Taiwan’s economy took off in the 1970s and 1980s, transforming it from a developing nation into a beautiful, developed country. National income rose and people lived and worked in peace. The poor believed that so long as you “work hard like an ox, you have nothing to fear” — that you could get a loan to buy a small home without having to worry about being unable to afford the mortgage.
Today, prices and housing costs continue to climb and salaries cannot keep up. For the past half-century, housing prices have only increased. Although the volume of transactions has decreased, prices have not fallen. In just a few decades, Taiwan’s title as one of the Asian Tigers has quietly disappeared.
Although the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics has said that Taiwan’s GDP per capita would surpass US$40,000 this year, most Taiwanese feel absolutely no change. The reason for this lies in Taiwan’s uneven employment structure — of the roughly 11 million people employed, more than 7 million work in the service sector, which has little connection to exports. Semiconductor exporters, whose related employment involves only about 300,000 people, are the main beneficiaries. Even if the wider electronics industry were included, the number of employees would only be about 1 million people — a small proportion of the workforce. Other industries hardly share in these benefits.
A booming tech sector alongside stagnated traditional industries has fueled Taiwan’s economic prosperity and contributed to widening income disparities across sectors. If this were to continue, how could the gap between rich and poor not grow ever wider? Different social classes and industry trends diverge in a “K” shape, with some moving upward and others downward, creating an image of stark polarization. While the government touts a significant increase in GDP per capita, the real challenge — ensuring all citizens can share in the economic benefits — is an important issue that the government must carefully consider.
Taiwan’s GDP per capita surpassing US$40,000 can be partly attributed to negative population growth. Before 2000, Taiwan’s population grew by about 2 million people every 10 years. In the past decade, there has been no growth. Since GDP per capita is calculated by dividing GDP by the population, negative or zero population growth naturally pushes the figure higher. That Taiwan’s GDP per capita has risen from stabilizing at US$30,000 to surpassing US$40,000 in just five years highlights the strength of its economic growth.
Looking at Taiwan’s GDP per capita last year, average annual income reached about NT$1.1 million, while the median total salary was just NT$525,000. This indicates that the high average figure is largely driven by salaries in high-tech industries, such as semiconductor manufacturing, suggesting that Taiwan is experiencing industrial polarization — a phenomenon that warrants government attention and review.
As GDP growth primarily benefits the tech sector, traditional industries continue to struggle and economic gains are not being shared broadly among the population. The government must find ways to ensure that high-tech and traditional sectors share these economic benefits, so that the majority of citizens do not come to resent the government for failing to deliver on its promises.
Wang Chin-ho is retired.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
On Feb. 7, the New York Times ran a column by Nicholas Kristof (“What if the valedictorians were America’s cool kids?”) that blindly and lavishly praised education in Taiwan and in Asia more broadly. We are used to this kind of Orientalist admiration for what is, at the end of the day, paradoxically very Anglo-centered. They could have praised Europeans for valuing education, too, but one rarely sees an American praising Europe, right? It immediately made me think of something I have observed. If Taiwanese education looks so wonderful through the eyes of the archetypal expat, gazing from an ivory tower, how
China has apparently emerged as one of the clearest and most predictable beneficiaries of US President Donald Trump’s “America First” and “Make America Great Again” approach. Many countries are scrambling to defend their interests and reputation regarding an increasingly unpredictable and self-seeking US. There is a growing consensus among foreign policy pundits that the world has already entered the beginning of the end of Pax Americana, the US-led international order. Consequently, a number of countries are reversing their foreign policy preferences. The result has been an accelerating turn toward China as an alternative economic partner, with Beijing hosting Western leaders, albeit
During the long Lunar New Year’s holiday, Taiwan has shown several positive developments in different aspects of society, hinting at a hopeful outlook for the Year of the Horse, but there are also significant challenges that the country must cautiously navigate with strength, wisdom and resilience. Before the holiday break, Taiwan’s stock market closed at a record 10,080.3 points and the TAIEX wrapped up at a record-high 33,605.71 points, while Taipei and Washington formally signed the Taiwan-US Agreement on Reciprocal Trade that caps US tariffs on Taiwanese goods at 15 percent and secures Taiwan preferential tariff treatment. President William Lai (賴清德) in
RSS