Taiwan’s economy took off in the 1970s and 1980s, transforming it from a developing nation into a beautiful, developed country. National income rose and people lived and worked in peace. The poor believed that so long as you “work hard like an ox, you have nothing to fear” — that you could get a loan to buy a small home without having to worry about being unable to afford the mortgage.
Today, prices and housing costs continue to climb and salaries cannot keep up. For the past half-century, housing prices have only increased. Although the volume of transactions has decreased, prices have not fallen. In just a few decades, Taiwan’s title as one of the Asian Tigers has quietly disappeared.
Although the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics has said that Taiwan’s GDP per capita would surpass US$40,000 this year, most Taiwanese feel absolutely no change. The reason for this lies in Taiwan’s uneven employment structure — of the roughly 11 million people employed, more than 7 million work in the service sector, which has little connection to exports. Semiconductor exporters, whose related employment involves only about 300,000 people, are the main beneficiaries. Even if the wider electronics industry were included, the number of employees would only be about 1 million people — a small proportion of the workforce. Other industries hardly share in these benefits.
A booming tech sector alongside stagnated traditional industries has fueled Taiwan’s economic prosperity and contributed to widening income disparities across sectors. If this were to continue, how could the gap between rich and poor not grow ever wider? Different social classes and industry trends diverge in a “K” shape, with some moving upward and others downward, creating an image of stark polarization. While the government touts a significant increase in GDP per capita, the real challenge — ensuring all citizens can share in the economic benefits — is an important issue that the government must carefully consider.
Taiwan’s GDP per capita surpassing US$40,000 can be partly attributed to negative population growth. Before 2000, Taiwan’s population grew by about 2 million people every 10 years. In the past decade, there has been no growth. Since GDP per capita is calculated by dividing GDP by the population, negative or zero population growth naturally pushes the figure higher. That Taiwan’s GDP per capita has risen from stabilizing at US$30,000 to surpassing US$40,000 in just five years highlights the strength of its economic growth.
Looking at Taiwan’s GDP per capita last year, average annual income reached about NT$1.1 million, while the median total salary was just NT$525,000. This indicates that the high average figure is largely driven by salaries in high-tech industries, such as semiconductor manufacturing, suggesting that Taiwan is experiencing industrial polarization — a phenomenon that warrants government attention and review.
As GDP growth primarily benefits the tech sector, traditional industries continue to struggle and economic gains are not being shared broadly among the population. The government must find ways to ensure that high-tech and traditional sectors share these economic benefits, so that the majority of citizens do not come to resent the government for failing to deliver on its promises.
Wang Chin-ho is retired.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime