrated their effectiveness in the Ukraine war by eliminating roughly 40 percent of Russia’s Black Sea Fleet. They are difficult to detect due to low radar signatures and small surface profiles, particularly at night. In addition, portable missile systems such as the Man-Portable Air-Defense System requires minimal preparation compared with ballistic missile launches and can be operated by even an individual. Combined with naval mines and small fast boats, such tools offer cheap and flexible ways to threaten shipping lanes.
For Taiwan, these developments highlight deeper structural issues in energy policy. Taiwan’s energy transition strategy aimed to phase out nuclear power while expanding renewable energy to supply 20 percent of electricity generation. While the nuclear phaseout has been completed, renewable energy accounts for about 12 percent of generation, below the initial target.
This challenge is not unique to Taiwan. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen described Europe’s reduction of nuclear power as a “strategic mistake,” noting that dependence on imported fossil fuels has exposed the region to geopolitical risks and price volatility. Even Japan has begun restarting nuclear reactors after sharply reducing nuclear generation following the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant disaster.
Renewable energy remains essential for long-term decarbonization, but current technologies cannot yet provide the same level of stable baseload power that nuclear plants once supplied. Without sufficient storage capacity or complementary energy sources, systems relying heavily on intermittent renewables might continue to depend on imported fossil fuels. For Taiwan, this issue is particularly significant because energy underpins the functioning of the entire economy, including the advanced manufacturing and semiconductor sectors that anchor global technology supply chains.
In this context, Taiwan’s energy policy requires careful reassessment. The question is not whether renewable energy should expand, but whether the overall system is resilient enough to withstand geopolitical shocks such as those now unfolding around the Strait of Hormuz. Diversifying supply sources, bolstering long-term fuel contracts, improving grid flexibility and reconsideration of the nuclear option could all help reduce Taiwan’s exposure to external disruptions as global energy markets grow increasingly uncertain.
Harun Talha Ayanoglu is a visiting research fellow at the Institute for National Defense and Security Research.
In the event of a war with China, Taiwan has some surprisingly tough defenses that could make it as difficult to tackle as a porcupine: A shoreline dotted with swamps, rocks and concrete barriers; conscription for all adult men; highways and airports that are built to double as hardened combat facilities. This porcupine has a soft underbelly, though, and the war in Iran is exposing it: energy. About 39,000 ships dock at Taiwan’s ports each year, more than the 30,000 that transit the Strait of Hormuz. About one-fifth of their inbound tonnage is coal, oil, refined fuels and liquefied natural gas (LNG),
On Monday, the day before Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) departed on her visit to China, the party released a promotional video titled “Only with peace can we ‘lie flat’” to highlight its desire to have peace across the Taiwan Strait. However, its use of the expression “lie flat” (tang ping, 躺平) drew sarcastic comments, with critics saying it sounded as if the party was “bowing down” to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Amid the controversy over the opposition parties blocking proposed defense budgets, Cheng departed for China after receiving an invitation from the CCP, with a meeting with
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is leading a delegation to China through Sunday. She is expected to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing tomorrow. That date coincides with the anniversary of the signing of the Taiwan Relations Act (TRA), which marked a cornerstone of Taiwan-US relations. Staging their meeting on this date makes it clear that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) intends to challenge the US and demonstrate its “authority” over Taiwan. Since the US severed official diplomatic relations with Taiwan in 1979, it has relied on the TRA as a legal basis for all
The two major opposition parties, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), jointly announced on Tuesday last week that former TPP lawmaker Chang Chi-kai (張啟楷) would be their joint candidate for Chiayi mayor, following polling conducted earlier this month. It is the first case of blue-white (KMT-TPP) cooperation in selecting a joint candidate under an agreement signed by their chairpersons last month. KMT and TPP supporters have blamed their 2024 presidential election loss on failing to decide on a joint candidate, which ended in a dramatic breakdown with participants pointing fingers, calling polls unfair, sobbing and walking