After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice.
The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era — the decades-long period of political repression under the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) — this trove offers something long missing: primary-source documentation of how the system functioned.
For decades, public understanding of authoritarian-era surveillance and political trials has relied heavily on survivors’ testimonies and fragmentary historical records. Those voices have been indispensable, but they were often dismissed by skeptics demanding documentary proof. Now, with what authorities describe as a “not a single file withheld, not a single word redacted” release, history can be rigorously verified.
However, transparency does not automatically equal completeness. Questions remain about earlier archival practices — particularly the bundling or merging of files — that might have resulted in missing material. Declassification is not the final truth delivered in full. It is the beginning of a deeper inquiry.
The significance of opening these archives is not about settling scores. It is about clarifying how state power operated — and how it violated the rights of its citizens. Only by examining how institutions were structured to surveil, intimidate and punish can society fully grasp the cost of the democracy it now takes for granted. Transitional justice is not revenge; it is institutional self-understanding.
This wave of declassification is likely to spark renewed research across academia, journalism and civil society. It also serves as a reminder that history does not settle itself with time. Truth does not quietly sediment on its own. It must be persistently pursued, interrogated and contextualized.
Transitional justice begins with confronting the record. Taiwan has now opened another chapter.
Wang Hao is a political commentator.
Translated by Lin Lee-kai
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS