After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice.
The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era — the decades-long period of political repression under the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) — this trove offers something long missing: primary-source documentation of how the system functioned.
For decades, public understanding of authoritarian-era surveillance and political trials has relied heavily on survivors’ testimonies and fragmentary historical records. Those voices have been indispensable, but they were often dismissed by skeptics demanding documentary proof. Now, with what authorities describe as a “not a single file withheld, not a single word redacted” release, history can be rigorously verified.
However, transparency does not automatically equal completeness. Questions remain about earlier archival practices — particularly the bundling or merging of files — that might have resulted in missing material. Declassification is not the final truth delivered in full. It is the beginning of a deeper inquiry.
The significance of opening these archives is not about settling scores. It is about clarifying how state power operated — and how it violated the rights of its citizens. Only by examining how institutions were structured to surveil, intimidate and punish can society fully grasp the cost of the democracy it now takes for granted. Transitional justice is not revenge; it is institutional self-understanding.
This wave of declassification is likely to spark renewed research across academia, journalism and civil society. It also serves as a reminder that history does not settle itself with time. Truth does not quietly sediment on its own. It must be persistently pursued, interrogated and contextualized.
Transitional justice begins with confronting the record. Taiwan has now opened another chapter.
Wang Hao is a political commentator.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
On Feb. 7, the New York Times ran a column by Nicholas Kristof (“What if the valedictorians were America’s cool kids?”) that blindly and lavishly praised education in Taiwan and in Asia more broadly. We are used to this kind of Orientalist admiration for what is, at the end of the day, paradoxically very Anglo-centered. They could have praised Europeans for valuing education, too, but one rarely sees an American praising Europe, right? It immediately made me think of something I have observed. If Taiwanese education looks so wonderful through the eyes of the archetypal expat, gazing from an ivory tower, how
China has apparently emerged as one of the clearest and most predictable beneficiaries of US President Donald Trump’s “America First” and “Make America Great Again” approach. Many countries are scrambling to defend their interests and reputation regarding an increasingly unpredictable and self-seeking US. There is a growing consensus among foreign policy pundits that the world has already entered the beginning of the end of Pax Americana, the US-led international order. Consequently, a number of countries are reversing their foreign policy preferences. The result has been an accelerating turn toward China as an alternative economic partner, with Beijing hosting Western leaders, albeit
During the long Lunar New Year’s holiday, Taiwan has shown several positive developments in different aspects of society, hinting at a hopeful outlook for the Year of the Horse, but there are also significant challenges that the country must cautiously navigate with strength, wisdom and resilience. Before the holiday break, Taiwan’s stock market closed at a record 10,080.3 points and the TAIEX wrapped up at a record-high 33,605.71 points, while Taipei and Washington formally signed the Taiwan-US Agreement on Reciprocal Trade that caps US tariffs on Taiwanese goods at 15 percent and secures Taiwan preferential tariff treatment. President William Lai (賴清德) in
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Deputy Chairman Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑) earlier this month led a delegation to Beijing to attend a think tank forum between the KMT and Chinese Communist Party (CCP). After returning to Taiwan, Hsiao spoke at length about “accumulating mutual trust” and letting matters “fall into place,” portraying the forum as a series of discussions focused on cooperation in tourism, renewable energy, disaster prevention, emerging industries, health and medicine, and artificial intelligence (AI). However, when the entire dialogue presupposes the so-called “1992 consensus — the idea that there is only “one China,” with each side of the Taiwan
RSS